What TV Shows Are You Watching? Series VI - Programmes of Power

Status
Not open for further replies.
It turns out that in August the local syndication Universal channel™© decided to quietly start airing the third season of The Rookie.
So now I am six episodes behind and have to wait for it to be over and then start airing again!

[pissed]
 
Another He-Man reboot just dropped on Netflix, making this the second reboot in as many months. This one's CGI, also features a bunch of well-known voice actors and is sponsored by Mattel, so presumably they're angling to sell toys off this new show, just like in the old days.
 
I thought that everything Mattel did was sell toys.
 
I just recently finished Love Sick. Thought of it as a sitcom, and not really, since it's more serious, and has a continuous story.
It's 22 episodes over 3 seasons. It starts with the protagonist being diagnosed with Chlamydia, and having to call up all his exes. Sounds like silly fun, and is definitely fun, but not silly, since it also goes on about his overall love life and the relationships to his friends and their life, but it does tell a real love story.
I found it very good, and apparently the consensus opinion is also that it's really good. Would recommend.
 
Out of curiosity (and a vague memory of a mention by @EgonSpengler?), I watched the first episode of Stumptown on Disney+ last night. Then I watched the second. And I would have watched the third as well, but it was already past 2 am.

So, yeah, I liked it.
 
I just recently finished Love Sick. Thought of it as a sitcom, and not really, since it's more serious, and has a continuous story.
It's 22 episodes over 3 seasons. It starts with the protagonist being diagnosed with Chlamydia, and having to call up all his exes. Sounds like silly fun, and is definitely fun, but not silly, since it also goes on about his overall love life and the relationships to his friends and their life, but it does tell a real love story.
I found it very good, and apparently the consensus opinion is also that it's really good. Would recommend.
What streaming source is it on?
 
Former women's chess champion sues Netflix over a The Queen's Gambit line.

Female Soviet chess legend Nona Gaprindashvili is suing Netflix for $5 million after a scene in the hit show Queen’s Gambit falsely claimed she had never played against men. In fact, she claims to have played and beaten dozens of men. In the suit, Gaprindashvili called the incorrect dialogue “grossly sexist”.

The lawsuit was filed in LA district court on September 16 and is focused mostly on one scene in the Queen’s Gambit. The popular Netflix show is about a fictional American chess player named Beth Harmon who rises up the ranks to become a globally successful chess legend. In the finale of the series, during one scene, a commentator watching Harmon play directly references real-life chess star Gaprindashvili and her career.

“Elizabeth Harmon’s not at all an important player by their standards,” explained the announcer. “The only unusual thing about her, really, is her sex. And even that’s not unique in Russia. There’s Nona Gaprindashvili, but she’s the female world champion and has never faced men.”

At this point, Queen’s Gambit is set in the year 1968. According to the lawsuit filed by Gaprindashvili, by this point in time, she had already played and defeated many men in chess, including 10 grandmasters.

In the suit, the 80-year-old calls the line and the claim she had never played men “manifestly false”. She is suing Netflix for false light invasion of privacy and defamation.

The lawsuit continues, harshly criticizing Netflix for its choice to change history and claiming the company had “brazenly and deliberately lied” about her achievements “For the cheap and cynical purpose of ‘heightening the drama’ by making it appear that its fictional hero had managed to do what no other woman, including Gaprindashvili, had done.”

Netflix said in a statement to the LA Times that the streamer had the “utmost respect” for the legendary chess player, but believes the lawsuit “has no merit” and “will vigorously defend the case.”

In an interview with the New York Times, Gaprindashvili found the whole situation ironic. “[Netflix] was trying to do this fictional character who was blazing the trail for other women, when in reality I had already blazed the trail and inspired generations.”

Bearing in mind that The Queen's Gambit involves only fictional players and, for drama, works on the notion that chess tournaments use the playoff format (they don't, they're round-robins, or [usually for amateur events, to save time] use the Swiss system), I'd say precision about chess history was not promised at any time.
 
Still grumbling about Game of Thrones Season 8... :gripe:

I think I've mentioned this before, but putting aside all the other myriad problems with episode 3, I think my biggest gripe of all, the thing that still makes me so irritated when i think about it...

is the fact that Melisandre doesn't say "Because the night is dark and full of terrors." It's like the people who wrote the episode never watched the show before that episode! :shake:

It's her signature line throughout the entire show, what she has been building up to the whole show... and at the payoff moment... most appropriate moment, for her to deliver the line one last time... she just... doesn't :confused: even though she is actually out in front of the Dothraki horde giving them a pep talk for crissakes... as "the terrors" personified are literally advancing on them, mere feet away, under the cover of night... she doesn't say the line. :sad: It's just beyond belief.:ack:

Ugh that episode was so disappointing, but that is just the rancid, rotten cherry on top.:yuck:
 
Last edited:
Still grumbling about Game of Thrones Season 8... :gripe:

I think I've mentioned this before, but putting aside all the other myriad problems with episode 3, I think my biggest gripe of all, the thing that still makes me so irritated when i think about it...

is the fact that Melisandre doesn't say "Because the night is dark and full of terrors." It's like the people who wrote the episode never watched the show before that episode! :shake:

It's her signature line throughout the entire show, what she has been building up to the whole show... and at the payoff moment... most appropriate moment, for her to deliver the line one last time... she just... doesn't :confused: even though she is actually out in front of the Dothraki horde giving them a pep talk for crissakes... as "the terrors" personified are literally advancing on them, mere feet away, under the cover of night... she doesn't say the line. :sad: It's just beyond belief.:ack:

Ugh that episode was so disappointing, but that is just the rancid, rotten cherry on top.:yuck:

Didn't we warn you about season 8? They really screwed the pooch.
 
Former women's chess champion sues Netflix over a The Queen's Gambit line.

Bearing in mind that The Queen's Gambit involves only fictional players and, for drama, works on the notion that chess tournaments use the playoff format (they don't, they're round-robins, or [usually for amateur events, to save time] use the Swiss system), I'd say precision about chess history was not promised at any time.

They might have gotten away with it if they had not mentioned Gaprindashvili by name and specifically stated she had not done that which she in fact done. :nono:

The Great Zkibblo predicts: This case will settle for an undisclosed amount, with a statement there is no admission of fault.
 
Finished Castlevania. Hmm. It was good. But I also feel it kind of lost itself. Could have been better than it was pretty easily.

S1 7/10
S2 9/10
S3 8/10
S4 8.5/10
 
Sounds like a case of the Streisand Effect in the making to me.

Yes, but in this case it's entirely voluntary. Gaprindashvili surely wants recognition. When the average chess fan thinks of women players they think of Judit Polgar.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom