The camps were created with the antithesis of ownership. I assume that if you are a proponent of materialist theory, "something new" should have evolved? I don't believe, once the ability of ownership is attained, it can't simply be stripped (and here, i am referring to an individual not to society).
Is that in line with your previous post, where you were saying that it was the dogma that was creating the camps, and so therefore intolerance?
It seems much more likely to me that in-groups creating themselves to exploit outgroups, and high rank groups maintaining their rank through coercion, bear a greater burden of responsibility for intolerance.