Alternate History Thread V

APPROV'D

Chamberlain’s legacy of free trade,

A bit confused by this part. Are you sure we're talking about the same Chamberlain here? :p

The Russian position in the Balkans Wars is rather unclear. While it makes sense that it would ultimately come to terms with their allies on the matter, you'd think Russia would be a bit more willing to throw its weight around in the Balkans in this scenario. More or less ignoring it seems strange.

Also, just what is the status of Libya by 1915?
 
Really good read. I was never aware the Beiyang Army was of such quality as to equal the forces of France, Japan, or Russia. Is that specifically excepting Germany and the British Empire, or would they find a match in the Beiyang Army too? In the British and French frustration with the political system, I hear echoes of how you referred to the German frustration with the political system in 1914. Am I near the mark? I didn't really like how a world war was ignited quite similarly to the OTL one. Maybe that's the point.
 
A bit confused by this part. Are you sure we're talking about the same Chamberlain here? :p
Ha. More like "he brought up the free trade issue and it split the party". But yeah, it is indeed Big Joe.
das said:
The Russian position in the Balkans Wars is rather unclear. While it makes sense that it would ultimately come to terms with their allies on the matter, you'd think Russia would be a bit more willing to throw its weight around in the Balkans in this scenario. More or less ignoring it seems strange.
Yeah, I've been wrestling with that. Most of the foreign policy goals that I can see the Russians having are kind of unattainable short of war, though - things like Izvolsky's Straits project (lol) - and a lot of the rest are things that kinda detract from the narrative at this point. For instance, in the post-Second Balkan War environment, both Austria and Russia have been working at forming Balkan Leagues (Austria to solidify its attempts to control the region, Russia to provide a stick with which to hit the Ottomans) and have been butting heads about that (partially from differing interpretations as to How The Balkans Should Work, partially because their goals are, obviously, different), but I figured it made more sense to mention that when the Balkan campaigns in the Eurasian War start. It probably would've been opportune to mention it as an indication of how the Three Emperors' League was far from a cohesive organization on anything like the same level as the Entente powers, but I guess I dropped the ball there.
das said:
Also, just what is the status of Libya by 1915?
Good question. Enver is back home, obviously, no longer leading the resistance. His departure permitted the resistance to develop something of a more explicitly Libyan (i.e. non-Ottoman) character; some of the more obviously Ottomanist resistance leaders, like Sulayman al-Baruni, were pushed out, and the Senussi under Ahmad al-Sharif more or less took charge. Italy's troop contingents actually decreased from their peak in 1910-11, going from 100,000 to about 75,000 by the outbreak of the Eurasian War, but improved leadership and the turmoil after Enver's departure contributed to the Italians successfully wiping out the resistance in Tripolitania and western Cyrenaica, although the east and south, as well as Fezzan, are still controlled by the resistance.

Since it's highly unlikely at best that the Ottomans will pull their little jihad act in this Eurasian War, and since once again the Italians and British will be Super Friends, the Senussi will probably be squished in 1916 or so. Shame. :(
Really good read. I was never aware the Beiyang Army was of such quality as to equal the forces of France, Japan, or Russia. Is that specifically excepting Germany and the British Empire, or would they find a match in the Beiyang Army too?
The Beiyang Army's drilling, cohesion, and (after 1913) their equipment is more or less on a par with that of, say, Russia or Japan. It suffers from a shortage of officers, which is a problem that any war-fighting army has (not to mention one that has to rely on foreign military academies for training); in this respect, it's somewhat similar to the French army of OTL after the army law of 1913. In terms of theory and doctrinal influence, I'd put money on the German or British regular army, though, because both of those forces have made conscious efforts to keep the regular army small with a high proportion of officers to men, good marksmanship, and lavishly well supplied with top notch equipment. I'll spend several interminable paragraphs on the opposing armies, especially the ones on the Western Front, at the beginning of the Eurasian War section.

Incidentally, the Western Front has pretty dramatically diverged from the original so far. If you blame anybody, blame Terence Zuber for causing it. ;)
Yui108 said:
In the British and French frustration with the political system, I hear echoes of how you referred to the German frustration with the political system in 1914. Am I near the mark?
Absolutely. My apologies to Hew Strachan and Paul Schroeder among others. :p
Yui108 said:
I didn't really like how a world war was ignited quite similarly to the OTL one. Maybe that's the point.
How else could a world war be started, though? Less a megalomaniacal personality on the scale of a Hitler, and when you have to deal with a fairly resilient international system (insofar as one can even refer to 'systems' of course) that's really freaking good at preventing a general war, you have to rely on the breakdown of otherwise reasonable men who simply decide that peace isn't worth the effort anymore. Any other attempt to get a world war has to start there. I don't see a way around it. :dunno:

Anyway, now that I'm back and I has a computer again, I've started writing again. Huzza!
 
I love how I completely missed this while I was vacating.

Reading now, might have something cogent to say eventually but probably not. :3

Though if this could somehow butterfly into Roosevelt becoming Eternal President I don't think I nor anyone else will complain. :p
 
I was asked for a map, and here it is:
Spoiler world map :
biOFY.png
 
First actually cogent thing to say:

While this might not be your area of expertise, I feel like domestic political fallout from the Japanese losses in the Treaty of Portsmouth would have been really significant, and wasn't really touched upon. From the Japanese viewpoint of things, they really got a bum deal in that treaty, despite their "glorious victory" at Port Arthur.
 
Mainly even though they lost in the end, how badly did they lose comparitively. Was it possible to save face to any degree?

If they were able to make peace while saving face at home the domestic situation might not be all that affected aside from the changing of the guard while not changing the mentaility much if at all.

But, yes it could also have been drastic depending on how they could spin it in Japan.
 
Certainly a Russian victory would have come as no surprise to anyone except Japan. But they maintained total seaborne superiority, captured Port Arthur, and lost Korea. It's not really a good post-war outcome for them, despite acquitting themselves well, if not as well as in OTL. I see no scenario in which high-level heads would not have rolled.
 
Yes, but that's what I am saying they might change the guard in the leadership, but the actual political policy would likely be little changed is what I mean. You would probably simply be replacing the heads with their proteges.
 
What is the High Seas Fleet like compared to OTL?

You mention that Sammlungspolitik breaks down in 1912, but then the German military is expanded substantially beginning in late 1914. What is the net effect?
 
First actually cogent thing to say:

While this might not be your area of expertise, I feel like domestic political fallout from the Japanese losses in the Treaty of Portsmouth would have been really significant, and wasn't really touched upon. From the Japanese viewpoint of things, they really got a bum deal in that treaty, despite their "glorious victory" at Port Arthur.
Instability and ministerial discontinuity - combined with policy continuity - remained more or less the same. Katsura Tarō spent a lot more time in the doghouse and a lot less time in the premiership, but formed the Dōshikai (albeit earlier). Saionji Kinmochi and the Seiyūkai still formed their alliance with the Navy, and retained a grip on power for longer, but general consensus held that the army needed to be rebuilt for a second go at Russia. The Navy is more or less where it was in OTL in terms of fleet construction.

Frankly, the net effect on Japanese policy from domestic-political affairs was minimal, as it tended to be with Japan in the late Meiji and Taishō periods. Japanese parties and prime ministers came and went; the overall thrust of policy remained rather disturbingly consistent.
Certainly a Russian victory would have come as no surprise to anyone except Japan. But they maintained total seaborne superiority, captured Port Arthur, and lost Korea. It's not really a good post-war outcome for them, despite acquitting themselves well, if not as well as in OTL. I see no scenario in which high-level heads would not have rolled.
High-level heads rolled all the time. (In some cases, like Nogi Maresuke's, they did so literally.) The Japanese couldn't manage a consistent government to save their lives; Katsura Tarō never managed to rule consistently for more than two years, while the genial Katō Takaaki fell a mere two years after he achieved the most brilliant diplomatic successes of the First World War. It didn't really matter.
What is the High Seas Fleet like compared to OTL?

You mention that Sammlungspolitik breaks down in 1912, but then the German military is expanded substantially beginning in late 1914. What is the net effect?
The net effect is to cause the fall of Bethmann and an apparent shift in the German government's willingness to compromise on foreign affairs; it also brings the Center party into a close alignment with the government while - for the moment - keeping the far right not totally opposed. (Except for the Pan-Germans, but they were opposed to everything.) This partially resolves the governmental deadlock that faced Bethmann in OTL up to the outbreak of war. In terms of military budgets, the main effect is on the navy's, which dries up rather dramatically in 1912-3 (causing, for one thing, Tirpitz's fall from grace - even more so than in OTL - which has serious planning implications for the High Seas Fleet); while the army budget does increase in 1914, it funds not an expansion of regular troops, but munitions outlays, due to the policy of Moltke, Heeringen, and Eichhorn. Eichhorn replaces Heeringen, since Falkenhayn is, conveniently, in China. (With Bethmann no longer around to try to use the army as a stick with which to beat Tirpitz, and with Schlieffen's effect on war planning dramatically constricted, the army does not fund the significant numerical expansion that it did in OTL 1912-4. Thus, Germany's army remains, as it was in the days of Einem, a relatively small - compared to France's army; 'small' in Western European standards still gives you a million men after mobilization - long-service professional force.)

As for the High Seas Fleet, it is commanded at the outbreak of war by Friedrich von Ingenohl, with planning in the hands of Hugo von Pohl. While the deliberations in the Reichstag and Tirpitz's relative fall put a wrench in his budgetary plans, Tirpitz had successfully managed to regularize naval production for the next few years, thus leaving the High Seas Fleet at about the same position it was in in OTL, numerically speaking (obviously not having suffered the losses by April 1915 that it had in OTL); it does have slightly fewer U-boats than in OTL, and one extra battle cruiser for Hipper's squadron, but these are relatively trivial considerations. The impact of the 1914 budgetary realignment will not make itself felt for a few more years; four Bayern-class superdreadnoughts were laid down following the new naval budget, and are scheduled to be completed between February and August 1918. Therefore, the most obvious short-term effects of the budget are in terms of training - which the High Seas Fleet wished to prioritize anyway after 1911 to bring personnel quality up with ship numbers and quality (Tirpitz blocked this in OTL) - and general battle readiness. Doctrinally, the High Seas Fleet is in a bit of a quandary, with (roughly speaking) Ingenohl preferring a more active role for the fleet (not going quite so far as, say, Wegener or Baudissin) and Pohl repeating the Kaiser's line about not wanting to lose precious naval resources.
 
The Outbreak of the Eurasian War.

The belief that any coming Great War would be short – by necessity, if nothing else – was quite prevalent in the years before the assassination of Sevket. Authors like Norman Angell and Jan Bloch argued that any conflict would be disastrous, nay, impossible, because of the rate at which a state’s resources would be consumed. Financially, no country could afford to fight for more than a few months before fiscal collapse left its armies and fleets at a standstill. If anything, the evidence of the Manchurian war confirmed this: Japan’s army in the field had been defeated, but many analysts claimed it was Japanese financial exhaustion – which sparked a stock market crash in the spring of 1905 – which had forced Japan to make peace.

