93 movie remakes in the works...

:bump:

Apparently Clive Barker is going to have Hellraiser 1 remade.
Afaik another of his works, Candyman, has recently been remade.
Maybe Barker recently woke up from a sex/alcohol/drugs/other induced coma, but imo he is an average writer at best and the idea to have remakes of his movies isn't going to help with anything. Let alone that Hellraiser has by now 9 movies, of which only two are half-decent, and had been a joke for decades now :)

Spoiler :
"The doctor recommends... Amputation!"
 
Why haven't they remade the Ten Commandments yet?

Come on Hollywood.. Imagine "LET MY PEOPLE GO" and "TO THE CHARIAT" being yelled out by Arnie

The potential for sequels is endless as well. Bear with me here but.. THE ELEVENTH COMMANDMENT
 
Why haven't they remade the Ten Commandments yet?

Come on Hollywood.. Imagine "LET MY PEOPLE GO" and "TO THE CHARIAT" being yelled out by Arnie

The potential for sequels is endless as well. Bear with me here but.. THE ELEVENTH COMMANDMENT
The Eleventh Commandment: Thou shalt not remake Charlton Heston's classic movies, even when the most famous one gets funnier every time I see it.*


*I got a few good lolpics out of screenshots from The Ten Commandments and Ben-Hur.


That said, parody movies are okay. I still like Wholly Moses! (a spoof of The Ten Commandments).
 
This thread having been resurrected, I read the whole thing, and this jumped out at me:
But I do have to snicker that Dune isn't on that list. Kevin J. Anderson was so sure a few years ago (as was Byron Merritt, who runs the official Dunenovels forum) that not only one Dune movie, but three, were going to be made soon (the plan was to break the first novel into three movies). It's also a bit off-putting, too - this is a huge part of the reason that a Spanish-language Dune fan film was issued a cease-and-desist order. So the people doing the fan film got C&D'd basically for nothing.
Of course you weren't to know when you posted what was going to happen six years down the line (and how often do we hear creators/directors raving about projects that are going to be made "real soon, for sure, we have a great script and we'd love to do this!" — and then nothing ever happens?), but the irony-with-hindsight of the quoted made me smile a little.
 
This thread having been resurrected, I read the whole thing, and this jumped out at me:Of course you weren't to know when you posted what was going to happen six years down the line (and how often do we hear creators/directors raving about projects that are going to be made "real soon, for sure, we have a great script and we'd love to do this!" — and then nothing ever happens?), but the irony-with-hindsight of the quoted made me smile a little.
I've been taking quite a walk down memory lane tonight - just finished reading a 7-page thread in Site Feedback about who gets to start serial threads (this happened in 2010). It's sometimes hilarious to see how things change over the course of a few years or a decade.

I still think it's a damn shame about that Spanish fan film. The people who made it joined our forum and they were some of the friendliest Dune fans I've ever encountered. They had an interesting take on the Corrino family, and cast not only Shaddam and Irulan, but the rest of them as well.

If CBS/Paramount can work out a way for both commercial Star Trek movies and TV series and Star Trek fan films to coexist (the rules became insanely strict after the Axanar debacle, in which the producer simultaneously "diverted" a lot of the crowd-funding money he'd raised and tried to profit from CBS/Paramount/Roddenberry's estate's copyrights)... then surely the HLP could allow small Dune fan films to be done, right?

Nah, of course not. Can't have the fans creating better stories than the pros.
 

This is ridiculous. The old Poirot films were fine already - particularly the Orient Express one which they remade with far less significant stars.

Looks terrible and boring :(
 

This looks like all kinds of stupid.

The original did work, to a degree, but only because it wasn't a random slasher (and I doubt it is the kind of film that can be improved with remakes).
 

This looks like all kinds of stupid.

The original did work, to a degree, but only because it wasn't a random slasher (and I doubt it is the kind of film that can be improved with remakes).
Texas Chainsaw Massacre has always been a "B" movie.......I think.
 
TCM worked cos it was really scary for it's time.
I wasn't too impressed by the final bits, but Hoopers tension buildup before was superb.
Along with good scenery picking..one of those movies where i really felt "there".

And maybe most important: seemingly abandoned landscapes. Windmills..no random peoples..no glimmer of hope.
Today's horror films can still learn something from TCM.
 
TCM worked cos it was really scary for it's time.
I wasn't too impressed by the final bits, but Hoopers tension buildup before was superb.
Along with good scenery picking..one of those movies where i really felt "there".

And maybe most important: seemingly abandoned landscapes. Windmills..no random peoples..no glimmer of hope.
Today's horror films can still learn something from TCM.
I thought the novel thing TCM did was the unexpectedness of the violence. Other films at the time would have told you about the upcoming shock, with the music or setup or whatever. In TCM it kind of came out of nowhere, and was pretty effective at the time.
 
Back
Top Bottom