[RD] War in Gaza: News Thread

Jewish settlers set their sights on Gaza beachfront​

Who wouldn't want a house on the beach? For some on Israel's far-right, desirable beachfront now includes the sands of Gaza.

Just ask Daniella Weiss, 78, the grandmother of Israel's settler movement, who says she already has a list of 500 families ready to move to Gaza immediately.

"I have friends in Tel Aviv," she says, "so they say, 'Don't forget to keep for me a plot near the coast in Gaza,' because it's a beautiful, beautiful coast, beautiful golden sand".

She tells them the plots on the coast are already booked.

Mrs Weiss heads a radical settler organisation called Nachala, or homeland. For decades, she has been kickstarting Jewish settlements in the Israeli-occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem, on Palestinian land captured by Israel in the 1967 Middle East war.

Some in the settler movement have cherished the dream - or pipedream - of returning to Gaza since 2005, when Israel ordered a unilateral pullout, 21 settlements were dismantled and about 9,000 settlers were evacuated by the army. (Reporting from Gaza at the time, I saw many who were literally dragged out.)

Many settlers saw all this as a betrayal by the state, and a strategic mistake.

Opinion polls suggest that most Israelis oppose resettling Gaza, and it is not government policy, but since the Hamas attacks on 7 October it is being talked about out loud - by some of the loudest and most extreme voices in Israel's government.

Mrs Weiss proudly shows me a map of the West Bank with pink dots indicating Jewish settlements. The dots are scattered all over the map, eating away at land where Palestinians hope - or hoped - to build their state.

There are about 700,000 Jewish settlers in these areas now and settler numbers are rising fast.

The vast majority of the international community considers settlements illegal under international law, including the United Nations Security Council. Israel disputes this.

We meet Daniella at her home in the West Bank settlement of Kedumim, where red-roofed houses are spread over hilltops and valleys. She's in constant motion despite having an arm in plaster.

Her vision for the future of Gaza - now home to 2.3 million Palestinians, many of them starving - is that it will be Jewish.

"Gaza Arabs will not stay in the Gaza Strip," she says. "Who will stay? Jews."

She claims that Palestinians want to leave Gaza and that other countries should take them in - although in a lengthy interview, she rarely uses the word "Palestinian".

"The world is wide," she says. "Africa is big. Canada is big. The world will absorb the people of Gaza. How we do it? We encourage it. Palestinians in Gaza, the good ones, will be enabled. I'm not saying forced, I say enabled because they want to go."

There is no evidence that Palestinians want to leave their homeland - although many may now dream of escaping temporarily, to save their lives. For most Palestinians, there is no way out. The borders are tightly controlled by Israel and Egypt, and no foreign countries have offered refuge.

I put it to her that her comments sound like a plan for ethnic cleansing. She does not deny it.

"You can call it ethnic cleansing. I repeat again, the Arabs do not want, normal Arabs do not want to live in Gaza. If you want to call it cleansing, if you want to call it apartheid, you choose your definition. I choose the way to protect the state of Israel. "

A few days later, Daniella Weiss is selling the idea of a return to Gaza over cake and popcorn at a small gathering, hosted by another settler in their living room.

She has a projector, showing a new map of Gaza, complete with settlements, and leaflets entitled "Go back to Gaza".

"People are asking me what the odds are this will happen?" she says.

"What were the odds back then when I came to these dark mountains and made it into this heaven?"

The handful in attendance seem already convinced. "I want to go back immediately," says Sarah Manella. "When they call me, I will go back to Gush Katif [the former Israeli settlement bloc in Gaza]."

What about the people who live there, we ask.

"The area is empty now, "she replies. "Now you don't need to think where to put the settlement, you only need to come back and put a new settlement."

Gaza is far from empty, but much of it has been erased after almost six months of relentless Israeli bombardment.

It is the "greatest open-air graveyard" in the world, in the words of the EU's foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell.

More than 32,000 Palestinians have been killed, according to the Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza, most of them women and children. The World Health Organization regards the ministry's data as credible.

For some in the Israeli cabinet, the Palestinian territory - now drenched in blood - is ripe for resettlement. That includes Israel's hard-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir - a settler himself.

In late January, he made his way through a packed conference hall, slowed by embraces and handshakes. He was among friends - about 1,000 ultranationalists pushing for a return to Gaza at the event entitled Settlement Brings Security.

Mr Ben Gvir, who favours "encouraging emigration", was among a dozen cabinet ministers in attendance.

"It's time to go back home," he said from the stage, to loud applause. "It's time to return to the land of Israel. If we don't want another 7 October, we need to return home and control the land."

In the shade of a sprawling tree, Yehuda Shimon is playing with his two young sons, who are in hammocks, hanging from the branches.

He has raised 10 children here in a settler outpost in the West Bank called Havat Gilad, or Gilad's Farm, near the Palestinian city of Nablus.

All around him there are Palestinian villages, the nearest 500m away. There is no contact between them, he says.

Shimon has lived in Gaza in the past and claims a God-given right to return.

"We must do it. It's part of Israel area," he says. "This is the land that God gave us, and you couldn't go to God and tell him, 'OK you gave me, and I gave to other people.' No. I believe in the end we will go back to Gaza."

I ask what this means for the Palestinians.

"They have 52 other places to go in the world," he says, "52 Muslim countries". He says the new Gaza will be "another Tel Aviv".

Outposts like his are multiplying in the West Bank, along with larger settlements, fragmenting Palestinian territory and stoking tension.

Settler attacks on Palestinians have surged since 7 October according to the UN, which has long condemned settlements as "an obstacle to peace".

And now settler organisations have their eyes on Gaza once again.

Is there a real prospect of settlers reaching the beachfront in Gaza?

A seasoned Israeli journalist told me it won't happen. "Calls to resettle Gaza won't be translated into policy," he said.

Then he added: "Famous last words."
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-68650815
 

Unless you have experienced it yourself, I think it’s hard for some people in the west to understand the extent to which Palestinian lives are policed and controlled by Israel. We are constantly told that the situation is far too complex to parse, but when you go there, when you see how people live, it doesn’t feel complex at all.

“It’s made to sound as though you need a degree in Middle Eastern studies or some such, a PhD, to really understand what’s happening,” the acclaimed author Ta-Nehisi Coates said after he visited Israel and Palestine last year. “But I understood the first day … I was in a territory where your mobility is inhibited, where your voting rights are inhibited, where your right to the water is inhibited, where your right to housing is inhibited. And it’s all inhibited based on ethnicity. And that sounded extremely, extremely familiar to me.”
Twenty-one years ago, in 2003, American peace activist Rachel Corrie went to Gaza to defend homes in Rafah from being demolished by Israeli forces. “I couldn’t even believe that a place like this existed,” Corrie wrote in her diaries. “[N]o amount of reading, attendance at conferences, documentary viewing and word of mouth could have prepared me for the reality of the situation here. You just can’t imagine it unless you see it … Just want to write to my Mom and tell her that I’m witnessing this chronic, insidious genocide and I’m really scared, and questioning my fundamental belief in the goodness of human nature. This has to stop. I think it is a good idea for us all to drop everything and devote our lives to making this stop.”

A couple of weeks after writing that, 23-year-old Corrie was crushed to death by an Israeli soldier driving a US-made bulldozer. Nobody was ever held accountable for her death. Nobody will ever be held accountable for 12-year-old Rami’s death, either.
 
Indeed, the fact that 20% of Israeli citizens are Arabs, while virtually no Jewish minorities remain in 20+ Arab countries undeniably suggests that the ability to co-exist is lacking solely on Israeli side.
20% but the leadership of Israel wants that number to be zero. Hence the problem you don’t acknowledge even exists.
 
I love that “Russia and China have also previously vetoed texts” so you know a complete idiot who thinks he’s a member of an enlightened society can go “oh I guess all the superpowers are helping Israel” instead of “but did they really veto ceasefire resolutions or quote unquote ‘texts,’ whatever those are.”
 
^Is it likely to have an effect?

The next days will tell. UN member states are obliged to follow resolutions adopted by the Security Council. That doesn't mean that they always do. You should view the SC as an organ of five permanent members usually voting according to their own geo-political and security related interests.
 
The next days will tell. UN member states are obliged to follow resolutions adopted by the Security Council. That doesn't mean that they always do. You should view the SC as an organ of five permanent members usually voting according to their own geo-political and security related interests.
But is there any punishment for not abiding by UNSC resolution?



Bibi's throwing a tantrum

 
Any UN member state can impose sanctions of various severity on member states not abiding by UNSC resolutions. It's not likely to come into play here; I would expect that the Israeli government was informed beforehand by the US government. Bibi cancelling his Washington trip just now, is diplomatic tango. Bibi is politically a dead man walking at home anyway; it's just a question of when his government coalition falls or breaks apart. The US isn't wasting any more political capital on him.
 
I have been unable to find the exact text of the resolution on the UN site; just endless comment on reactions to it:

So went to:


The resolution calls for an immediate ceasefire for the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan, which ends in two weeks,
and also demands that Hamas free captives seized on October 7 when it led attacks on Israel.

Even if Israel does cease attacking for two weeks, I assume it will all start up again at the end of Ramadan.
 
The interesting bit is whether Hamas will begin to release hostages, if Israeli forces obey the ceasefire.
 
But can't those countries impose sanctions anyway? Would they need a UNSC resolution to do that?

UNSC sanctions have a legal framework underwriting them. Meaning that as an example, courts of law can be expected to rule in favor of the party imposing the sanctions, if assets need to be confiscated or what have you. Unilaterally imposed sanctions don't necessarily have that legal framework authority; sanctions are politically motivated tools after all.
 
The interesting bit is whether Hamas will begin to release hostages, if Israeli forces obey the ceasefire.
I don't think it's that interesting. Either they will, will lose all leverage, and Israel will go back to pounding Gaza into dust, or they won't, be criticised for it, and Israel will go back to pounding Gaza into dust.

Like ultimately saving the lives of hostages is good. But that's not really where any solution lies.

Reigning Israel in will take more than that. Getting people to treat tens of thousands of Gazan dead as remotely as importantly as a couple of hundred of Israeli hostages will take more than that. And the latter seems more achievable than the former at this point. Netanyahu is desperate to maintain the war as long as possible, and I'm sure he'll find a way, hostages or not.
 
Screenshot from Tweet:
1711401058739.png


Direct link to article:
 
Top Bottom