At the same time, in military terms, it was becoming increasingly apparent to some officers in the armies of both the Entente and the League that a new war was likely to be long and drawn out. The evidence of the American Civil War and the Franco-Prussian War – and indeed even the Russo-Japanese War – made it clear that a modern field army was almost impossible to destroy. And even given a victory on the scale of a Sedan, one’s opponent could almost always raise fresh armies. But the consequences of a long war were clear: devastating attrition, economic and social collapse, and, as in France in 1870-1, revolution.

For some, like the German Chief of the General Staff from 1891 to 1906, Alfred von Schlieffen, the path was clear. A long war would be avoided because it had to be avoided. Schlieffen’s prescription for Germany’s troubles during his tenure (a two-front war against France and Russia) had been a massive attack on France, marching through Belgium and the Netherlands, to destroy the French army as quickly as possible so as to turn on Russia. It was risky, yes, argued Schlieffen, but waiting until a British blockade starved Germany of resources, or until the French and Russians could crush Germany between their massive armies, had a certain success rate of zero.

The war that faced European officers in 1915 was not Schlieffen’s war. Germany had lost one front – the war against Russia – but now saw itself faced with a multiplicity of global hotspots, each individually of lesser magnitude than a war against Russia but in aggregate possibly far greater. Russia no longer had to deal with the Germans on their eastern frontier, but instead with a near-continuous front stretching from the Caucasus across the entire breadth of Asia to Vladivostok. Britain and France had to sustain both a war in Western Europe but one that embraced almost all of their colonial possessions.

With the fronts so widely spaced, with logistics virtually nightmarish, the likelihood of a knockout blow was even lower than it had been before. To mobilize their armies, Russia or the United Kingdom would have to spend months shuttling troops to their various fronts; Japan was only slightly better off, and the Ottoman Empire was far worse. There was only one place where either side could even hope to score a fast, decisive victory: Western Europe, where railroads were denser, troop numbers were higher, and where France and Germany both lay potentially vulnerable to a quick exit. So while the war had started over the Caucasus, the world’s attention initially shifted over to Alsace and Lorraine.

It was clear that the French would be taking the offensive. While Germany had the luxuries of concentrating on the Western Front and of a larger economy, resource base, and manpower base from which to draw, France’s army was front-loaded, designed to work best in the shock of the initial blows of combat. It had been the French, learning from Prussia’s mobilization in 1870, who had developed their rail lines to the Vosges, ensuring that France could get more troops to the frontier faster than could the Germans. France’s three-year law of 1914 had increased the trained manpower theoretically available for the initial campaigns. And most famously – if inaccurately – it was French theorists like Ferdinand Foch and Loyzeaux de Grandmaison who were known as the apostles of the offensive, who claimed that morale, the will to win – élan – was the key to modern war.

This so-called “spirit of the offensive” deserves some mention, for it is often reported that this meant that French – and German, Russian, Chinese, and so forth – soldiers were imbued with the foolish notion that only repeated incessant attacking could erode a defense based on modern firepower. Military tacticians the world over are supposed to have recognized the power of modern weapons like machine guns, high explosives, heavy artillery, and the like and decided that the only solution was to throw warm bodies at them. Only later in the war – with stormtroop and infiltration tactics properly developed – did generals have any idea as to how to fight a modern infantry war. This is used as part of a general indictment of the ostensibly idiotic European military leadership of the war era.

But the basic conception behind modern infantry tactics was already there long before 1915. European generals in France, Germany, and even Russia had already decided that the key to advancing in the teeth of a modern defense was to build up fire support against the enemy, to (if possible) pressure his flanks, advance your infantry by bounds as close as possible, and then to rush forward to drive the enemy out of his positions. So-called stormtroop or infiltration tactics were merely variations on this central theme, making use of specially trained detachments. Correctly applied, these tactics worked just fine for armies in Europe even in 1915. As an example, the French 41st Division, commanded by an officer with a sound understanding of the 1911 field regulations, attacked an German force of equal size in entrenched positions on the Meurthe River on September 9, 1915; within four hours the Germans were driven out of their positions, the French suffering three dead and sixty-two wounded.

Grandmaison, whose 1906 booklet was most castigated by later historians, actually emphasized the role of artillery support. Furthermore, he flatly stated that “a frontal attack across open ground [was] impossible”. In stating such things, Grandmaison was hardly breaking ground; theoreticians around Europe had understood the difficulty of attacking modern entrenched positions for decades. Grandmaison’s point was that, in order to succeed, even with the help of artillery, fire support from other infantry and machine guns, and flanking detachments, the infantry had to deal with immense pressures unlike any other in previous wars: they had to believe they could succeed in order for any of the modern tactics to work.

What the French army’s problem was, was that it failed to distinguish between a specific problem – grunt poilus mustering up the courage to storm the last hundred yards on a modern fire-swept battlefield – and a more generalized one, that of the operational problem of fighting Germany. Grandmaison did an excellent job at resolving the former; he provided no assistance with the latter. Therefore, up to 1914, war planning was left up to Victor Michel, the vice-president of the Conseil Supérieur de Guerre; his Plan XVII, completed in 1911, rested on a short-term defense of the eastern fortress line – Verdun-Toul-Épinal-Belfort – with a sizable mobile reserve in case the Germans invaded Belgium to circumvent the fortresses. Michel’s fall in 1914 brought a new war plan into being, Plan XVIII, which was later associated with the alleged idiotic belief in the spirit of the offensive.

Michel’s fall came not over any issues of defense or offense, but over his management of the army. Part and parcel of Plan XVII was a decision to increase the number of reservists in the front line of the army. With the military still reeling from the Dreyfus affair, graduation from military academies had slumped, while funding was nowhere to be found for reserve training (over a third of reservists did not even report to the colors in 1913). Much of the French military establishment was worried with Michel’s apparent preference for quantity over quality; fearing the dilution of trained men, they opposed the employment of reservists in the front line. Furthermore, Michel did not plan to increase the amount of artillery in the army, over the protests of Auguste Dubail, the munitions chief – again, an issue of quantity over quality. And Michel’s reservist proposals wouldn’t even be able to take full effect for several years; in the midst of the Zabern and Gough crises, with war apparently imminent, CSG was preoccupied with combat readiness. Michel had to go.

His replacement, Joseph Joffre, was the most senior available ‘safe’ general, unassociated as he was with either Michel himself or the scandal of the affaire des fiches in 1904 (which tarred Joseph-Simon Gallieni and Paul-Marie Pau respectively). Joffre, a somewhat enigmatic figure who spoke little and wrote less, may have achieved his initial position based on his republican credentials (always a concern after the Dreyfus affair), but his subsequent actions showed a clear intent to make the French military war-ready, carried out with considerable energy. His part in the passage of the Three-Year Law in the fall of 1914 combined a willingness to increase the size of the mobilized front line army with a commitment to maintaining quality. Adolphe Messimy, the war minister, also improved Joffre’s ability to coordinate policy by abolishing the CSG and placing Joffre at the head of both the general staff and the army’s professional organization.

Joffre’s chief accomplishment, however, was Plan XVIII. Contrary to later belief, the plan’s main goal was not a suicidal attack into German Lorraine but rather a further refinement of France’s mobilization and concentration plans. Its fruit was a large army placed on the border before the tenth day of mobilization, an amazing feat; the central position of the concentration points, in western Lorraine, combined with the multiplicity of French rail lines, meant that the army could be rapidly redeployed further north, to guard against a thrust through Belgium, or east, to attack into Alsace. If the recommendations for the commander put something of a stress on an offensive into Lorraine, it was because that option was seen as the most practicable – placing a premium on at the very least a spoiling attack to mess up German mobilization and exploit France’s superior mobilization speed and numbers. Nevertheless, combined with the Three-Year Law, Plan XVIII was implemented with little time for the army to readjust its thinking before the outbreak of war.

If the French army’s thought processes were in flux, those of Germany were a disorganized mess, courtesy not of some disaster but of the Kaiser’s diplomatic success with the Treaty of Björkö. Schlieffen had reckoned on a two-front war, and had structured German doctrine to match: speed, firepower, and encirclement were his watchwords, and violating Belgian and Dutch neutrality the logical conclusion of his planning. Schlieffen’s successor Moltke inherited his preoccupation with a quick victory, but with Russia’s alignment towards Germany he also gained a multiplicity of other fronts with which to deal. Moltke was also less single-minded than was Schlieffen; he saw the benefits of other options, from tactics (where he recognized the benefits of breakthrough over encirclement, for instance) to strategy (where he believed that Belgium and the Netherlands were more valuable as neutral parties than enemies, especially since a flank march through the Low Countries would be logistically near-impossible to sustain).

The result was confusion on most points, which Moltke failed to resolve; having elected to avoid extremism on all points of doctrine and war planning, what was left was no unifying tendency at all. But at the same time, Moltke did play a key role in preparing the imperial army for war. He insulated the army from political interference, for one, removing the problems that bedeviled France. After 1907, he prevented the Kaiser from participating in the war games to boost his own vanity. And in the Reichstag, Moltke and the war ministers, Karl von Einem, Josias von Heeringen, and Hermann von Eichhorn, regularized funding increases by focusing on technological and equipment investment rather than increases in army size, resulting in a perpetually well-funded, professional, high-quality army which, unfortunately, was far from matching France’s in terms of numbers. But even this was confusion: if Moltke still counted on a quick win over France (which he did, even if he pessimistically claimed that it was increasingly unlikely), it made no sense to focus on a smaller, long-service professional force to serve as a cadre around which to assemble a larger mobilized army.

Germany’s actual war planning similarly attempted to have it both ways. Moltke recognized the importance of Alsace-Lorraine, and deployed most of Germany’s mobilized army there – but he also was under significant pressure to aid Russia against its many Eurasian foes, and so made provision to deploy several army corps further east. Effectively, Moltke’s plan now rested on a defensive-offensive campaign in Alsace-Lorraine, but his expectations from it – vaguely assuming that the Germans could exploit a victory across the Vosges towards Paris, as they had in 1870 – were almost as unrealistic as Schlieffen’s march across the Low Countries.

Joffre’s armies were mostly concentrated in Lorraine by the eighth day of mobilization, April 12. The operational problem he had to solve was not easy, for it was by no means obvious where the French should attack. For one thing, the German cavalry – as part of Schlieffen’s prewar insistence on the superiority of speed and firepower – was superior to the French; Georg von der Marwitz’s troopers successfully blinded the French attempts at reconnaissance into Lorraine, so Joffre was unsure as to where the German points of concentration were. He had to rely on reasoning based on geography and other obstacles, and these were formidable: the rough terrain of Alsace lay directly to the east, while the Metz-Diedenhofen area was covered by a massive modern system of fortifications, the Moselstellung. Reasoning that the Moselstellung was likely to cover the slower German mobilization, Joffre decided that the main mass of German troops lay behind it, and masked the fortifications with one of his five armies while deploying three to attack between Metz and the Rhine. As it happened, though, the Moselstellung had been developed under Schlieffen’s tenure, to guard the pivot of his great wheel into Belgium; on April 13, the only troops there were a single army corps, reinforced by some Landwehr. With an entire army hanging uselessly in the wind, Joffre was sending two-thirds of his field army into the teeth of the Germans’ real concentration.

