Do you need to improve your English comprehension skills? People who are against immigrants are obviously a problem for the integration of immigrants... Unless, of course, you're saying that anti-immigration types are a tiny, insignificant minority, which would make you as delusional as the worst of them.
What you are perhaps getting at is that anti-immigration types have not really had much influence on the numbers of immigrants being accepted into countries like Germany. But that's not an issue of integration. You can accept immigrants without integrating them, which seems to be what you're complaining about - but then again, in reality, those who are anti-immigration are very unlikely to advocate or support measures that will actually help to integrate immigrants, so maybe your complaint is better directed at them?
Aelf, there are hundreds of million of people in the middle East and North Africa, living in countries that were already brought to collapse (by NATO members playing the imperial game...) or are very likely to collapse in the near future (Egypt, Saudi Arabia, etc.). Europe cannot and will not accommodate these hundreds of millions if they ever try to flee there. And they will try because the alternative will be famine and death. It would mean doubling the population of Europe with foreigners. It is politically impossible, and for a number of reasons.
To be brutally honest, if that ever comes to pass european countries will simply kill enough of those in transit until they deter the others. The military are already busy with the planning, and their working assumptions is that the collapses of Egypt and Saudi Arabia are inevitable, and Turkey is in doubt weather it will be an ally or enemy. This will not be called a genocide, but in terms of human suffering can become a disaster as great as ww2. And it has nothing to do with Islam but that the religion is those countries near Europe is Islam. Were they buddhists the problems would be the same. Is is about poverty, cultural differences, and numbers.
There is only one way to avert such a disgrace. That is to avoid the collapse of these countries in the first place. All the ink spent on how we should be helping immigrants and refugees now is a distraction for bleeding hearth liberals to congratulate themselves while cheering the bombing of foreign countries. And hiring some cheap labour as a bonus. If you are concerned about the welfare of people the focus must be,
now, on preventing people from becoming refugees. Though in that we are very limited because the people of those countries have agency and even if they do get help things can go wrong. But prevent wars and the deliberate fomenting of instability there (Iraq, Libya, Syria, etc) is fundamental to have any chance of preventing this catastrophe. I have some hope in that even some of the usual warmongers recoiled from trying to destroy Egypt, fearful of the consequences. But still those countries seriously need help: access to technology, and investment not only meant to extract more profit in the end. With one nonnegotiable condition: an immediate end to population growth. China did it, so can these do.
Talk about human rights is cheap. The reality is hard. But this can end well, provided that we have an honest public discussion about the issues and take rational actions now to prevent the nightmare scenarios in the future. The big problem is that this public discussion is lacking because the media refuses to handle the hard facts, or they handle them selectively. The "right-wing" media refuses discussions that western governments have been fomenting wars and ruining people's lives, crating millions of refugees. The "liberal" and "left" media refuses to admit the fact that there are limits to the number of immigrants any country will take without social breakdown. What remains of the old school "materialist/marxist left" talks about this as it always did, but has been shut down to a niche position. One of the things I liked in them is that they eventually gave a lot of though to the difficulties of internationalism in a world comprised of nations - had their fair share of failures with it, but do argue over these issues.
