Berzerker
Deity
which apparently caused Mark Levin to call the Rock a "self-righteous egomaniac"
which is all the more hilarious if you've ever watched Levin
which apparently caused Mark Levin to call the Rock a "self-righteous egomaniac"
Was anybody expecting a 'Great Moments in Political Speeches' from the Rock?The Rock says absolutely nothing and Kamala and Joe smile fakely and grossly and pretend they're his buds
Unrelated, Ventura was an interesting governor of Minnesota. Minnesota politics had been a revolving door of centrist Democrats and Republicans representing all the old timber and grain barons. Venture came in and broke that setup, dragging the DFL and state Republicans into 'modern politics'. He was also rather influential in revitalizing Metro Transit through developing light rail (indeed, a train appears on his official portrait).Jesse - The Body - Ventura> The Rock
Who does Glossu Rabban support?
I find it hilarious that Republicans are ****ting on the Rocks endorsement, because oh celebrity Democrats, when it is Republicans that have twice now run celebrities for President, (Reagan and Trump).
Just because the victim co-operates does not mean that it is not a crime.
The victims are the people, who went alogn quietly instead of forming workers' councils and eating the rich.No he was never a victim, especially since he was in a more powerful position than any of them. He willingly forfeited the legal right to nominate he had over them at the time. Now because it was likely done over being pressured it shows not victimhood but weakness. Plus its not a crime if he wimped out and waivered his right like any coward would do.
Let us remember that this is the crazed millionaire who's seeking to colonise the night sky with a fleet of satellites of his own which nobody ever asked him for and which, as he defines himself as ‘economically right-of-centre’, he's only doing for a profit, but he's still viewed by some as a champion of the green left.
Elon Musk says he may vote for Trump, despite saying climate crisis is existential threat
Tesla boss waiting until debates to decide his vote
With just five weeks to go until the US presidential election, Elon Musk is still an undecided voter.
Speaking to the New York Times' Kara Swisher on Monday, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO offered up a cagey answer when asked if he would be voting for Donald Trump.
"Um, let's just see how the debates go," Mr Musk said on Ms Swisher's new podcast, Sway.
When the host asked Mr Musk why the debates — the first of which is slated for Tuesday — will be the determining factor for his vote, he answered, "I think that's probably the thing that will decide things for America. I think people just want to see if Biden's got it together. … If he does, he probably wins."
Mr Musk went on to describe his political views as "socially very liberal and then economically right of centre, maybe, or center? I don't know. Obviously I'm not a communist".
When it comes to Tesla and electric cars, Mr Trump has been "as supportive as he can be", Mr Musk claimed, given the massive support he has from the oil and gas industries.
"I have spoken to the president about sustainable energy many times," Mr Musk said. "There are times when he's been supportive, but then, at the end of the day, he has got way more support from the oil and gas industry because it's way bigger. The electric car industry is small."
Mr Musk's comments may come as a surprise, considering he's long championed sustainable energy and fighting climate change, neither of which have been priorities for the Trump administration. In 2017, he gave up his seat on Mr Trump's advisory council after the president decided to pull out of the Paris Climate Agreement.
However, the president and the billionaire entrepreneur have recently appeared to be on good terms again. Earlier this year, Mr Trump attended the SpaceX and NASA astronaut launch in Florida, and he publicly defended Mr Musk's calls to resume production at Tesla's California plant amid the coronavirus pandemic.
Back in 2016, Mr Musk didn't publicly support Mr Trump's presidential campaign. In fact, the Tesla boss said at the time that Mr Trump was "probably not the right guy" to lead the country because he "doesn't seem to have the sort of character that reflects well on the United States." Mr Musk did, however, previously back others for the 2020 presidential race, including Andrew Yang and Kanye West.
...the Tesla and SpaceX CEO offered up a cagey answer when asked if he would be voting for Donald Trump ...
Earth and Water. A simple token of your submission. Mix them together and you have mud.
Showing signs of common sense.
Declaring support for one candidate means annoying up to half your
potential customers, and the other candidate particularly if he wins.
So that was how the spartans held the pass for so long, they got the Persians bogged down in mud.
The self-proclaimed "whistleblower" at the heart of James O'Keefe's latest scheme has a conviction for immigration fraud and created his nonprofit right as O'Keefe's sting revved up.
I don't think that's quite comparable. The president does have the right to make appointments to the offices you mention; the issue in this case is that his appointments were not subject to appropriate oversight. The ruling is not that Trump attempt to exercise a power which is not legitimately possessed by the executive branch, but that in exercising this power he did not follow the correct procedure.You're right, he'd theoretically be out. But then again, most of his 'acting appointments' are also illegal and yet nothing is done. Yesterday a court finally removed the acting head of the Burea of Land Management who was illegally appointed....500 days ago.
We have to stop thinking in terms of what is legal for Trump to do and instead think in terms of what he can get away with. If the GOP Senate* does not move to stop him from installing himself for a second term, he will. At that point we only have the courts to fall back on and with a 6-3 SCOTUS (with 3 of those 6 being Trump appointees), we can't count on that either. And we can't discount that he would just ignore a court order as well.
His handling of the situation didn't kill them, they simply killed themselves for refusing to wear a mask.
If trump looses - couldnt he just claim voter fraud in swing states with republican governeurs so the rep gov sends the number of electoral votes (instead of the voters)?