What resulted, between April 13 and April 17, was an engagement that is sometimes called either the Battle of Duß (after the name of the town close to the center of most of the fighting) or the Battle of Lorraine (by everybody but the Germans). Joffre’s armies, echeloned to the right, slammed into the advance guards of three German armies, dug in to protect the assembling rear echelons. Unable to gain a good picture of the battlefield – with cavalry forced back and air reconnaissance useless due to persistent mist – the French plunged straight into the teeth of coordinated German machine gun and heavy artillery fire. It was the artillery that really ripped apart the French. Germany had invested heavily in large-caliber, long-range, plunging-fire guns before the war, while the French had focused on their 75s, smaller direct-support guns. On the defensive, the prepositioned German artillery could force the 75s out of range and then turn on the unsupported French infantry. The result was carnage. When the German Second Army appeared on the French eastern flank, Joffre decided the battle was unsalvageable, and successfully broke contact over the night of 17-18 April.

This was, essentially, all according to plan as far as the Germans were concerned. Moltke, at the supreme army command (die oberste Heeresleitung, or OHL) in Koblenz, ordered a pursuit, to take advantage of the weakened state of the French armies. This was harder than it sounded. Thanks to having not engaged his largest single army – Charles Lanrezac’s Third – by leaving it in front of Metz, Joffre was covering his retreat with a sizable and well-supplied force. While Lanrezac’s troops prepared their defenses on the favorable terrain of the Grand Couronné de Nancy, backed by the guns of the fortresses at Toul and Épinal, the rest of the French armies would retreat behind the fortresses to reorganize and reinforce (and to purge many of the less desirable officers). A further problem was that Moltke in Koblenz – forced to deal with the imperial court (as the Kaiser was, after all, der oberste Kriegsherr, the Supreme Warlord) and with operations ranging as far away as China – was unable to maintain tight control over his army commanders in Lorraine. And due to the doctrinal confusion that Moltke himself had perpetuated, the army commanders didn’t even mutually agree on the correct course of action to take.

Beginning on 21 April, the German armies of Alexander von Kluck, Karl von Einem, and Rupprecht, crown prince of Bavaria, staged a fighting crossing of the Meurthe and assaulted Lanrezac’s lines. Due to the geographical nature of the land, most of the German troops were canalized into attacking the Trouée de Charmes, from where they were vulnerable to attack from three sides. And the 75s, which had bedeviled the French advance a week prior, now did sterling service in defending the Third Army’s front. On the offensive, they lacked the range to deal with the German heavy howitzers. But with the German advance outdistancing their artillery support, the 75s could fight on their own: and they were the perfect weapon for close infantry support, able to overwhelm German formations with a vast weight of metal. In ground that wasn’t so broken or wooded as German Lorraine, the 75s could employ ricochet fire, the so-called rafale, that enabled a single battery to lock down twelve hectares in a minute.

These advantages enabled Lanrezac’s troops to hold on despite growing weight of numbers on the German side. But by April 25, the French grip on the Grand Couronné was tenuous; if Nancy fell into German hands, the Trouée de Charmes would be left wide open. Alarmed by Lanrezac’s warnings that he would have to withdraw, Joffre ordered the minuscule Fifth Army, designed originally to mask Alsace, to attack the Germans’ southern flank. Michel-Joseph Maunoury, who had been summoned from retirement to command the army a few days earlier, was able to bring just two corps to bear against the Germans at Baccarat. Two corps, however, was enough. Kluck, worried for his southern flank, had already begun to draw it in, and with actual pressure on it he elected to pull back. Within two days, Rupprecht too had been forced to call off his attacks, and the Germans pulled back behind the Meurthe.

Already, the Germans had begun creating prepared positions in Alsace and Lorraine; with their few miles of hard-won French territory now behind them, they began building fresh entrenchments to free up manpower. Moltke, although now suffering from heart problems, was determined to renew an attempt at mobile warfare. This time, the Germans would try to pass north of Verdun, along the Belgian border. With the equivalent of a heavily reinforced army, the Germans struck at the French in the northern part of the Woëvre, near the Briey ore fields. Although initially resistance was light, as Joffre had expected the Germans to try their luck further south again, a French reserve army was quickly deployed to the area and halted the attack in a series of engagements just east of Verdun during the first two weeks of May. Beginning on May 18, a solid line of entrenchments stretched from the Belgian border near Longwy to the Swiss border near Mülhausen, with little immediate prospect of breakthrough for either side.

Moltke himself did not survive the Battle of the Woëvre for very long. In late May he was ordered to “report sick” by the Kaiser’s adjutant (conveniently, he was feeling pretty sick at the time, probably from the stress of campaigning) and was replaced by the man many people felt should have succeeded Schlieffen in 1906, August von Mackensen. Mackensen was almost immediately forced to deal with French attacks on the Meurthe and the Mortagne, battles which slowly petered out into late June. It was these engagements that convinced Mackensen – and ultimately, the rest of OHL – that there was little chance of securing a quick victory in the west anytime soon. Instead, Germany’s mobilized army should be built for the long game, and deployed to exploit victories elsewhere in the world.

Around the same time Mackensen was deploying those arguments to convince the General Staff and the Kaiser, those allies – namely, Russia, were beginning to engage their own enemies. Based on a totally inadequate rail network, the Russian military had attempted to mobilize well over two million men and disperse them on fronts from Manchuria clear to the Caucasus. In many of those places, the Russians’ enemies were able to move faster. For instance, in Korea the Russians were caught completely flat footed by the Japanese, who, blatantly disrespecting the supposedly sacrosanct rights of neutral nations, demanded to cross Korean territory and use the country as a base from which to fight the Russians. The Gwangmu Emperor’s protests were brushed aside, as was the Korean military, in a lightning campaign from April 16 to May 2 conducted by Field Marshal Oku Yasukata, one of the few IJA senior officers to come out of the Manchurian war with a good reputation. (Oku’s path was made all the smoother by Japanese advance work in Korea, which suborned a sizable portion of the officer corps and civilian administrators, many who had Japanese loyalties from Japan’s period of more official influence before 1905.) Russia’s Manchurian armies, under the overall command of Nikolai Ruzsky, were unable to react quickly enough, and at any rate hadn’t fully assembled yet; the Japanese invasion caught them with their collective pants down, and Oku’s troops were able to successfully secure bridgeheads across the Yalu without major fighting.

The problems of Russia’s slow mobilization were exacerbated by – surprise surprise – doctrinal confusion. Unlike France and Germany, Russia’s armies had recent combat experience, in Manchuria, and the Russians had notably won that war. The problem was assimilating the lessons learned from that war, and making good the (considerable) losses incurred in its fighting. Several years of bureaucratic confusion had finally resulted, in 1912, in the appointment of Vladimir Sukhomlinov to head both the general staff and the war ministry, lending a certain direction to Russian policy. Yet Sukhomlinov, a man genuinely interested in reform, rearmament, and war readiness – albeit on his own terms – was unable to fully resolve all of the conflicts in the army, and even if he had, his ‘Great Program’ would have been far from completion in 1915.

Ultimately, what resulted was a disconnect between military and diplomatic policy on the level of strategy. Sukhomlinov and his chief of staff, Miknevich, both recognized the military value of standing on the defensive. It had good standing in the Russian historical tradition, drawing from examples like the victory against Napoleon in 1812 and Kuropatkin’s defensive-offensive campaign in the Manchurian war. Defensive operations made good sense based on Russia’s slow mobilization as well. But politically, an early defense was suicidal: Russia’s credit in Asia depended largely on an assertive posture, and that meant the strategic offensive.

The navy was, if anything, worse off. Port Arthur and Tsushima had seen the virtual annihilation of Russia’s Baltic and Pacific fleets, making a reconstruction effort both desirable (in the face of Britain’s and Germany’s Dreadnought programs, which began around the same time) and necessary. At first blush, this would have seemed easy: both the tsar and his new ally Cousin Willy were ardent navalists, and the Germans would be more than happy to have Russian naval support. But that was where the conveniences ended. Germany wanted the Russians to build in the Baltic Sea, to support the High Seas Fleet, and the Germans wanted cruisers; the tsar and his naval war staff wanted Dreadnoughts, and Russia’s strategic interests lay in the Black Sea and Far East, not the Baltic, which needed no protection now that Germany was allied to Russia. In addition, the considerable finances that the tsar had devoted to the naval budget were mostly spent on plant, as the Russian naval yards were sadly insufficient for Dreadnought construction. To complete the comedy of errors, the Russian naval minister from 1908, I. K. Grigorovich, wanted to cement the German alliance; he shifted the original plan (Dreadnought-based battle fleets in the Black and Yellow Seas) to a plan that focused on construction in the Baltic to appease the Germans. The result was, by 1915, already-scant resources thinly spread. Russia had two Dreadnoughts in the Baltic, and one in the Black Sea (plus four pre-Dreadnoughts); in the Pacific, a battle cruiser built along German lines had to suffice for a flagship for the Port Arthur squadron.

Thus Russia had little hope of stopping the Japanese from entering Korea, as the IJN ruled the Yellow Sea. It had a slightly better – but still not all that good – hope of messing with the Ottoman deployment to Armenia. Enver’s mobilization was hampered by the fact that the Ottomans had no railheads there; the nearest to the Erzurum concentration point were at Ulu Kischla (700 miles from Erzurum) and Tell Ebaid (400 miles from Erzurum and on the wrong side of the Taurus Mountains). Thus the Ottomans had to rely on seaborne transport to get their troops to Trabzon, from where they could march along the one good local road to Erzurum. Had the Russians had a more aggressive Black Sea Fleet commander, perhaps they could have seriously interfered with Enver’s concentration; as it was, Viktor Kanin, the admiral in charge, worried about being drawn into an engagement with the numerically equivalent Ottoman fleet and restricted his ships to guarding Sevastopol and Batumi.

Even without the Russians interfering, it was not until June that Enver had any sort of army concentrated in Armenia. On the urging of Sir Horace Smith-Dorrien, his chief of staff, Enver had chosen to launch an offensive against the Russian railhead at Sarikamiş, not far from Kars, to be of a piece with a general Entente offensive against the Russians and Qajars in northern Iran spearheaded by Sir John French’s British Expeditionary Force. Enver’s stumbling offensive was significantly aided by the poor command structure in the Russian Caucasus. The Russian viceroy, knyaz Illarion Vorontsov-Dashkov, was uninterested in military affairs; his deputy, Aleksandr Myshlayevsky, was widely seen as an idiot and had in fact been ‘banished’ to the Caucasus by Sukhomlinov to keep him from interfering with the latter’s reform program. Neither was up to the challenge of commanding the regular Caucasus forces deployed for internal security (of which there was a considerable need), let alone the avalanche of Russian army forces to be deployed there a few months from the outbreak of war, and even their office only constituted a primus inter pares over the other small Caucasus commands.

