Caught this when testing out BIPED MoveRate because someone set it to QUADRUPED.
that's only the model test unit, is not like you were going to use that anyway


Caught this when testing out BIPED MoveRate because someone set it to QUADRUPED.
To be honest I prefer my skirt, but if you prefer that go on![]()
that's only the model test unit, is not like you were going to use that anyway(and that doesn't affect the model, its more of a unit information thing)... To be honest I prefer my skirt, but if you prefer that go on
I like the hat.
I also like your skirt more, but I guess we don't have a vote anymore![]()
Silim lukurra inaduge
silim lukur-ra i-na-b-dug-en
greetings foreigner-DAT 3SG-3M.DAT-3N.OO-do-1SG.S
Greetings to the foreigner to him it do I
I greet he who is the foreigner
Ĝa me, Eannatum me
ĝa-e me-en, eannatum me-en
1SG-ERG be-1SG.S, Enneatum be-1SG.S
I am I, I am Enneatum
I indeed am myself Enneatum
Ensi Lagaš, En Kienĝi, Lugal Kalamma
ensik lagaš-ak, en kienĝir-ak, lugal kalam-ak
ruler Lagash-GEN, lord land-lord-native-GEN, king land-GEN
Ruler of Lagash, Lord of the land of the native lords, King of the land
Ruler of Lagash, Lord of Sumer, King of (all) the lands (of Sumer/Mesopotamia)
Inim ḫamabe
inim ḫa-ma-e-b-ˀe-en
word MOD-1SG.DAT-2SG-3N.OO-do:IPFV-2SG.S
The words shall to me you it do you
You shall speak (your words) to me
Instead of Lugal Kalamma, we could call him Lugal Kissa (?) or King of Kish, to show that he rules a union of Sumer and Akkad. Can't we? The En Kiengi might be unnecessary. So something like "Silim lukurra inaduge! Nga me, Eannatum me: Ensi Lagash ma Lugal Kissa. Inim hhamabe."
I hope I got this right![]()
Kiš-ak would probably be pronounced just plain Kiš, but I think Kiš uses -ki rather than -ak idiomatically, so it would become something like Kišši in context. I believe your construction isn't be wrong, but rather unimpressive for a Sumerian title. I based the titles off of that of Enshakushanna, who was considered previous hegemon of Sumer. As the new hegemon, I assumed Eannatum would also adopt the titles, rather than just stating he was king of Kish, considering he conquered all Sumer. "En Kienĝi Lugal Kalamma" is believed to be an earlier equivalent to "Lugal Kienĝi Kiuri" which would be King of Sumer and Akkad, so I thought that would be apt.
King of kish might not sound very impressive, but it was a pretty big deal. It meant that Sumer and Akkad were united into one entity, and that they were under the rule of the bearer of such a title.
In effect, it means "King of Kings; Ruler of Sumer and Akkad; Emperor"
Eannatum wasn't the most grandiose with titles, either. He personally styled himself as "Lugal whom Ningirsu Loves," I believe.
You guys give hope to a Sumerian civ. It seems like language is not really an issue here. I bet Hittite dialogue could be created as well (we know enough of their language). It's when you have civs like the Minoans or Harappans (where the writing is not translated at all) where issues arise.
"Ensi Lagaš, Lugal Kišši" would be correct, then. "ma" is unnecessary, as these are used for identity. I understand that this would mean "Hegemon of Sumer" in these times, as Akkad was not yet established, so it is a decent equivalent of Emperor.
To be specific to Eannatum, then he would use a different name in inscriptions depicting combat and war, Ḫumma. So it seems it would be best to equate the title of Ensi to Eannatum and Lugal to Ḫumma, as so:
Ĝa me, Eannatum me Ensika Lagaš, Ḫumma me Lugalla Kišši
ĝa-e me-en, eannatum me-en ensik-am lagaš-ak, ḫumma me-en lugal-am kiš-ki
Which would be the equivalent of "I am indeed I who am Eannatum, he being Ensi of Lagaš, who am Ḫumma, he being Lugal of Kiš".
What do you think?
Dammit Irkalla, release it already.
Dammit Irkalla, release it already.
Seconded. Voice can be added when we actually can mod it in, but there's no point waiting months to release a finished product for something which might not even work
Sumeria!
WTH I thought you guys were going nuts over Rome II, what happened?
I don't think More Civs is too worried about languages. I'm not even sure if I want to bother doing Tuscany's lines, and that'd be laughably easy.
Ah, that's the beauty of mods![]()
But for developers, civs are Minoan and Harappan are impossible (unless they use a form of Greek (the Minoan language seems to be non-Indo European) and a Dravidian language for Harappan (no definite clues to the Indus Valley language affinity, some even claim its Indo-European)
Didn't stop them from including the Huns, when we have next to no info concerning the Hunnic language.
Already played 7 hours so far, I'm not completely abandoning the forums yet