I got into an odd argument with a friend regarding thoughts and assumptions. I won't bored you with the details, so I'll just pose the question to you: Do you believe that all thoughts are themselves assumptions?
Thoughts originate as the transduction of a sensory signal: the conversion of an incredibly complex external world into a signal that's basically digital. The coding of a sensory input is, by its nature, a simplistic assumption about the outside world. The utility of this assumption has been tested through hundreds of millions of years of evolution, but it's still an assumption. Better techniques for assuming are (almost) always selected for, but it's an imperfect signal. We build thoughts off of this imperfection.
The great metacognitive leap is to realise that your thoughts don't accurately represent reality.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.