Russia’s overall objective for the Caucasus front was even less clear. Although the war had started over the region, the Russians certainly had no interest in annexing Ottoman Armenia, despite Enver’s bleating to the contrary. The region was poor and in economic decline; it best served Russia as a buffer zone, not a controlled territory. Russian prewar expansion thus focused on northern Iran instead, which was seen as much more valuable. The Caucasus itself was also intrinsically valuable, due to rapidly climbing oil exploitation (Baku was in fact Russia’s busiest port in 1915, ahead of even Odessa). It was also one of Russia’s biggest internal security problems. Sukhomlinov, at the war ministry, reckoned that even of the million-man army scheduled to be deployed to the Caucasus, at least two thirds would have to be used to suppress seditious activity. The region was a hotbed of nationalistic sentiment – not just of the ‘bigger’ would-be countries like Georgia or Armenia or Azerbaijan, but practically every individual valley harbored a new language and a yen for self-determination – as well as socialism and pan-Islam. Nikolai Yudenich, the head of Myshlayevsky’s staff and probably the most competent of the Russian Caucasus command, argued that even after the Ottoman declaration of war, the Russians faced a far greater threat from Georgian valley dwellers than from Enver’s armies.
 
At any rate, despite Yudenich’s insouciance, the Russians made a series of panic moves in response to the Ottoman mobilization. Vorontsov, afraid for the security of the connections to northern Iran, withdrew half of the troops around Tabriz in May before ordering them back three weeks later, with the effect that they took part in no actions until early July. This left the Russians with a total of two corps with which to fight the Ottomans, and Myshlayevsky ordered their commander, Fourth Army chief Aleksei Evert, to attack Enver’s concentrations in the last week of May (over Yudenich’s protests); Evert’s troops blundered into a Turkish firesack in the Çakir Baba Mountains and only narrowly pulled back before being encircled. Enver followed it up by successfully encircling a Russian division at Sarikamiş, inducing a fresh panic at Myshlayevsky’s headquarters at Yerevan. By July 1, although the Russians had now got two incomplete armies massing between Sarikamiş and Kars, Myshlayevsky was preparing to withdraw the Russian armies to the rail junction at Aleksandropol, and perhaps even out of the Lesser Caucasus Mountains.

Even more precipitate than the retreat in the Caucasus was the Russian pull-out from northern Iran. Russia’s only railroad leading into Qajar territory went through Yerevan and Tabriz. Part and parcel of the Ottoman offensive towards Sarikamiş was an advance partway down the Aras River, which threatened the Tabriz line, playing a role in the Amazing Stampeding Russian Army show Myshlayevsky was staging; his fear that the troops around Tehran would be cut off led him to order even further withdrawals. The net result was that the Constitutionalists, having compromised with the British in exchange for support, overran Luristan and much of central Iran south of the great salt desert before overextension and Myshlayevsky changing his mind brought the Entente advance to a halt. Further east, the Russians had taken the offensive, under the general direction of the governor of Turkestan, Aleksandr Samsonov, attempting to overrun Afghanistan as the gateway to India. Habibullah, the emir, had expected to be able to negotiate some kind of neutralizing arrangement with the Russians despite having declared war, as part of his policy to try to hold the balance between the two powers; Samsonov’s deployments forced his hand, and the BEF, waiting on the southern frontier, was called in. At Kholm on June 24, the Russians got their first taste of British marksmanship by running into Sir Douglas Haig’s I Corps and were forced to fall back in disarray; Haig immediately pressed French for the authorization to follow up the victory with an attack up the railroad to Bukhara.

It was in China that the Russians received the greatest humiliation of all, though. The rapid Japanese advance in May and June 1915 took almost everybody by surprise. Ruzsky had failed to halt the Japanese at the Yalu, so in the second week of May he organized a counteroffensive motivated not by his military instincts but by his desire to save his job. The Russians attacked the Japanese at the border port of Andong and soon saw for themselves just how much the Japanese had taken the lessons of the Manchurian war to heart. Oku still relied on the value of advanced infantry assault tactics, but unlike in 1905 the Japanese knew the power of the defensive. After three days of hard fighting the Russians were sent reeling back towards Mukden and the Japanese renewed their advance afresh, overrunning several isolated Russian units in the process. Another attempt to stand and fight, at Benxi at the end of the month, went about as well for the Russians, and by the end of June Oku’s troops were besieging Mukden and Port Arthur while Ruzsky’s battered armies fell back further north along the Trans-Siberian Railway to recuperate.

Ruzsky and his defenders quickly leveled complaints at the Germans for not supporting them. Indeed, Germany had an Asiatic squadron stronger than the Russian one, although still far from being able to match Japan. United, Graf Spee’s East Asiatic Squadron and the Russians at Port Arthur might, just might have been able to interfere with the Japanese troop transports to Korea. Spee himself, however, discounted this possibility. Spee preferred the precepts of cruiser warfare, as propounded by Curt von Maltzahn, and his resources were well suited to the task. He had over five million marks at his disposal to buy coal and supplies while at sea, and through Germany’s global wireless network he could coordinate with Berlin. For Maltzahn and Spee, cruiser warfare – attacking British commerce – was not an end in itself; both recognized that the British volume of trade in the Pacific was too low to effectively attack. Instead, Spee’s cruisers would be a means to an end: drawing the British fleet, by driblets, out of home waters so the High Seas Fleet could steam out and crush the remainder.

The United Kingdom was uniquely poorly suited to the task of fighting a global naval war, despite its preponderance in numbers. Rather like Russia, in absolute terms it had the combat resources to overwhelm any single enemy, but in logistical terms, the Admiralty could not hope to coordinate such a fleet. Admiral Sir John Fisher, the apostle of the Dreadnought and the most polarizing single figure in British naval policy before the war, may very well have been, as his defenders claim, a force for modernization and innovation in the Royal Navy. But he was also a man who nonsensically forbade the institution of naval war planning, real naval gunnery exercises, several individual technical improvements to naval gun platforms, and a real naval staff. Britain was thus exceptionally vulnerable to the exact kind of plan Spee proposed. In theory, his seven cruisers could be swamped by a convergence of the Australian and New Zealand fleets, the Imperial Japanese Navy, and the British Far Eastern flotilla. But in practice, those groups could only operate well together if they were fighting alongside each other. The Japanese were preoccupied with security for their transports in Korea and south China, while the British were loathe to leave the Indian Ocean uncovered, and confused by the Admiralty’s attempts to manage from across the globe.

It was not until July that the British finally figured out Spee’s course: towards South America, potentially to break out towards the Atlantic. Australia’s new battlecruiser, aptly named HMAS Australia, attacked the German wireless stations in their Pacific colonies to cut Spee off from Berlin, but this was arguably a blessing: he was no longer forced to deal with ineffective attempts to command from afar, unlike the British, and moreover, with no one to talk to, Spee’s squadron maintained radio silence, thus blinding the British to his movements. In August, alerted by American newspapers of Australia’s presence at Samoa, Spee steamed for Apia to try to overwhelm and sink her, lucked out, and managed to catch her unawares, destroying Australia after a several-hour fight. The Apia battle panicked the Admiralty, but Spee adroitly confused the British and Japanese into thinking he was headed for the Marianas while in fact doubling back for French Polynesia and the Chilean coast. By October, the British finally figured out what was up, and dispatched the Western Atlantic Squadron to sink Spee’s cruisers – but the British commander, Admiral Sir Christopher Cradock, made a series of tactical errors that permitted Spee to wipe out the majority of the British squadron off Valparaiso, forcing the remaining vessel, a modern armored cruiser the equal of any single one of Spee’s ships, to flee for the Atlantic.

The fact that Spee was never joined by the Russians at Port Arthur – with whom he could have annihilated virtually any opponent, and even remained in the Pacific for some time – remains a testament to the looseness of the ties of the Three Emperors’ League before the war. But the use that the Germans made of Spee’s cruise was a combination of sound strategy and sheer dumb luck. Churchill and Fisher in London, although their personalities clashed on most issues, were unified in the necessity to dispatch ships to crush Spee, who was then cruising for the Río de la Plata to disrupt trade there. The means by which they did so remain controversial to this day, especially since by doing so the British played right into Spee’s hands: three battle cruisers and several older armored cruisers sailed south under the command of Admiral Sir F. C. D. Sturdee. This weakened the precious Grand Fleet, and gave the High Seas Fleet a decent shot at numerical parity if it were to attack.

Britain’s Grand Fleet, commanded since October 1914 by Admiral Sir John Jellicoe, commanded the North Sea at the outbreak of war. Britain’s naval strategy had gone through twists and turns for several years, but was eventually fixed on a premise with which few – excepting out-of-touch admirals like Sir Arthur Wilson, or enthusiastic daredevils (read: lunatics) like Churchill – disagreed: distant blockade. Despite all of the ink spilled and arguments had in previous years over the other options available to Britain’s fleet – an amphibious landing in the Baltic (rejected by the army in 1909) and a close blockade of the German coast, aided by an attack on Helgoland (rejected by the navy in 1911) – distant blockade, with the Grand Fleet sitting at anchor at Scapa Flow in the Orkneys, played to Britain’s strengths. It forced the Germans to attack with numerical inferiority and ensured eventual victory through economic starvation. And all the while, even by not moving, the British fleet ensured command of the sea by virtue of its maritime preponderance. Jellicoe’s temperament was perfect for this strategy: bookish, intellectual, and analytical, he was far from the risk-taking Nelsonic ideal that Fisher and Churchill had in mind for a battle admiral.

Germany, on the other hand, was conferred with several disadvantages. Its High Seas Fleet was numerically inferior, and the pace of naval construction did not seem likely to change that anytime soon. Germany was also stuck, with only two exits from the North Sea, one of which was highly impractical and the other of which was the Grand Fleet’s very lair. The High Seas Fleet, as the naval strategists Friedrich von Baudissin and Wolfgang Wegener recognized, was the prisoner of Britain’s geography. And the defensive advantages that the High Seas Fleet enjoyed – difficult tides in the Jade and Ems estuaries where it moored, Helgoland as an advanced outpost against the British, and a numerical superiority in destroyers well-suited to coastal warfare – were just the ones that warned the British off from an aggressive naval campaign, and which furthermore made taking the offensive logistically difficult. To cap it all off, the Kaiser himself made clear that high casualties for his prized fleet would be unacceptable, and tried to place limits on the authority of his naval commanders to take risks. How he expected to obtain reward without risk remained unclear.

