Snerk
Smeghead
Ask Jeeves or gtfo.
Yeah, I should probably be using duckduckgo.com, but I'm just too lazy to make a bookmark for that.I'd recommend that you use a different search engine.
You'll man the turret.You definitely need me as co-pilot in that starfighter you take the Dubai chicks in.
He probably doesn't use his thumbs. Like most people over 50, he holds his phone in one hand and uses the fingers on the other to scroll through things. One-handed thumbing is too new-fangled for us. We don't text with our thumbs either.I guess it's the mental image of a guy who spends his time imploring people to live more simply hunched over his mobile thumbing through his mentions.
He probably doesn't use his thumbs. Like most people over 50, he holds his phone in one hand and uses the fingers on the other to scroll through things.
Yuo is of serious?Yeah, I should probably be using duckduckgo.com, but I'm just too lazy to make a bookmark for that.
Sweet.You'll man the turret.
I was, but have since installed the extension. Now I can search without being tracked, and without having my political queues be filtered by google.Yuo is of serious?
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-41188560BBC said:Row over AI that 'identifies gay faces'
A facial recognition experiment that claims to be able to distinguish between gay and heterosexual people has sparked a row between its creators and two leading LGBT rights groups.
The Stanford University study claims its software recognises facial features relating to sexual orientation that are not perceived by human observers.
The work has been accused of being "dangerous" and "junk science".
But the scientists involved say these are "knee-jerk" reactions.
Details of the peer-reviewed project are due to be published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Sounds like phrenology to me.Because this seems like a good idea.
BBC said:Row over AI that 'identifies gay faces'
A facial recognition experiment that claims to be able to distinguish between gay and heterosexual people has sparked a row between its creators and two leading LGBT rights groups.
The Stanford University study claims its software recognises facial features relating to sexual orientation that are not perceived by human observers.
The work has been accused of being "dangerous" and "junk science".
But the scientists involved say these are "knee-jerk" reactions.
Details of the peer-reviewed project are due to be published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-41188560
Next: skull-size recognition software to identify intelligence and fitness to be a royal.