Zack Mafia IV: Birthday Bash [GAME THREAD]

oh wait that makes no sense guiz. unvote, vote spaceman

Why??


Sorry for the triple post, I ment to quote Kennigit in post 2, but quoted Xenoneb instead.:blush:
 
vote: spaceman. He's survived too many times with innocents lynched instead. At best, he's a distraction.
 
vote:spaceman88

I'm really sick of people like Unvote; Vote: classical_hero skating past the WoG with a minimum amount of activity like that. Maybe if we sacrfice him to the great Zack god then the updates will return. :please:
 
Well, spaceman, you're the original "soreman", so as we need more info on this, your lynch can provide it. Also, NinjaCow, we lynched one person with sores who was a Vanilla Townie, Mat93. Apparently, this town is eager to lynch non-primary targets, since spaceman and Visorslash should have died instead of Mat and Dreadnought.
 
Well, spaceman, you're the original "soreman", so as we need more info on this, your lynch can provide it. Also, NinjaCow, we lynched one person with sores who was a Vanilla Townie, Mat93. Apparently, this town is eager to lynch non-primary targets, since spaceman and Visorslash should have died instead of Mat and Dreadnought.

I'm not sure. Honestly, I don't believe that "Loyal to the Town" and "Vanilla Innocent" are the same things as being a Townie. Just a gut feeling and the knowledge that this is Zack Mafia.
 
Mat93 was
Spoiler :
Vanilla Townie!
But in fact he was...
Spoiler :
Vanilla Innocent! Wait, they are the same thing!
 
Mat93 was
Spoiler :
Vanilla Townie!
But in fact he was...
Spoiler :
Vanilla Innocent! Wait, they are the same thing!

Rule One: Zack lies.
 
Zack the player, not Zack the GM. Or so said the rules...
 
Note: Due to the nature of this game, anything anyone tells you -- including and perhaps especially myself -- is unreliable and cannot necessarily be trusted. HOWEVER, I promise everything in the rules is reliable and trustworthy.

Quoted for truth. Besides, he lied about people's alignment after death in Zack Mafia II anyway.
 
What is this "it" you are refering to? The sores? No one new has gotten sores in days, I have no ability to spread them. Moreover, we lynched a person with sores and the reval said he is no cultist. Besides, would a cult leader be this obvious? Or is "it" the efforts to lynch me? Perhaps those lynching me are the real scum. You yourself say that they may be using me to divert attention. So, lynch them!

The "it" is the efforts to lynch you, and, unfortunately, it is easier to lynch you in one go than spend the rest of the game lynching those repeating the old case against you. At best, you're scum, at worst, the scum have to find another tree to hide behind.
 
Aww, I died without even an interesting description to tell of my heroic defeat!

I BLAME THE TAKHISIS
 
vote:spaceman88

I'm fine with voting for spaceman, but this is ridiculous, and lurkers are the reason this game is going wrong. vote: classical_hero

If classical_hero simply gives one reason, I'll switch my vote.
 
Visorslash, reason stated below.

Visorslash, for continually voting people with no attempt to justify why.

Vote: Dreadnought

:hmm:

Nice job using this to not contribute....

Anyway, the first thing that springs to mind with 'loyal' to the town, is either A), power role, or B) there is a cult and these guys can't be converted. Or something like that.

Unless Zack chose that wording to mess with us (Host confirmation, danke), we can read something into 'loyal' I think.

Anyway, to start off: Vote: Takhisis
 
Interesting of you to abstain, Zack.
 
NinjaCow64: 1 (Verarde)
Visorslash: 3 (MartinLuther, Takhisis, Dumanios )
Spaceman: 5 (Buddhafish, johnhughthom, Kennigit, classical_hero, Mergle)
Dumanios: 2 (CivCube, spaceman98)
Mechaerik: 1 (Xenoneb)
classical_hero: 1 (NinjaCow64)
Abstain: 1 (Zack)

Tally Slavery...
 
Back
Top Bottom