At the outbreak of war, therefore, the advocates of the offensive, like Baudissin and Friedrich von Ingenohl, the commander of the High Seas Fleet, were silenced by the Kaiser and the chief of the naval planning staff, Hugo von Pohl, who argued that risking the fleet in a useless and risky action was pointless, with the army attaining such dramatic victories in Lorraine. A British destroyer and cruiser raid on the Helgoland Bight in May, which severely damaged one German cruiser and sank two light cruisers, failed to convince the Kaiser of the merits of committing the fleet to battle. What it did convince him, and Pohl, of, was the need to find a proper use for Germany’s U-boats. Britain had led the development of the submarine early on, and still had the largest number of underwater vessels, but the Germans’ were more advanced and were being built at a faster rate (despite Fisher’s strident advocacy of the submarine, which he considered to be more valuable than battleships). The German naval staff had expected their U-boats to play a critical role in the defense of the Helgoland Bight, but they were nowhere to be found during the May raid. Ingenohl successfully argued that they needed to be dispersed and sent out to the North Sea to prey on the British blockading vessels and the Grand Fleet. Combined with the use of merchantmen converted to use as minelayers, the U-boats were expected to be the attritional force that they had failed to be in the Helgoland Bight.

The German strategy succeeded beyond Ingenohl’s wildest dreams. For three months, from June through August 1915, the U-boat/minelayer strategy gave the Germans control of the North Sea. Although early on, the Germans still had to try to work out the kinks in their vessels – several mechanical defects were exposed during the first weeks of June – by the end of August, U-boats had sunk some five cruisers and convinced Jellicoe to temporarily move the Grand Fleet to Ireland, whereupon it ran into mine trouble, leaving three vessels, including the brand-new superdreadnought HMS Queen Elizabeth, at the bottom of the sea. Jellicoe quickly took steps to limit the damage, and at any rate the Germans were running low on their stocks of torpedoes, but the attritional damage was done, and the gap between the Grand Fleet and High Seas Fleet continued to close.

Ingenohl continued to argue that the Germans needed to take the offensive by the very nature of the war, but failed to gain a receptive audience until word arrived in Berlin of the dispatch of Sturdee’s squadron to the South Atlantic in October. Persuaded that this would give the Germans something close enough to parity to potentially be decisive, the Kaiser green-lit a raid on the English coast, to be conducted by Franz von Hipper’s battlecruiser squadron; the British failed to respond in time, and Hipper got away neatly after blowing up several portside facilities near Yarmouth. Buoyed by the success of the Yarmouth raid, the Kaiser gave the go-ahead to sally with the entire High Seas Fleet two nights later, when the tides were right, but limited Ingenohl by prohibiting him from engaging the entire Grand Fleet.

Fisher’s failure to implement a proper naval staff once again impeded the Royal Navy in mounting an effective response. British decryption, run by the office at ‘Room 40’, was top-notch, and the Germans’ predilection for transmitting wireless messages even between neighboring ships meant that they had ample sample material with which to work. Consequently, the Admiralty knew that at least part of the High Seas Fleet had set sail – or, at least, some of the admirals did, but the word failed to get out properly. Confusion limited the reaction force to a single battle squadron, Admiral Sir George Warrender’s Second, and two cruiser squadrons, one of which was Admiral Sir David Beatty’s depleted battlecruiser squadron. Yet luck seemingly smiled on the British. As the High Seas Fleet approached Lowestoft in the dark in the early morning of October 17, Ingenohl’s spotters found Warrender’s destroyers and assumed they belonged to the whole Grand Fleet. Ingenohl, constrained by his orders, gave the word for the High Seas Fleet to turn for the German coast, forfeiting the very chance he had hoped for.

Hipper’s battlecruisers had been farther out, and had attacked traffic on the Wash and at Kingston-upon-Hull. By first light, they had turned around and were near a gap in the minefields at the Outer Dowsing when Beatty, poorly informed by the destroyer escorts, barreled into them. After initial contact, Hipper, sighting Warrender’s Dreadnoughts, broke off, but Beatty’s blood was up and he ordered a pursuit. The British reliance on flag signaling and the lack of signals to cover Beatty’s specific orders meant that HMS Tiger, one of his battlecruisers, headed the wrong way in the early morning fog, leaving the British with two cruisers to Hipper’s four. The result was a vicious savaging: Beatty’s flagship, HMS Lion, was circled by three German cruisers, which poured metal into her until she went down, with Beatty himself among the casualties. HMS Princess Royal, Beatty’s other vessel, managed to effect her escape and rejoin Tiger under the overall command of Admiral Archibald Moore.

At that point, though, Moore’s battlecruisers were joined by Warrender’s Dreadnoughts, arriving late on the scene. Vastly outgunned, Hipper attempted to pull away, with all of his battlecruisers sustaining heavy damage. It appeared as though the Germans were boxed in, but a false submarine sighting convinced Warrender to turn away, and when he finally managed to get his ships back on track the limitations of the signal book intervened again, confusing most of his vessels into attacking an isolated German cruiser attached to Hipper’s squadron. With the SMS Magdeburg acting as sacrificial lamb, Hipper managed to bring the rest of his battered squadron out of range and successfully made for the safety of the German coast.

Fisher’s obstinacy inflicted perhaps the unkindest cut of all after the Battle of the Outer Dowsing: without a naval staff, the British learned precisely the wrong lessons from the battle. Moore and Warrender were blamed for not having supported Beatty closely enough; failure to concentrate was held up as the main error. The British never knew that the entire High Seas Fleet had been at sea, and thus never realized the near disaster that had overtaken Warrender’s squadron. Furthermore, technical defects in Fisher’s battlecruiser designs, which made them extremely vulnerable to German gunnery, were not noticed. Instead, Moore focused on the relatively small caliber of many of the German guns, and noted that the British vessels could just shrug them off: Lion had died not from inferior armament but from overwhelming firepower. To an extent this was true (at least of Hipper’s battlecruisers) but it obscured the improvements the British themselves needed to make. Besides, British shells had shown their own inadequacy against the heavier German armor. Only after sustained fire from an entire Dreadnought squadron and several battlecruisers did even the aging Magdeburg give up the ghost. Many of these judgments were falsely confirmed after Sturdee’s squadron overwhelmed Spee near the mouth of the Río de la Plata on November 3, sustaining significant damage (and losing one cruiser) in the process; concentration and numbers, it seemed, were key. Nothing was done about the fleet-construction defects or the shell problems, nor about the signal book that impeded communication – much less about the need for a planning staff to coordinate it all.

Postwar British observers were struck by the way the Germans responded to the fight in the Outer Dowsing. During the winter of 1914-5 the High Seas Fleet stayed in drydock, with the Germans focusing on improvements to armor and on the introduction of heavier guns. Hipper also highlighted the weakness of German fire-control arrangements, noting that it took entirely too long for even the badly outnumbered Lion to be destroyed. And all of the improvements were systematic, nearly fleet-wide, unlike in Britain, where even when modifications were made (and they were mostly not), they were only applied to individual vessels. Even with the remaining doctrinal disagreements between Pohl and Ingenohl – disagreements which were rapidly decreasing as the war went on – the German naval staff organization proved its worth at coordinating the war effort on the high seas…at least, the German war effort.

The Kaiser was increasingly turning his attention to the high seas because it was clear that no quick decision would eventuate on land. Mackensen’s conscious determination to focus on the rest of the world – with all of the long-term planning that entailed – meant that Western Front offensive operations were left for later, handing Joffre the initiative once again for the remainder of 1915. Aside from the constant low-level pressure necessary to keep the Germans honest and a few more major actions (‘more major’ having the meaning of ‘entailing casualties in excess of 25,000’) towards fall near Belfort, though, Joffre conserved his manpower, wary of the backlash that came after the hemorrhage of late spring and anxious to gain the support of the steadily-mobilizing British Army.

On Russia’s periphery, operations remained limited by logistics. The initial failures on the Caucasus front were more the result of panic than any real threat, but it was too late to do much of anything about them now. The tsar instead contented himself by getting rid of Myshlayevsky and organizing a Caucasus Front independent of the viceroy, with Pavel von Plehve in command and Yudenich heading up the staff. With rapidly growing manpower after August, the Caucasus Front managed to easily parry Enver’s stumbling thrusts at Kars. A counteroffensive was ruled out, however, by the need to divert resources to Iran, where several British corps, rapidly becoming available due to a frenzy of recruitment at home, had joined the Constitutionalists and an Ottoman army under Ahmed Izzet Paşa in launching a general offensive around the shores of Lake Urmia to try to capture Tabriz. The Russians, aided by the worsening weather, managed to successfully grind out the defense and force the Entente powers to halt in early November. Still, Russia’s position in northern Iran was increasingly tenuous, and Stavka, the Russian central command authority (headed up by velikiy knyaz Nikolai Nikolaievich), prioritized Azerbaijan ahead of everything other than Manchuria for the coming year.

Haig’s planned offensive towards Bukhara had petered out for reasons mostly beyond his control: he couldn’t really even launch it. Habibullah, anxious to retain his leverage over the British, limited the BEF’s size to its original two corps, claiming (spuriously) that Afghanistan lacked the resources to support more than that and that he could not be held responsible for the behavior of his tribesmen were the British presence to become more prevalent. Haig was therefore forced to seethe with his troops in defensive positions while the Russians went on their merry way, offloading troops in Bukhara, and finally launching their own offensive in October. It too stalled, albeit at a high cost in casualties for both sides that further irritated relations between Habibullah and the British.

Finally, fighting obviously intensified in China. The outbreak of war had seen Falkenhayn’s Chinese expeditionary force working up in Shandong, leaving it amply prepared for the Anglo-Japanese invasion that came out of Weihaiwei, upon which the Japanese were driven back with heavy casualties, but those exertions left the Beiyang Army unsupported, and it was on it that the hammerblow fell. Jiang, launching the opening stages of a Napoleonic plan to destroy the Qing and seize control of the Republican government, had planned a vast offensive utilizing large numbers of conscripts organized around Japanese cadres. His primary target was, once again, Zhengzhou, one of the largest and most important Qing bases and the center of several critical rail junctions. But Jiang’s plan was Marlboroughnic in conception: he expected to take Zhengzhou, but even if he failed, the effort would draw the attenuated Qing armies thither, and then he could follow it up by exploiting weakness elsewhere – Chengdu, to cover his western flank, and Jiangsu, to cover Nanjing and potentially link up with the Shandong invasion force. His timing was excellent – striking before the Russians managed to redeploy sufficient forces to hold down Manchuria and reinforce the Qing – and his attacks succeeded perfectly, with both Zhengzhou and Luoyang falling into Republican hands, Qing forces driven back on the Jiangsu coastline, and the Beiyang armies in Chengdu trapped in an urban battle of attrition that they lacked the manpower to win.

The startling success of Jiang’s Spring Offensive drove the Qing back on the Huanghe and the Qinling Mountains, and kick-started a dangerous coup against Yuan in Beijing (which he successfully put down with the aid of newly arrived German troops). It also spawned opponents, both foreign and domestic. Mackensen, with the news of the fall of Zhengzhou coming not long after the failure at the Grand Couronné, decided that China should be moved up to a top priority, and many of the reservists being mobilized were sent east along the Trans-Siberian Railway to augment Falkenhayn’s army. It also spawned enemies within the Republic, for Sun Yat-sen belatedly realized Jiang’s threat to his rule. Worried about a military coup, he made moves to solidify his political support. On one level, he made the flashy move of marrying into the famous Song family, which made him the brother-in-law of Kong Xiangxi, the richest man in China and a key backer for the war effort. (His wife, Song Qingling, also had impeccable credentials with the Left, securing his ideological position as well.) On another, Sun announced the dissolution of his tottering national-unity government in Nanjing in August, forming a new political party, the Guomindang, or Nationalist Party, incorporating elements of the old Tongmenghui and backed with the formidable support of the popular Song Jiaoren, to better organize opposition to Jiang. In the midst of these political squabbles which began to consume Jiang’s attention after the summer of 1915, it was inevitable that military efficiency would suffer, and with the influx of fresh Russo-German troops the Republican armies were driven back from the Qinling Mountains, reopening the supply lines to the troops holding out in Chengdu.

