ParadigmShifter
Random Nonsense Generator
Lolbertarian, anarchrist, what does it matter? You're still all a bit weird and probably mental.
Think Rand Paul is an intellectual lightweight?
- Thread starter Cryptic_Snow
- Start date
GhostWriter16
Deity
I really wonder what that says about liberals
At least we have dibs on evil
At least we have dibs on evil
ParadigmShifter
Random Nonsense Generator
Indeed you do. As I said, there's a reason that liberalism gives a free tech in Civ IV. Think about it.
GhostWriter16
Deity
Yeah, because a freaking video game should be our basis for how we think.
Liberals really are idiots
Liberals really are idiots
ParadigmShifter
Random Nonsense Generator
Think that if you like (I'm joking btw).
What we really need is a book written in the iron age for a basis for all that is true.
What we really need is a book written in the iron age for a basis for all that is true.
useless
Social Justice Rogue
A book that coincidently advocates rape, slavery and genocide, not to mention other abhorrent ideas
GhostWriter16
Deity
I figured you were kidding, but I have the smilie to PROVE I was kidding
That said, we do have such a book.
When did we switch topics and start talking about the Qu'ran?
Not to mention it was still written after the iron age.
After the Iron Age? When do you think the Iron Age ended?
useless
Social Justice Rogue
I'm not talking about the Qu'ran. I'm talking about the bible.
GhostWriter16
Deity
Didn't it end after Rome?
Then you must never have really read the Bible.
Somewhere around then, I would say, yes. The Council of Nicaea was already deciding on which books to include around then too.
Wow just wow. Do you actually believe this?
Ron Paul is just a reactionary old fart who gives potheads on the internet boners because he wants to legalize their favorite past time.
He is certainly no anarchist
GhostWriter16
Deity
Than the Qu'ran (Which is the book I assumed he referred too
) was written after the end of the iron age.Wow just wow. Do you actually believe this?
Ron Paul is just a reactionary old fart who gives potheads on the internet boners because he wants to legalize their favorite past time.
He is certainly no anarchist
Anarchist, no, but definitely Libertarian.
Yeah, he's a libertarian.
Murky
Deity
Wow just wow. Do you actually believe this?
Ron Paul is just a reactionary old fart who gives potheads on the internet boners because he wants to legalize their favorite past time.
He is certainly no anarchist
That is a pipe dream. There's actually more of a chance of getting legalization with liberal Democrats. What you need to do is come up with a good reason other than just wanting the government to stay out of everyone's business. If you go the libertarian route then you'll get an awful lot of bad along with whatever other goal you're seeking. The worst is the lack of environmental regulations and protections. Say goodbye to clean air, water and land if libertarians had all the power. No safety nets and lots more privatization of prisons would actually create more incentive to keep it illegal so they can get more prisoners to work for free.
Traitorfish
The Tighnahulish Kid
He's not really an anarchist, he's just an anti-statists. Anarchists are against power as such, not just against the Westphalian nation-state.
/pedant
I know you're kinda the king of meaningless political labels around here, but I can do without your authority on this matter, thanks.
Label-juggling notwithstanding, the fact remains that Abegweit actually knows what he's talking about, instead of just announcing his ideology because it's the current rightwing fad.
"Westphalian" nation-state? Is this part of that mischaracterization of the IPO and IPM that used to be popular back in like the thirties?
Traitorfish
The Tighnahulish Kid
I meant nation-states that are situated between the Stephanian and Namurian strata. Trolls and such.
Similar threads
