North King
blech
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2004
- Messages
- 18,165
Excuse me, I still haven't gotten orders in. 



Symphony D. said:So, I've sort of been rolling the thought around in my head; what makes people so dispassionate toward modern or future settings? I don't buy that it's an overfocus on war or a lack of the ability to build; war is just diplomacy by other means and often involves a lot anyway (and lets face it, most every NES boils down to war at some point) while building up a nation is in fact ever more important with advances in technology and infrastructure (there is more to build). The possibility for unique development of culture, society, and government is also equally present if not more so (more so the second and third; an overambundance of philosophy can produce anything from a theocratic dictatorship to a technocratic socialism to a corporate democracy - customization becomes more possible with time, though culture can stagnate, depending on setting).
I don't believe it can be the play. There's as much possibility for variation there as any other game type if not more. It's clearly not because it's a limited time period either, as that doesn't stop other time-specific NESes from rolling on. There is similar variation available for story (for an idea, Coinich's story). The best answer I can come up with is people don't like to be forced into a specific role and watch it go off in some unrealistic direction, but that happens in any NES which is not a Fresh Start to some degree. And people play those regardless (eg: TNES I, countless others).
What is the cause for this? I am genuinely curious.
hmm? I completely missed it. Where did you edit it?Birdjaguar said:NK and Andis, I have posted my reply in JalNES. It was an edit so it might not be obvious.

Cleric said:What's wrong with shaping a country the way you like it? 'itler did it.
Give me links and sources, and I'll consider it...alex994 said:You know, I'm still waiting for the massive barbarian invasions in jal's nes that occurs as in OTL![]()
