GoodSarmatian
Jokerfied Western Male
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2006
- Messages
- 9,408
For painless killing, it would be far better to go with nitrogen gassing though.
And you can save a lot of money if you put multiple people in the same chamber.
For painless killing, it would be far better to go with nitrogen gassing though.
Just because I think a rabid dog needs to be put down doesn't mean I want it done slow....causing pain isn't a requirement of the desired end result.
One would save a lot more by reducing the appeals process for people who are sentenced to death.And you can save a lot of money if you put multiple people in the same chamber.
Hmm. This is a human being you're talking about here, you know?
But my question remains unanswered: why don't you want "it done slow"?
What difference does it make to you one way or the other?
I can understand "causing pain isn't a requirement", but that doesn't explain why avoiding pain would be a requirement.
I'm talking about a person who knowingly planned to kill as many innocent people as possible in a terrorist attack. Personally, I think a rabid dog more deserving of mercy.
As to your question about 'doing it slow'. Doing is slow is inefficient. If I were in charge, it would be one round, right in the skull and call it good. If that didn't work, the simply repeat until desired result is achieved. Cheap, efficient, effective, and presumably pretty darn painless.
...so the plan is to make him a martyr?
...so the plan is to make him a martyr?
His execution, and disposal of the body will be done quietly and secretly.
Only ISIS dose extravagant execution videos.
Mr Havv said:"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."
Odds are if that's the situation, he'll be considered one whether you kill him or not. Either a live hero or a dead martyr. Of those two, for someone that tried to kill as many innocent people they could, i'll take dead martyr any day of the week.