Oku made good on his excellent position at the opening of summer 1915 and successfully captured Mukden, along with nearly a hundred thousand Russian soldiers and Ruzsky himself, on July 5. Port Arthur continued to hold out in his rear, however, and the Russians were massing ever more troops in the Hinggan ranges to the north. After halfheartedly attempting a rush down the railroad towards Kuancheng, where the remnants of the Manchurian Front were coalescing under the command of a new leader, Aleksei Brusilov, Oku settled down to establish strong defensive positions, launch irritating cavalry raids, and solidify control of Liaoning. Brusilov, anxious to reestablish control over the critical rail link, began probing attacks in August, but didn’t really commit large numbers of troops to the Mukden operation until September, trying to turn the worsening weather into an advantage. Aided by his attached Cossacks, which seriously threatened Oku’s lines of communication, Brusilov’s troops stepped off on September 20 and soon found themselves in a race to try to prevent Oku’s outnumbered defenders from withdrawing out of the noose Brusilov had so painstakingly constructed. Oku had been preparing to make a fight of things, but received orders from Hasegawa Yoshimichi, the chief of the imperial general staff, to preserve his army, and had already begun making preparations to fight his way out. Ultimately, the Japanese managed to pull back to strong defensive positions forty miles from the Yalu, escaping Brusilov’s planned encirclement, but the breathtaking gains of the spring and summer had been erased, and the Japanese were in for a longer, grinding campaign of attrition.

There was but one theater left: Germany’s African colonies. The defense of these was entrusted to the colonial office, not to the general staff, and so policy revolved around maintaining the colony as a European colony – and ideally a German one, to be used in the peace negotiations – by retaining possession for the entire war. This clashed rather dramatically with the general staff’s inclination to seek battle and annihilate the enemy’s forces. Thus it was that German Togoland was surrendered within a week of the outbreak of war to the forces of the British Gold Coast Regiment. The Cape colony took considerably longer to do much of anything. To Asquith’s terror, Boer representatives threatened civil war in the Cape if they were forced to fight the Germans, and a few isolated units actually made good on that threat, which tied down British forces there for some months. Eventually, Asquith shocked everybody by proposing an old pet project of Campbell-Bannerman’s, a South African dominion to be effectively dominated by an Anglo-Boer partnership. The Tories – who had rather abruptly ceased their harping over Ireland after the outbreak of war – were pushed into hysterical histrionics about the betrayal of British sons who died in the Boer War and so on and so forth, further weakening the Asquith government (more on that later), but ultimately failing to hold Asquith’s South Africa bill up. By the time the whole situation could be resolved it was already November, far too late to think about attacking German South-West Africa. Further north, Kamerun and East Africa, Germany’s other colonies, had been hardly touched (save for a few outposts seized by the French on the Kamerun border areas) by virtue of the British and French having concentrated far more on other theaters with their disposable manpower. It took time to bring Indian, West African, and now South African forces to bear, and by the winter that had not fully been done.
 
Austria-Hungary was alone among the Great Powers involved in the war in doing basically nothing. The K.u.K. navy remained in base at Pola, joined soon enough by Germany’s Mediterranean squadron. France’s Mediterranean fleet established a barrage across the Adriatic entrances but did little else, unwilling to test the Austrians’ firepower in the restricted Adriatic waters. Austria’s army remained unmobilized, waiting in readiness; the head of the Austrian general staff, Franz Conrad von Hötzendorf, believed that Italy was the Dual Monarchy’s greatest foe, and persuaded Franz Josef to only send token forces to shore up the Germans on the Western Front.

If an overall verdict were given on the outcome of the 1915 campaigns it would have to be ‘indecisive’, of course. While the Entente made major gains in most areas, in all of them the gains were both bloody and disappointingly below prewar estimates. Even the belief that Germany would collapse from financial exhaustion and from the destruction of its overseas trade proved unfounded. Qing China had proved more resilient than had been hoped. And the German imperial navy had been an incorrigible opponent; though Spee’s squadron was at the bottom of the Río de la Plata, it had done unacceptable amounts of damage on its way there, and the High Seas Fleet was even worse.

With the current plans for the destruction of Germany – for Germany, the leaders of the Entente knew, was the linchpin of the Three Emperors’ League – proving insufficient, the British and French began to plan a new operation in the late fall of 1915. Joffre had long entertained the idea of violating Belgian neutrality to outflank the German fortifications in Alsace-Lorraine, and part of the reason French activity had been relatively sparse after the summer had been Joffre’s effort to build up a reserve for such a purpose. But members of the British cabinet, especially Churchill, came on board by November. Churchill had personally scouted the idea of seizing Antwerp to operate on the flanks of a German army passing through Belgium, and was disappointed when those plans had never been put into practice. Now, he was getting the chance to reactivate them, and even expand them.

For it would not be enough to invade only Belgium, Joffre knew. The Belgians controlled the narrow passage between Luxembourg (which would also be a target) and the Dutch ‘Maastricht appendix’, and had blocked it with the great and modern fortification of Liège; backed by Germans, Liège could probably hold for years, and would erase the whole point of the march around the Germans’ flanks. The Netherlands – or at least its Maastricht appendix – had to be occupied as well, to allow the Entente to send troops into the north German plain, from where they could seize the North Sea ports, or the Ruhr, even perhaps Berlin itself…Joffre knew the right buttons to push to convince Churchill of the plan’s utility, and won an immediate convert after meeting personally at Grand Quartier Général (GQG, the French supreme command post) in Vitry-le-François in November. Onto this plan, Churchill tacked his old enthusiasm for an invasion of the Helgoland Bight, to capture Helgoland and Borkum and destroy the High Seas Fleet once and for all, since apparently Jellicoe was incapable of getting the job done. An even more ambitious plan, authored by Fisher, proposed landing the British troops in the Baltic, from where they could march to Berlin and end the war in a trice, but the army’s opposition and Churchill’s fear of the Russian Baltic Fleet scuttled it.

The Germans, of course, had an inkling that this would happen. Churchill’s enthusiasm for his Borkum Plan was well known (and had contributed to a naval scare or two in the prewar years). And the violation of Belgian neutrality had been foretold years before, by no less than Schlieffen, who argued that if the Germans did not invade Belgium, the French certainly would. Knowing the location of an attack and preparing to repulse it, however, are two entirely different things. It did not help that the tentative feelers made towards the Belgian and Dutch governments to try to warn them of the invasion fell on deaf ears, with both states – especially Belgium – so committed to their neutrality that it was rated as more important than the sanctity of their soil and the lives of their citizens. (A similar reaction, incidentally, drove Churchill and a few others into wishful thinking. Since it would be so destructive to Belgium and the Netherlands to resist in a hopeless struggle for the sake of their national honor and little else, presumably they would turn the other cheek when the British and French came in seeking passage.)

To aid in planning for this endeavor, Asquith gave up the war ministry portfolio – which he had held since the mutinous stirrings in the Army over Ulster the previous year – and gave it to the charismatic Earl Kitchener, whose iconic recruitment poster remains a cultural landmark to this day. Kitchener’s contribution to the actual organization effort is rather more dubious and debatable, but in the winter of 1915-6, at least, he lit a fire under the various staffs and cranked up the rate of recruitment while gearing Britain for a Continental war. The army had long promised the French that it would intervene on the Continent, although Russian belligerence and the lack of a German advance into Belgium had put that off somewhat. Now Continentalism was back with a vengeance, as British troops stationed in Asia were shipped back home, replaced by Australians, Indians, and New Zealanders. The Grand Fleet was significantly less enthusiastic about fighting the High Seas Fleet in the latter’s home waters, but Jellicoe recognized that proper timing could negate many of the Germans’ defensive advantages, and at any rate the British still – if narrowly – outgunned the Germans.

Of course, there were the requisite voices of caution. Richard Haldane, who had hoped to reclaim the war ministry (but who was seen as too much of a Germanophile for the job), argued that the war wasn’t going that badly, that the blockade would still take its toll on Germany, and that the British didn’t need to waste men, money, and its global reputation on invading neutral countries. His voice was partially discredited, though, not merely because of his Germanophilia – which was real – but because of his role in the Liberal opposition to Asquith. The outbreak of war had been a temporary boon to the Liberals, who successfully conned the Tories into cooperation in the name of national defense; thus Asquith had managed, underhandedly, to get an amending bill through the Commons that kept Tyrone and Fermanagh in ‘southern’ Ireland, although the implementation of Home Rule was to be left until after the war. But many Liberals, including Lloyd George, were aghast at the failure to address the Triple Alliance’s concerns (fortunately for the government, most of its members had enlisted), while others, like Haldane, disagreed with Asquith on the conduct of the war. Elements of the Army – and of course, the Tories themselves – were angry about the brutal crackdowns in Ulster after rioting erupted in the fall of 1915, which only added to discontent over South Africa and the Home Rule Act. And the worst fracture of all came over a most unlikely source, the 1916 war budget, in which Lloyd George doubled the duties on liquors, strong beers, and even sparkling wines, irritating the Conservatives (the traditional spokesmen for the “Drink Interest”), Labour (angry about the implicit assumptions Lloyd George was making about the drinking habits of the working classes), and Redmond’s Irish Nationalists (duh). Effectively, this meant that the 1916 campaigns would be an indirect vote of confidence in Asquith’s leadership. Well might Asquith or Churchill envy Joffre and the French prime minister, Gaston Doumergue, who enjoyed the backing of the union sacrée in the Chamber of Deputies.

Kitchener’s warnings about quality and troop training difficulties – due to which he was permitted to cannibalize the BEF, once it returned from Central Asia, to provide cadres – convinced the Cabinet and Joffre to hold off on the Belgian offensive for several months. So the first engagements of the war of note happened, in fact, in the Caucasus, where Yudenich’s long-awaited counteroffensive against Sarikamiş opened in February under the cover of a snowstorm. Despite unexpected defensive tenacity on the part of the Turks, the Russians managed to push them out of imperial territory and back across the Aras within a few weeks. They stopped there, though, leading to one of the sadder events to take place during the war, the still-shadowy Armenian genocide. Spontaneous violence against Armenians had already erupted in eastern Anatolia during the course of 1915 in supposed retribution for the outbreak of war. In March, fueled by fears of Armenian collaboration with the Russians, Talaat instituted a policy whereby the army removed many of these potential fifth columnists away from the front. Most of them – a figure in excess of one million – were left in the Syrian desert without food or water, or simply shot. The Russians had a few contacts in the Armenian community, but they were sparse, and at any rate had no plans to attack, and so basically just sat there while the Ottomans cleansed eastern Anatolia.

