SUMMARY: I'd prefer to not think about history at all unless I can use out of character obtained knowledge drawn from later periods to manipulate my stats and grow my color on the map. That way I can avoid research and learning about history as much as possible, which I need to avoid anyway if I am to save what little brain matter I have <snip>. I also don't understand there is a difference between plausible alternative paths and fantastical ones, and obfuscate to argue in favor of both, although unsurprisingly I want to be able to pursue the latter.
Also, have you read my orders? Have you any examples of implausible things my nations have done?
What do you all think of using modern economic theory, political theory, etc, to advance your not-so-modern NES country?
Probably difficult to avoid
qoou said:interest rates
qoou said:inflation
qoou said:to drive up exports
qoou said:reduce imports to a particular nation
qoou said:After all, you could make the argument that your king just decided to do a little economic experiment using his personal theories, that just happened to be our modern economic theories.
Modern economic theories are counter-intuitive for the most part. Teaching basic economics to accountants has taught me that. You wouldn't just arrive at the right conclusions for the most part.
So you agree that you shouldn't do unrealistic things?
How do you set them?
How do you manipulate that?
What does this have to do with either of those?
How would that work?
Yes, but I think the fear is why would a nation in the current situation set up a national bank. I am not saying it could happen faster but it would presuppose an educational level in economics far in advance of what it should be in the time period we are discussing (BJ NES 3). Or a truely insane ruler.
So realistic might be mroe along the lines of maybe having a ruler interested in studying the flow of money for say tax reasons or something that over time could grow into an earlier blooming of economic thought. Still would take a good bit of time though.
Its just so many may well say hey next year we are going to have a fully funtioning national bank! That's silly again in the time frame being discussed.
. I was actually somewhat thinking of ABNW; definitely a 19th-century or so scenario though.I try to restrict activity that was not possible in the game time frame, but allow creative thinking even if it is based on hindsight. I cannot stop players from knowing that North America (or perhaps North Diascia) exists. I cannot stop players from anticipating the strong possibility of a Reformation. The map will make exploration more challenging and as for the Reformation, well, we'll have to wait and see.What is realistic? If a mod feels something is unrealistic it will probably fail.
This not the same as driving your nation in a different direction to otl.
Oh, I was definitely not discussing BJNES 3. I was actually somewhat thinking of ABNW; definitely a 19th-century or so scenario though.
North King said:I believe that was his point...
qoou said:Nationalized banks? And I mean, interest rates are one thing that clearly can be abused: if you control your country's banks, and therefore interest rates, you can just lower them to hell, making your people want to invest in things; if you play your cards right, they'll choose to invest in your economy rather than foreign countries' economies, and bam, you've just boosted your growth rate. OOC, or not?
qoou said:You print out a lot of money?
qoou said:Exchange rates affect imports/exports (e.g. inflation means more exporting and less importing).
qoou said:Oh, I was definitely not discussing BJNES 3 . I was actually somewhat thinking of ABNW; definitely a 19th-century or so scenario though.
Adrogans said:Yes, but I think the fear is why would a nation in the current situation set up a national bank.
North King said:Oh, the Indian states didn't succeed in real life so clearly they can only become a clone of Western Europe with a thin veneer of Hinduism to succeed! etc., etc.