American views of the British effort in D-Day and WW2 in general.

useless

Social Justice Rogue
Joined
Dec 4, 2003
Messages
10,378
Location
On the internet
Why is it in films such as Band of brother and Saving private Ryan, that the British are shown to be incompetent or even left out altogether? With the recent events regarding the queen, it seems that America is slowly changing what actually happened: Making it that the British did nothing, whilst America was the one who "Did everything". Why is this happening?
 
They protected the free world from oblivion until we got our act together and into the fight.
 
They protected the free world from oblivion until we got our act together and into the fight.

By that you mean when America was attacked by the Japanese? Not because America viewed what was happening as being wrong? (Not unlike WWI).
 
You're upset that American made WWII movies are American-centric(?)?
 
Look on the bright side: maybe they'll leave you out of any possible movies about the Iraq War as well.
 
You're upset that American made WWII movies are American-centric(?)?

Don't be an idiot, if we were to make a film based upon WW2 and left out your countries contribution or criticised it, you'd no doubt be angry.
 
Why is it in films such as Band of brother and Saving private Ryan, that the British are shown to be incompetent or even left out altogether? With the recent events regarding the queen, it seems that America is slowly changing what actually happened: Making it that the British did nothing, whilst America was the one who "Did everything". Why is this happening?

Hey, Poland's contributions to WW2 are largely ignored. We weren't even invited to the post-war victory celebrations.

Now you almost know how it feels.
 
Why is it in films such as Band of brother and Saving private Ryan, that the British are shown to be incompetent or even left out altogether? With the recent events regarding the queen, it seems that America is slowly changing what actually happened: Making it that the British did nothing, whilst America was the one who "Did everything". Why is this happening?

I laughed when I saw your name under the title. :lol:
 
Don't be an idiot, if we were to make a film based upon WW2 and left out your countries contribution or criticised it, you'd no doubt be angry.

I wasn't trying to be an idiot :confused: I didn't realize that Band of Brothers or Saving Private Ryan criticized the British...:confused: From what I can tell, the films are about the American involvement, so of course they are going to be all about the Americans. The film makers know who their target audience is, so they make a movie to appeal to that demographic, jeesh.

And there are plenty of movies that criticize America. I can't think of any that have to do with WW2, but surely you must be aware that America is criticized all the time.
 
Don't be an idiot, if we were to make a film based upon WW2 and left out your countries contribution or criticised it, you'd no doubt be angry.

No one would care. Well, no one except you.
 
Don't be an idiot, if we were to make a film based upon WW2 and left out your countries contribution or criticised it, you'd no doubt be angry.

In your gripe about not being included, you left out the Canadians.
 
Don't be an idiot, if we were to make a film based upon WW2 and left out your countries contribution or criticised it, you'd no doubt be angry.

Exactly. Nobody minds them patting themselves on the back for things they did do but films where they take the credit for somebody else's achievements are a "bridge too far".:mischief: Like the one about the breaking the Enigma code, for example.
 
In your gripe about not being included, you left out the Canadians.

Okay, i shall revise my views. America also seems to ignore all the other countries contribution towards the war and the eventual victory of the Allies, not just the British. I apologise if i offended anyone by just stating that it was the British, whose contributions were left unrecognised.
 
I have no idea how this myth started, but it is the naive view of many Americans that we singlehandedly won the war. It was actually the Soviet Union who contributed the most if you want to go by the only metric that really makes much sense: The number of military personnel who died.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties

Canada: 45,300
China: 3,800,000
Poland: 240,000
Soviet Union: 10,700,000
UK: 382,700
US: 416,800
Yugoslavia: 446,000

But D-Day is a bad example:

Omaha: 4,500
Utah: 200
Gold: 400
Juno: 340
Sword: 630

Even though you could argue that Omaha Beach was botched and that so many should have never died.
 
I have no idea how this myth started, but it is the naive view of many Americans that we singlehandedly won the war. It was actually the Soviet Union who contributed the most if you want to go by the only metric that really makes much sense: The number of military personnel who died.

Wouldn't it make more sense to go by the metric: the nation who killed the most enemies? I don't know where to get that info though...
 
Why is it in films such as Band of brother and Saving private Ryan, that the British are shown to be incompetent or even left out altogether? With the recent events regarding the queen, it seems that America is slowly changing what actually happened: Making it that the British did nothing, whilst America was the one who "Did everything". Why is this happening?
I don't think Band of Brothers criticized the British. The movie was supposed to be about just this one company. The one time in the series that they dealt with the British in Holland, I don't think there was anything negative about it.
 
Back
Top Bottom