With everything as ready as it could reasonably be expected to be, the British and French ambassadors in Brussels delivered a note to King Albert on April 10, demanding right of passage and supply for their armies. Before April, the Belgians had been relatively uninterested in the whole war; the Catholic press was close to Austria-Hungary out of all the Great Powers, and the Austrians weren’t doing anything. Colonially, the commanders in the Congo were worried about the potential effects of the war on the loyalties of the native population, but were prepared to use their customary repression to make things work. As noted earlier, Albert and his government felt that an honest maintenance of Belgium’s neutrality restricted Belgian policy and thus refused to mobilize on German advice in March when French preparations for invasion became unmistakably clear. It was unlikely that Belgium would have been able to financially sustain such a mobilization anyway. At any rate, on April 12, when the ultimatum ran out and the Entente powers declared war, Belgium’s army was both scattered and unmobilized.

Predictably, Ferdinand Foch’s groupe d’armées made short work of most of the Belgian army, which was not mobilized in time. The fortress of Namur, which guarded the Meuse valley, fell after a few days’ siege, and Antwerp, seized by General Sir James Grierson’s British Second Army, was captured even faster. Albert called for German aid within a day of the outbreak of war, and prudently pulled what forces he did have back to the protection of the fortress of Liège, on the German frontier. Aided by German reinforcements which were beginning to trickle in, the Belgian commander of Liège, Gérard Leman, put up a stout resistance to the initial French probes on April 22-25, forcing a pause while the French sought a way around to the south, through the Ardennes and Luxembourg.

Foch was aided in this by the British, who quickly advanced from Antwerp across northern Belgium to the Maastricht appendix. The failure of the Heemskerk government in the Netherlands to respond to the British violation of Dutch neutrality – they had had to go through Dutch waters to get to Antwerp – had touched off a political crisis in the Netherlands, and the British took full advantage by crossing the Maastricht appendix without fighting on April 21. Although Grierson’s troops were pushed back from Aachen – thus ensuring the safety of Liège at least for a little while longer – British cavalry broke out and raided as far as München-Gladbach before OHL could redeploy troops to deal with the new threat. Fortunately for the Germans, the British and French had been expected for some months; unfortunately, ‘how’ and ‘where’ were unclear enough that Mackensen had not got troops close enough to the initial scenes of fighting. The result was the Second Army had only to deal with a shell of Landwehr until April 25, and after that was opposed only by equal numbers, fighting the German Tenth Army that had been slated for China.

With the odds beginning to mount against them as the Germans began to redeploy reserves via rail, the British launched a second attack on München-Gladbach in the first week of May and managed to capture the city and cross the canals to Krefeld. At the same time, Foch’s armies, reinforced by fresh troops, pushed through German and Belgian positions in the Ardennes at Malmünd and crossed into German territory there, nearly severing Liège’s supply lines once again. Confronted by the panicky Kaiser at OHL in Koblenz, Mackensen creditably remained calm. Joffre had ordered fixing attacks in Lorraine to prevent the Germans from withdrawing troops from that front and bringing them north, but the Germans were holding there easily without using their reserves. These reserves, amalgamated into an Eleventh Army commanded by Albrecht, the duke of Württemberg, slammed into the southern flank of the British salient in the Rhineland in the third week of May, driving them away from advanced positions near Jülich and threatening to cut off the entire Second Army. While the momentum of the Germans’ attack was unsustainable, the threat to his rear checked Grierson’s latest attack on Krefeld and forced him to reorganize his troops, all the while calling for his expected reinforcements.

Britain relied on command of the sea to send those reinforcements to the Continent, and to ensure that they had it, Churchill had ordered Jellicoe to launch the Borkum Plan on April 16. The Grand Fleet was to support an amphibious assault on Helgoland and then the resort island of Borkum to control the High Seas Fleet’s exits to the North Sea and seal it in port for good, while providing a base from which the Grand Fleet could crush the Germans if they tried to stop it. It was, of course, an exceedingly cunning plan, and it almost worked, too. The substance of the plan was fairly simple. Relying on the fact that the High Seas Fleet needed two high tides to put to sea because of the conditions around the Jade and Ems estuaries, the Grand Fleet would cover the amphibious operations at both islands and, if any of the High Seas Fleet came out, it could be engaged piecemeal, negating the attrition that the Grand Fleet had suffered over the past year.

The Borkum Plan ran into its first problem when it became apparent that the German defenses on Helgoland and Borkum were significantly stronger than they had been before the war, when British officers had scouted the islands disguised as tourists. This was mostly the fault of the Battle of Helgoland Bight the previous year, when Beatty’s raid had so discomfited the Germans; they had spent significant time and money improving coastal defenses, convinced that the British would be following up on their raid at any moment. These included mines, of which Jellicoe was extremely worried after the sinking of the Queen Elizabeth the previous year off Lough Swilly, which further constricted his options for maneuver. Archibald Paris’ Royal Marines hit the beach (as it were) at both places on the morning of April 17 and were placed under a withering fire from the start. Several battleships had to be drawn off to provide extra fire support, blanketing the island and providing succor to the marines but weakening the Grand Fleet’s potential response force against a German sally. What was worse, the Germans had been forewarned of the British arrival by shore-based aircraft, and had managed to scramble several cruiser squadrons and two battle squadrons before the Grand Fleet even got there, leaving the British with no time to engage the High Seas Fleet piecemeal. The British also had to deal with Germany’s swarms of destroyers – which, even if the Grand Fleet hadn’t been so far from its Scapa base, would have outnumbered those of the British – and U-boats, which maintained a constant harassment.

When Ingenohl finally managed to get the entire High Seas Fleet out of harbor, he sailed into the first Dreadnought-on-Dreadnought clash in history. The British were disorganized, both from the efforts of covering the invasions of Helgoland and Borkum and from the utterly inadequate flag signaling that was supposed to serve as an effective mouthpiece for Jellicoe’s orders. The loss of Beatty along with one of his precious battlecruisers also proved to be a serious problem; his replacement, Vice-Admiral William Pakenham, was capable, but new and somewhat untested in his command, having commanded the cruiser squadron sent south to fight Spee the previous winter. Hipper promptly took advantage of the situation by coordinating a torpedo attack that drove one of Pakenham’s squadrons onto the German Dreadnoughts’ guns – but the torpedoes themselves, along with Hipper’s own fire, sank three of the British battlecruisers and crippled a fourth.

Belatedly recognizing the threat, Jellicoe managed to concentrate his Dreadnoughts and assemble in a semblance of line of battle. In the fairly confused melee that followed, the improvements that the Germans had made to their ships over the previous winter told dramatically. Although British gunnery was more effective than the Germans’, the Germans could shrug off many of the hits and near-hits. Fisher’s watchwords had been speed and firepower, but the necessary trade-off was armor thickness, and poor British policies about ammunition storage and gun maintenance contributed even more to making the Dreadnoughts virtual tinderboxes. HMS Orion, the first of the so-called superdreadnoughts, took eleven hits and finally blew up only half a mile away from Jellicoe’s flagship, HMS Iron Duke. Further down the line, HMS Audacious broke in half after sustaining hits from three different German Dreadnoughts. After three hours of battering away, Jellicoe successfully managed to extricate the Grand Fleet by ordering Pakenham’s remaining battlecruisers to suicidally charge the Germans – the so-called “Death Ride” subsequently immortalized in British naval legend. Surprisingly, despite being targeted by the entire High Seas Fleet, only one battlecruiser, HMS New Zealand, was sunk, while Pakenham’s four remaining vessels successfully broke free. Having sustained not-inconsiderable losses to his own fleet, Ingenohl elected not to pursue.

The losses to both sides were severe. Ingenohl’s High Seas Fleet lost two predreadnoughts in the prolonged melee with the Grand Fleet’s battle line, and sustained significant damage to most ships in the battle squadrons. In addition, Hipper had lost a battlecruiser – SMS Moltke – and the British had also sunk five light cruisers. Destroyer and U-boat losses were higher due not just to the covering role they had played while the High Seas Fleet got into position but also to fratricide from U-boat torpedoes. But the British had clearly been worse off. Two Dreadnoughts had been lost, along with a shocking five battlecruisers and nine light and armored cruisers. Damage to the rest of the Grand Fleet was so high that Jellicoe estimated that the entire fleet was unlikely to be able to take to sea for at least a year afterward. And the British had lost even more than that in terms of trained personnel: without the ability to conscript naval servicemen as the Germans did, the Royal Navy had gone into the war with a much smaller body of war-ready sailors. The British lost even more trained men when the marines on Helgoland, bereft of naval support and an exit, were forced to surrender three days after the battle, having managed to maintain their position on the island for a remarkably long time given the circumstances. The marines on Borkum had tried to break out to the Netherlands; about half of them made it, and were interned for the rest of the war.

With the Grand Fleet crippled, Ingenohl and Pohl urged the resumption of submarine operations. Beginning in May 1916, U-boats once again began to sally, targeting British cross-Channel transports. Although the destroyers of the British Harwich Force were able to interfere with their operations, the Germans still made shipping to Antwerp a nightmare and impeded the delivery of troops and supplies to bolster Grierson’s army in western Germany. Thus, although British troops made it to the Rhine, by early June they were increasingly unable to hold their positions in the face of growing German manpower. Foch’s efforts to outflank Liège stalled as well, with the Germans and Belgians making excellent use of the rough Ardennes terrain in holding off the French. When Grierson died of heart trouble on June 9, with British troops still on the offensive in the ruins of Krefeld, the campaign lost one of its strongest remaining advocates, and Henry Wilson, his chief of staff, took over and began to withdraw towards Maastricht, successfully parrying a fresh attempt by the duke of Württemberg to cut the British off in the process.

By mid-June, it was clear that heads would roll. Asquith had already dumped Churchill in May, taking over the naval portfolio himself while employing Fisher to run the day-to-day operations of the fleet. More rats fled the sinking ship as Haldane brought several Liberal MPs into talks with Bonar Law on May 15. But it was not until June 11, with the clear failure of the Maastricht campaign, that a threat of a no-confidence vote brought Asquith to resign. Yet none of his opponents could muster the support to replace him. The Tories would need to combine with the Irish, which was beyond the impossible, or Labour, which was nearly so. Haldane lacked the support to claim the premiership for himself in a national unity government, and at any rate Bonar Law was still demanding concessions on Ireland that Haldane would have felt incapable of granting. So David Lloyd George, the Welsh Wizard, succeeded Asquith as PM almost by default, successfully bringing Haldane back (he was even made First Lord of the Admiralty, a post for which he was not particularly well suited, as a sop to the anti-Asquith branch of the Liberals). He had Second Army – now commanded by Haig – pull out of the Netherlands entirely, and did his damnedest to try and convince the new Dutch government of Pieter Cort van der Linden to let bygones be bygones (at which Grey, still Foreign Secretary, was mostly successful).

