Anti-Maidan

It is? How?



How about we just stop making more COD?

Through the enforcement of homosexual laws. Like the above: people of Ukraine do not want terms "mother" and "father" being eliminated.

If you think Maidanists are for this, you're wrong. Most of them are for some kind of European integration or association, yes. But homosexualization not included. And those UPA militants of Maidan will hang gays on the same street lamps they hang "Jydy" (Jews) and "Moskali" (Muscovites, Russians).

[Citation Needed]

All you do is whining for proofs, while I give tons of them here and you give no citation at all, only empty whining. Oh, I've noticed your nickname now.

Just don't talk directly to me anymore, please.
 
Like the above: people of Ukraine do not want terms "mother" and "father" been eliminated.

They don't use those words in Western Europe any more? That's news to me. I didn't know they had begun establishing the World State as early as Year 106 A.F.
 
Cheezy,

I cannot agree with you regarding the Holodomor. It is not Ukrainian propaganda, there are testimonies of Ukrainian peasants who said how the Soviets were confiscating their food supplies and guarding fields to prevent the collection of remaining crops (most of crops were anyway confiscated by the State). I will try to write more about this later. I saw a documentary in which Ukrainian witnesses (and their children) were talking about their experiences, but I'm not sure if it is available with English subtitles. It is available on You Tube, if I remember correctly. But probably no English subtitles.

Probably the truth is in the middle - to some extent it was natural famine, but to some extent also deliberate policy to eliminate "uncomfortable peasants" (please remember that most of Ukrainian peasants were conservative and religious, many of them were also nationalists or monarchists who wanted the return of Tsars to the throne and the return of old Imperial times - they were not enthusiastic followers of Communism, as some people may think - thus their death was very comfortable for the Soviet government - the fewer Ukrainian peasants, the stronger support for Communism).
 
Cheezy,

I cannot agree with you regarding the Holodomor. It is not Ukrainian propaganda, there are testimonies of Ukrainian peasants who said how the Soviets were confiscating their food supplies and guarding fields to prevent the collection of remaining crops (most of crops were anyway confiscated by the State). I will try to write more about this later. I saw a documentary in which Ukrainian witnesses (and their children) were talking about their experiences, but I'm not sure if it is available with English subtitles. It is available on You Tube, if I remember correctly.

The plural of anecdotes is not data.

For a while, the officials did not believe claims of famine. Local officials even adopted some rather archaic methods (used during the darker days of the Civil War) whereby they would cut a village off from the world for a few days, in order to prompt them to dig out their secret reserves. If the starvation continued, they knew that the people weren't lying. Once it became apparent that there was in fact a famine, however, grain was sent into the affected areas, not out. But again, as I said, there was nothing which specifically targeted Ukrainians, it affected Russians, Kazakhs, Bashkorts, just the same.

Probably the truth is in the middle - to some extent it was natural famine, but to some extent also deliberate policy to eliminate "uncomfortable peasants" (please remember that most of Ukrainian peasants were conservative and religious, many of them were also nationalists or monarchists who wanted the return of Tsars to the throne and the return of old Imperial times - they were not enthusiastic followers of Communism, as some people may think - thus their death was very comfortable for the Soviet government - the fewer Ukrainian peasants, the stronger support for Communism).

As I said, it was impossible to tell who was a Ukrainian, or a Russian, or a Ukrainian-speaking Russian, in those times. The passport system had just barely been introduced and was incomplete. Even if Ukrainians did feel that way, which I don't feel comfortable stating that they generally did, famine would be the very last way to deal with that fact.

Stalin did not worry to Voroshilov, in a private letter during the famine, that "we may lose the Ukraine," for no reason. It would also be extremely stupid to stir up an ethnicity through ethnic-based victimization, which lives on the borderlands, has contacts in other countries (Ukrainians in Poland, for example), and whom the Soviets had extensive intelligence on attempts to stir up trouble for them in that region by the Polish and Japanese governments. There is quite simple no way and no reason for a purposeful famine in Ukraine, or for victimization of Ukrainians in any way at that time.
 
Either way, justifying hate and ignorance by pointing at things like that is just silly.. also a bit stupid.

"Some people in far away places have done some silly things, justifying our hate and ignorance"

With sentiments like those, you'll never get anyone on your side, except maybe a couple more extremists. Let the Lenins tumble all the way to Vladivostok!
 
Through the enforcement of homosexual laws. Like the above: people of Ukraine do not want terms "mother" and "father" being eliminated.

If you think Maidanists are for this, you're wrong. Most of them are for some kind of European integration or association, yes. But homosexualization not included. And those UPA militants of Maidan will hang gays on the same street lamps they hang "Jydy" (Jews) and "Moskali" (Muscovites, Russians).



All you do is whining for proofs, while I give tons of them here and you give no citation at all, only empty whining. Oh, I've noticed your nickname now.

Just don't talk directly to me anymore, please.

As long as you continue to espouse homophobic, bigoted rhetoric i will continue to directly talk to you. Also, the irony of you warning us about how Ukrainians will hang gays when Russia is literally, at this minute, almost as bad as what you claim Ukraine will descend into.
 
Either way, justifying hate and ignorance by pointing at things like that is just silly.. also a bit stupid.

