warpus
Sommerswerd asked me to change this
In a game of chess I would expect the human fighter to win or at least tie
You haven't met my ex wife.In a game of chess I would expect the human fighter to win or at least tie
"I'm not trained and have no idea what I'm talking about, but here I explain how it's totally easy if I do these things that trained fighters have difficulty doing."
Chimps are far stronger than humans. And can bite through your arm
I, and others, have posted in this thread about exactly how strong and vicious chimps are. Against a full grown chimp a human simply wouldn't stand a chance. The neck muscles are way too strong to snap or choke out -- unless you're Brock Lesnar. Are you? - and if you tried it would bite through your arm. Not into; through.My experience with attacking animals is limited to pissed off cats and the dogs on my paper routes. So you disagree with my approach of isolating the chimp's mouth... What would you do instead? I didn't say it was easy and if you believe trained fighters would have difficulty then why are you arguing with me? I said a trained fighter could beat a chimp.
I, and others, have posted in this thread about exactly how strong and vicious chimps are. Against a full grown chimp a human simply wouldn't stand a chance. The neck muscles are way too strong to snap or choke out -- unless you're Brock Lesnar. Are you? - and if you tried it would bite through your arm. Not into; through.
I'd run like a scared little b*tch and hope it left me alone. A single human, no matter how well trained, is t beating a chimp with a knife. A spear... Maybe, if the chimp didn't bat it aside in the initial charge. But you ideally need a ranged weapon like a gun or crossbow. If it's close enough to grab you, the chimp wins every time.
Pound for pound, our closest cousins in the animal kingdom are about 1.35 times more powerful than humans, according to the first study to compare the underlying biology and mechanics of chimpanzee muscle to human muscle, along with reviewing previous research on the topic. But don't let that get you down. Human muscles have enabled us to walk and run great distances, providing us with the foraging and hunting abilities that ultimately made us human.
https://www.livescience.com/59615-are-chimpanzees-stronger-than-humans.html
Die. That's what I'd do.Running is not an option...what would you do? No knife, no spear, just you. I dont think chimps are that much stronger than us, I'm sure there are stronger humans. I'd put a 6'6" 320 lb offensive lineman up against a chimp.
Incidentally, that particular chimp was a stronger than usual alpha male. But if we allow for outliers in human strength, we must also allow for outliers in chimp strength. Bauman also pissed off the chimps to make them pull the weight, making them stronger than usual. Since a chimp in a fight is already pissed off, I don't see that it affects the point here.Bauman took his study on the road, attempting tests at the Philadelphia Zoo and making inquiries as far afield as Chicago and Cincinnati. In 1926, he returned to the Bronx Zoo, successfully testing the largest chimpanzee then in captivity. That animal, named Boma, pulled 847 pounds one-handed.
How did that compare with humans? As a college teacher in South Dakota, Bauman did what any good scientist would do: He recruited the football team as research subjects. He found that not one of his “husky lads” could pull more than 500 pounds with both hands, and only one had a one-handed pull above 200. What’s more, the football players were free to use the dynamometer as they wished, while the chimpanzees had been forced to pull the apparatus from a clumsy posture in their cages. It appeared that chimpanzees really could be more than five times stronger than humans.
Enough strength can overcome any amount of technique, which is why guys like the aforementioned Brock Lesnar are so scary; they have strength and technique. Add the grip strength, the teeth, overdevelopment of the chest and shoulders compared to humans, and it isn't as comparable as at first glance.I think a well trained martial artist would have a reasonable chance
A smaller human fighting against a stronger human for example, but it seems human main advantages such as running and crafting have been taken away.
so a 120 lb chimp is 1.35x a 120 lb human?
This is true, although chimps can still out-sprint and out-jump a human. They lack the ability for endurance running and walking.Do you have to use Imperial ? (54Kilo) is the average weight for a full grown chimpanzee so when they tested strength they had to take into account the weight
I'd imagine Chimpanzee has much stronger arm muscles and weaker leg muscles, that's why they point out humans ability to out run chimpanzee
Die. That's what I'd do.
There are stronger humans, but there are humans that are stronger than bears. They are far from the norm. Your offensive lineman is going to have all that muscle and fat bitten to shreds by an angry chimp. In fact, one of the original tests to gauge chimp strength was to put a chimp against an American football team.
I'd try to achieve a face-saving compromise.Running is not an option...what would you do?
A bite through arm won't necessarily kill you. Getting stabbed in the throat will, however.I, and others, have posted in this thread about exactly how strong and vicious chimps are. Against a full grown chimp a human simply wouldn't stand a chance. The neck muscles are way too strong to snap or choke out -- unless you're Brock Lesnar. Are you? - and if you tried it would bite through your arm. Not into; through.
I'd run like a scared little b*tch and hope it left me alone. A single human, no matter how well trained, is t beating a chimp with a knife. A spear... Maybe, if the chimp didn't bat it aside in the initial charge. But you ideally need a ranged weapon like a gun or crossbow. If it's close enough to grab you, the chimp wins every time.
Not sure about that. There are some videos in YouTube about spear hunting that i will not post here due to the gruesomeness, where a guy kills a bear with a single spear blow, and the bear dies almost as quickly as hit by a .50 bullet. The spear used is nothing but a long stick with a big knife attached to the extreme.Knife is deadly weapon, but has quite low stopping power (not sure if it's correct term in English). That's why it's bad choice for self-defense.
But I'm pretty sure a punch from heavyweight boxer will knock chimp unconscious.
Chimps do tend to avoid weapons actually. They have been known to use clubs.A bite through arm won't necessarily kill you. Getting stabbed in the throat will, however.
Again, if a 70-year old guy can take down 750lbs grizzly with a knife, then a guy in 20s, in great shape and trained to use a knife has a chance against a 120lbs chimp.
He'd could easily get half his face chewed off, but he'd have a chance. For all the speed and strength of the chimp, it's not as if it would be impervious to knives.
And it is unlikely it'd be smart enough to focus on avoiding it either.
A spear actually has excellent stopping power. It has far greater penetrative force than a knife.Not sure about that. There are some videos in YouTube about spear hunting that i will not post here due to the gruesomeness, where a guy kills a bear with a single spear blow, and the bear dies almost as quickly as hit by a .50 bullet. The spear used is nothing but a long stick with a big knife attached to the extreme.
Incidentally, that particular chimp was a stronger than usual alpha male. But if we allow for outliers in human strength, we must also allow for outliers in chimp strength. Bauman also pissed off the chimps to make them pull the weight, making them stronger than usual. Since a chimp in a fight is already pissed off, I don't see that it affects the point here.