With Liège continuing to stand tall, and German troops massing in the Ardennes for a counteroffensive to clear the fortress’s southern flank, Foch too was forced to give up on his invasion for the time being. The French, however, had much more freedom of action, both politically and militarily, than did the British. In addition, Second Army remained on the Continent, with Kitchener successfully fending off calls to withdraw it (Haldane in particular arguing that “Continentalism has failed” and that the empire was what needed protection). In August, Joffre and Foch used the British as the spearhead for a fresh offensive in Luxembourg, where Joffre judged the German lines to be weaker than anywhere else. He was right, but not right enough, as the Anglo-French attackers were repelled by large numbers of German heavy guns that were shipped to the scene – part and parcel of Mackensen and Falkenhayn’s new strategy of spending matériel instead of manpower to avoid the heavy casualties of 1915. However, the Germans did lose a significant amount of ground in a coterminous Woëvre offensive east of Verdun.

In China, 1916 was the year of the Brusilov offensive, based on evolving operational assault techniques that Falkenhayn and Brusilov had cooked up in meetings in Beijing. The Russians eschewed mass attacks, which were deemed to be too costly (normally not a Russian concern, but considering the immense difficulty in getting manpower to the front in China, troops were increasingly at a premium), in favor of smaller-scale limited offensives that didn’t overextend outside of artillery cover. With a series of these bite-sized attacks all along the front, Brusilov eroded the Japanese lines by as much as twenty miles over the course of the summer. Eventually, the Japanese hit on the ammunition-intensive tactic of maintaining artillery fire at almost all times, preventing any Russians, anywhere from moving at all. Although this caused a political crisis in Japan in the fall – a “shell shortage” scare that was mirrored in the UK, France, Germany, and Russia – the Japanese did successfully halt Brusilov’s offensive, and the canny Russian returned to the drawing board to try to find yet another workaround.

Falkenhayn himself was severely limited in operational terms: the Low Countries offensives had robbed him of the manpower he had planned to use to push the Republicans back from Zhengzhou. In addition, Entente troop strength in China continued to rise, with ANZACs finally making an appearance after completing the conquest of Germany’s Pacific colonies. While his Germans were tied down defending against an Anglo-ANZAC-Japanese attack in Shandong in the late summer, Jiang reorganized his armies and, seeking to outflank Sun’s political victories with battlefield ones, opened a major offensive in northern Jiangsu, seeking to clear his flank preparatory to a grand crossing of the Huanghe to take Beijing. Unlike the great success of the Spring Offensive, Jiang’s Autumn Offensive ran into serious trouble; with the Beiyang Army now beginning to employ German artillery tactics, with infantry dug into the exceedingly messy canal country, the Republicans had to trade huge numbers of lives for every acre. Slowly, excruciatingly, Jiang’s conscripts managed to pry Duan Qirui’s crack defenders out of Xuzhou after a month and a half of fighting in which the Republicans suffered a horrifying 450,000 casualties; not long afterwards, the Autumn Offensive began to break down. Hoping to make at least some profit from the whole enterprise, Jiang ordered a November attack around Chengdu, trying to give the city a bit of defensive depth and counting on Qing reserves having been drawn elsewhere; it succeeded in most of its objectives, but did not stop the rumbles of discontent from Nanjing.

Considering Russia’s other fronts, 1916 was actually quite a good year. After pushing the Ottomans out of Sarikamiş, Plehve and Yudenich prepared a limited offensive around Lake Urmia to clear the threat to Tehran; with British troops in the area drawn down in order to launch the Antwerp invasion, the Russians managed to drive the Turks and Constitutionalists back and secure favorable defensive positions. In July, the new Iranian Front, under the direction of Mikhail Alekseyev, launched its own offensive, attempting to capture Qum and shore up the Qajars with a badly needed victory. The edges of the great Iranian salt desert were at their worst, and some Russian divisions recorded up to fifty percent casualties from heat exhaustion and dehydration. But Alekseyev, unwittingly, had timed his offensive well, for the Constitutionalists were riven by a political struggle: Rezā Khan, an accomplished former army officer who had defected in 1915 along with the equivalent of two divisions, was attempting to gain the supreme command, and the Bakhtiaris were blocking him from doing so. To prove his value, Rezā Khan withheld his troops from battle at Qum while many Bakhtiaris were killed by the Russian advance, then – as the exhausted Russians tried to push on southward without artillery support – mounted a defense, easily defeated the overextended Russians, and claimed a glorious victory. Nevertheless, Alekseyev had gained a buffer for Tehran and a badly needed victory to bolster the Qajar regime. What might have happened had the Russians not won at Qum was made clear in October, as a British-backed coup nearly wiped out the shah’s council of ministers, while emir Aslan Khan Choiski led an Azeri revolt around Tabriz that was only narrowly crushed.
 
With the oceans now almost completely free of German cruisers and South African political squabbles successfully dealt with, the Indian and South African armies began to deploy vast armies to invade the Germans’ African colonies. First up on the target list was Southwest Africa, for its proximity to South Africa and for its congenial terrain for the Boers’ mobile style of warfare. Jan Smuts, a key figure in Union politics and a veteran of the kommando warfare of the war against the British, led the South African detachment, enjoying both a maneuver advantage from the large numbers of Boer cavalry and a considerable numerical advantage. Windhoek fell on May 18 and the Germans surrendered near Tsumeb two months later. Kamerun and East Africa were much harder nuts to crack; while about as large as Southwest Africa, their terrain was much less congenial, their troop detachments were larger, and their garrisons were led by able military commanders Oskar Zimmermann and Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck. Lettow, a General Staff type, did his utmost to attract attention and tie down British troops, launching raids and even a full-scale attack into British East Africa in early 1916. While he failed in most of his objectives, like encircling the massing Indian Army troops attempting to oppose him, his actions and the incompetence of the local British commanders managed to hold off an invasion of East Africa until 1917. Zimmermann, by contrast, was a Colonial Office type who did his utmost to remain below the radar, only reluctantly fighting with the French when they threatened the subsistence of the Kamerun colony. The major engagement of 1916, on the Ngaundere plateau in October, came about by accident, with the French unintentionally succeeding where they had expended little effort and Zimmermann desperately – and, ultimately, successfully – collecting the troops to push them out.

Elsewhere in Africa, the suspiciously nonbelligerent Italians were finding both success and failure. The Senussi insurgency in Libya was dying down, with the Italians enjoying the dubious honor of being the first state to employ poison gas in warfare during the storming of Derna. But for all that Libya was a “success story”, the Italian campaign in Ethiopia was going past “setback” towards “disaster” on the way to “cautionary tale”. Luigi Capello, the able Italian commander in “support” of Iyasu’s claim to the throne, had managed the campaign well into 1915, successfully capturing both Gonder and Addis Ababa. It was then that the wheels came off. Capello died of pneumonia in the winter of 1915-6, and his replacement, Alberto Cavaciocchi, was not up to par. The Germans, seeing a potential ally for Lettow in East Africa, began to ship Zewditu’s forces equipment and cash to throw out the Italians, and, armed with modern German rifles and even a few mountain guns (expertly smuggled in pieces aboard several U-boats and the cruiser SMS Emden), Zewditu’s loyalists mounted several effective ambushes against the Italians and marched back into Addis Ababa in May 1916. From there, the Italians were forced to fall back onto the Gonder plateau, from which the Ethiopians were unable to dislodge them.

By the winter of 1916-7, it was becoming clear that the Entente’s initial tries at destroying Germany, Russia, and the Qing Empire – the most dangerous members of the alliance – had failed. Somehow, the Germans were beginning to win the naval war, while achieving defensive victories in Western Europe, while the Qing proved more resilient than anybody would have guessed. Russia, impossibly, was actually advancing on all fronts. With the situation anywhere from ‘stalled’ to ‘slowly retreating’ across the major theaters of war, the British and French began to concoct a plan to break the stalemate. If they could not make headway against the strongest of the Three Emperors’ League, they would instead target the weakest…

As for the Germans, their situation, although far from desperate, was not particularly improving. Defensive victories were nice to have in one’s pocket, but everywhere Germany had been prevented from going on the offensive, and Russia’s gains, while heartening, were far too slow to be of use. The British blockade was still in existence, and remained a knife that continued to chop away at Germany’s lifeline, albeit slower than anybody had thought before the war. In search of a fast end to the war – although ostensibly, in meetings with King Albert, for altruistic reasons – Mackensen began to plan a campaign to reconquer Belgium and restore the Bewegungskrieg, the war of movement, that Germany’s officers craved. The officers of the High Seas Fleet began to prepare for an offensive, coordinated with the Russian Baltic Fleet, which would win the North Sea for Germany. And Falkenhayn finally began to gain the troops he needed for his own war-winning campaign.

One way or another, 1917 would be a year of decisive campaigns. The deadlock would not last much longer.

---

Holy detail, Batman! I have problems with self-editing. Anyway, comments and constructive criticism and questions and all that janx are most welcome, requested, and desired.

On a side note, Luckymoose has requested that Russia be recolored in the map to something like a darker green. I don't particularly care what color it is, although I would prefer to not 'change horses in the middle of a TL', as it were, but if there is some sort of general agreement with this then I'd be more than happy to change its color for the good of the cause. The important thing is to convey information in a simple and easily understood manner, after all.
Spoiler World Map 01JAN1917 0000Z :
V4zQT.png
 
I really enjoyed the naval warfare. :goodjob:

But why hasn't Germany made any effort to use its u-boats as they did in OTL WW1?
 
I really enjoyed the naval warfare. :goodjob:

But why hasn't Germany made any effort to use its u-boats as they did in OTL WW1?
Glad you liked the naval detail; I had fun writing it. (Spent the most time on it, too, hahaha.)

Initially, both British and German submarine doctrine stressed the employment of the submarines in close conjunction with fleet units. Both sides believed that the torpedo was a potentially decisive weapon (it was) and figured that the submarine was effectively a more efficient torpedo platform than an S-boot. Unlike OTL, there has not been an anticlimactic lack of North Sea fleet actions in which the U-boats can take part, so nobody is looking for alternative methods by which to employ them. Guerre de course is also not an activity that is suited to the prewar doctrine of any German admirals. Even cruiser warfare as practiced by Spee used commerce-raiding not as an end in itself, but as a means to an end (namely, the end of redressing the balance in the North Sea). Few German cruisers, at the outbreak of war, were interested in trying commerce raiding, and by 1917, only one, the Emden, remains at large.

As the Grand Fleet targets for German submarines begin to dry up (with Jellicoe - or his successor - forced to remain in port), and as the Germans themselves start to think in terms of economic warfare instead of decisive battles, it's probable that somebody will start to suggest using the U-boats in such a manner. We'll see.
 
Second the enjoyment of the naval features. Is the French emphasis on offense a result of butterflies, or a traditional historical misconception? What are the roots of the Iranian Civil War?

EDIT: Also ohjesuswhatishappeninginmexico
 
Back
Top Bottom