Right. There's nothing tacky whatsoever about Las Vegas. You would have to be a snob to even think so.Tacky is just a word that snobs use.
As is "smelly", but that doesn't justify the decision to avoid showering for six weeks.Tacky is just a word that snobs use.
Well, to speak for myself, that's one of the reason I dislike the kind of culture expressed by the architecture shown: it's classist and manipulative. It doesn't encourage intellectual or cultural growth, it cultivates stagnation. It conspires, albeit unconsciously, to keep the working class dumb. The working class are, after all, quite capable of comprehending and appreciating thoughtful culture- the graphic design section at a larger bookshop or a library should have a book or two about early Soviet art and architecture which bears this out; see spoiler- but are generally discouraged from doing so by a stratified culture. Indulging them with soulless kitsch merely perpetuates this, as does the assertion that this kind of rubbish is "for the working class", and that more considered art is not only "for someone else", but that it is, by implication, "not for the working class". It's the middle classes saying to themselves, "now, what do those proles like? Ah yes, crap!" and proceeding to build acres of it.I stand by my comment. Many people like the Excalibur hotel/casino (the castle picture). It's not my thing. But many in lower middle class america like that. Even if it is tacky, it's still snobbish to put it down. Basically what that's saying is your social class thinks it's aweful, but a majority of the population thinks it's great.
Well, to speak for myself, that's one of the reason I dislike the kind of culture expressed by the architecture shown: it's classist and manipulative. It doesn't encourage intellectual or cultural growth, it cultivates stagnation. It conspires, albeit unconsciously, to keep the working class dumb. The working class are, after all, quite capable of comprehending and appreciating thoughtful culture- the graphic design section at a larger bookshop or a library should have a book or two about early Soviet art and architecture which bears this out; see spoiler- but are generally discouraged from doing so by a stratified culture. Indulging them with soulless kitsch merely perpetuates this, as does the assertion that this kind of rubbish the working class" them, and that more considered art is not only "for someone else", but that it is, by implication, "not for them". It's the middle classes saying to themselves, "now, what do those proles like? Ah yes, crap!" and proceeding to build acres of it.
Spoiler :"Beat the Whites With the Red Wedge", Bolshevik propaganda from the Russian Civil War, aimed at a semi-literate Russian working class:
![]()
Pop Idol it ain't.
Well, I was describing that sort of culture in general, rather than Las Vega in particular. Also, for a variety of reasons, the term "working class" has a different meaning in Europe, and is essentially equivalent to the American "lower-middle class". I suppose I translated one way when reading, and didn't think to translate back when working. I guess it just felt weird using "lower-middle class" to refer to automotive workers and skilled labourers when, in my normal usage, it means school teachers and corporate middle management.But is Las Vegas for the working class? They don't exactly have money for gambling.
I take it you've never been there and didn't watch the Big Elvis video above. Places like Las Vegas are particularly diligent about taking the quarters of the working class and the elderly via the one-armed bandits, as much as they are at taking the thousands from the "players" at the high stakes tables. The payout for slot machines is typically far worse than any of the other "games of chance".But is Las Vegas for the working class? They don't exactly have money for gambling.