Let's follow the logical progression of your statements so far. Basically, you grounded your idea of "cultural memory" and "Eurocentrism" (which by the way, you incorrectly defined) from ancient migration patterns of Indo-Europeans. How are these ideas that relevant to each other in any way? Even ignoring your pseudo-intellectual theory of "cultural memory," or your incorrectly defined "Eurocentrism," how did the historical movement of people lead to this "cultural memory" or innate sense of superiority? In that vein, what historical migration do you propose that China's inherent sense of superiority as the "Middle Kingdom" was borne from? If this isn't making any sense, it's because it doesn't. Have you considered that people are annoyed you just because of the fact that your (il)logical progression has no grounding whatsoever?
Or were you merely trying to lecture? Because the community honestly doesn't take kindly to lecturers who have no idea what they're talking about, and throws Wikipedia links at people to try to prove a point. This isn't middle school, your pompous and condescending attitude when talking to people who know far more than you is ingratiating, and your elementary understanding of history isn't going to get you anywhere soon. I suggest you educate yourself, beginning from learning what "Eurocentrism" actually is.
