_random_
Jewel Runner
You know, I may give that a try.
It's a Ketogenic diet and it basically forces your body to use your fat reserves as fuel instead of sugars and carbs.
If you eat less than 20g of carbs & sugars for 3 days or so, your body will start producing ketone bodies and will go into a state of ketosis. While in this stage it will use fat as its sole energy source.
The diet is supposed to be high in fat so that you stay full, but if you feel full just eat some bacon.. so hey.. it's pretty much the PERFECT diet. Eat bacon - lose weight. I ate way more protein and less fat than I was supposed to, and I lost a ton of weight anyway.. I even cheated every weekend and sometimes even more frequently than that...
A side benefit from cutting out carbs & sugars was me feeling more energetic every day. It made me feel great!
Watch out though.. You are really changing your diet & internal body chemistry a lot by doing this.. You're basically hacking your bodySo.. it could affect you in other ways too, especially if your internal chemistry is not very adaptive to sudden change.
Cutting out processed foods is going to do your body a lot of good anyway, so if you're not ready for a drastic change like that, you could at least look into eating healthier ... more veggies, less processed foods, more bacon, etc.
I try to minimize pollution in my Civ games. I hate wasting Settlers and Engineers' time cleaning up pollution when they could be doing something more productive.I'm curious what are the aims of civ-gamers. Or do you have an aim? is it worthwhile to formulate one? what does the process entail? can you have multiple aims?
You have 10,001 student loans? What currency did your schools operate in - gold-pressed latinum?3) Pay off my first student loan by the end of the summer. After that, only 10,000 left to go!
Volunteer at a cat/dog shelter. You will have a great deal of verbal communication with non-humans, and will be giving something of yourself to little furry people who appreciate it.As a human I require verbal/text communication to not feel fully isolated. If you have any alternatives besides another human, please, do share.
Either you get something emotional out of social activity which hence improves your health or whatever, or you don't.
But here is the thing: I don't think that reasoning actually breeds feeling. Rather, I think it is merely used to legitimize feelings. ...
To feel is not rational.
You have 10,001 student loans? What currency did your schools operate in - gold-pressed latinum?![]()
And that's in Canada. Where I live, it's been in the 90s/100s F. What's the temperature up there?My aim (as in short-term goal) is to survive the current heat-wave. I HATE SUMMER!![]()
And that's in Canada. Where I live, it's been in the 90s/100s F. What's the temperature up there?
Volunteer at a cat/dog shelter. You will have a great deal of verbal communication with non-humans, and will be giving something of yourself to little furry people who appreciate it.
Same thing (or close enough as makes not a lot of difference, when you add in the effects of humidity). We're now getting the system Ontario had a few days ago. Yesterday was horrible. I don't own an AC or even a fan; not that it would have done much good in the afternoon anyway, considering we had rolling blackouts.And that's in Canada. Where I live, it's been in the 90s/100s F. What's the temperature up there?
They don't talk to you in English, silly human! You have to learn their languages - not only oral, but also body language. I'm sure the chihuahua said a lot to you, but probably gave up because you just didn't talk back.Wait... cats and dogs can talk now? This is amazing! I must see this immediately.
*goes upstairs and tries talking to the little old chihuahua in the house*
Nope. They don't talk. How could you lie to me Valka?![]()
![]()
If it was only a compulsion with no emotional benefit (joy), than he doesn't actually need it. Which is fine if true (well no, but for the point we discuss here), but I don't buy that and hsi reference to his health strongly indicates otherwise.That's a false dichotomy. Alternative explanations exist, such as a compulsion to communicate that creates no actual joy
I see no relevance of this whatsoeveror sliding scale of communication whereby some level of communication is helpful but too much or too little is harmful.
If I say legitimization, I of course include delegitimization.Exploration of feelings through discussion doesn't necessarily lead to legitimizing them. In contrast, it is perfectly possible that a examination of an emotional state can lead one to refute that state.
If it is not ultimately based on irrationality - it is.Simply because a state is not itself rational it does not mean that rational, logical examination of that state is invalid.
80s-100s with high humidity. It's getting calmer now though.
Ouch. My power was out for three days due to a storm, and it was misery. And that was with a generator to power our fans every few hours! (Not the AC, though, since it isn't strong enough.) You all have my sympathies. (Lot of good that does when you're getting baked.)Same thing (or close enough as makes not a lot of difference, when you add in the effects of humidity). We're now getting the system Ontario had a few days ago. Yesterday was horrible. I don't own an AC or even a fan; not that it would have done much good in the afternoon anyway, considering we had rolling blackouts.
If I say legitimization, I of course include delegitimization.
Likewise, if you had a sliding scale of legitimacy, the concept of illegitimacy is implicit. As that if you have two alternatives and one alternative is highly more legitimate than the other, you can just as well then call the other illegitimate. ... Rather, illegitimacy I would say describes a low level of legitimacy.