"Some people in far away places have done some silly things, justifying our hate and ignorance"

With sentiments like those, you'll never get anyone on your side, except maybe a couple more extremists. Let the Lenins tumble all the way to Vladivostok!

I really don't see how that addresses my post in any way, shape, or form.
 
You may burst with butthurt, but the majority here, in post-Soviet countries, and in the world laugh about homosexual orientation of Europe of recent years. And all the ugly things they do in the name of it. Like this: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-favor-gender-specific-parent-1-parent-2.html (Education department eliminates the terms 'mother' and 'father' in favor of less gender-specific 'parent 1' and 'parent 2')

Changing forms to suit tbe children of both heterosexual and homosexual couples instead of only heterosexual couples only brings advantages. Homosexuality is in no way inferior to heterosexuality. Refusal to accept that is most likely based on old beliefs with no pragmatic basis.

Just don't talk directly to me anymore, please.

Yes, that's the attitude for a public forum.
 
I will try to write more about this later.

Well, do it in a separate thread, please.

***

ZAPOROZHYE

3217.jpg


"No to Fascism! No to nationalism! Off the Bandera's dog", they burn a dummy of Bandera. "Fascist shall not pass!"


Link to video.

***

People are warming-up


Link to video.

***

January. Anti-Maidanist meeting. Maidanist kids claim they are locals and against radicalism.


Link to video.

***

Petition for the Sotheast to enter Russian Federation. (the site is over-trafficed)

https://secure.avaaz.org/ru/petitio...krainy_v_sostav_Rossiyskoy_Federacii/?cQjEYgb

EeLspkv.jpg


m9panPm.png


M5s2ist.png


r1MPTs1.png


L094khb.png
 
He's annoyed that someone had the gall to call him out on his hypocrisy, of the Maidan protesters being homophobic, whilst Russia, It's law, and himself as well, aren't any better, literally no better, than those he claims will start stringing gays up.
 
He's annoyed that someone had the gall to call him out on his hypocrisy, of the Maidan protesters being homophobic, whilst Russia, It's law, and himself as well, aren't any better, literally no better, than those he claims will start stringing gays up.

I don't care what his government does with gays - being Russian doesn't make him responsible for it- but the word 'ugly' in the part I quoted betrayed his actualy opinion on homosexuality and indeed reveals his bigotry.
 
True, but his tacit support of his government and their stance on LGBT is relevant.
 
Changing forms to suit tbe children of both heterosexual and homosexual couples instead of only heterosexual couples only brings advantages. Homosexuality is in no way inferior to heterosexuality. Refusal to accept that is most likely based on old beliefs with no pragmatic basis.

It's quite simply a cultural thing. I don't know why, but Russians and Ukrainians simply hate gays, but you don't see Russia, say, pushing the US to ban creationism on a federal level (which is actually a localized problem unlike homophobia which is present in like 90% of the world, including 50% of the US). Just saying that while homophobia is bad, being hypocritical about it is not the way to go.
 
I wouldn't say "always", but sometimes it is, yes. It's just populism, a way to get easy popularity among conservatives.

Fair enough, I suppose.
 
I really don't see how that addresses my post in any way, shape, or form.

It doesn't - I wrote "Either way", meaning that whether your post is true or not, {my post}

I suppose it was moreso (if not fully) directed at Aleksey_aka_al
 
but the word 'ugly' in the part I quoted betrayed his actualy opinion on homosexuality and indeed reveals his bigotry.

Changing "mother" and "father" to "parent 1" and "parent 2" is ugly, yes. Requiring, legally, men to sit while uriniting is ugly, yes. Teaching toddlers and young children of homosexuality is ugly, yes. Encouraging them to become homosexuals is ugly, yes. Forcing parentless children to be adopted by homosexual pairs is ugly, yes.

Forcing millions, billions of people of other cultures to praise and encourage homosexuality the way Westerners started to do it very very recently is ugly and close to Fascism. Since the so-called "homophobia", whether it is there or not, is used as an excuse to forcefully subdue other nations through blockade and civil wars ignited from the outside.

From this point your so called multi-culturalism, in reality, is assimilation to one global culture and has nothing to with co-existing of diverse cultures.

***

DONETSK

People gratefully meet Berkut:


Link to video.

***

SEVASTOPOL

"Thank you! Thank you! Good guys!". An officer tells that their unit done the job of keeping order in the Hero City of Kiev (a Soviet honory title awarded for outstanding heroism during WWII). A man with loud-speaker says that while they were defending Yanukovich's authority Yanukovich betrayed them, but Sevastopol will never betray Berkuts which are their heroes. A woman says to Berkut: "Thank you guys for you to be alive!"


Link to video.

***

"Meeting of people's will" is choosing new city mayor. They talk about Yanukovich's betrayal and his coward flight in the face of extremists. Sevastopol does not recognize the new Rada. Veterans tell the reporter that Nazis they fought and defeated are back and younger people now will probably have to repeat what veterans did in their time.


Link to video.
 
It doesn't - I wrote "Either way", meaning that whether your post is true or not, {my post}

I suppose it was moreso (if not fully) directed at Aleksey_aka_al

Ah. Well I'm not exactly defending the hate being voiced in this thread (unless it's directed at fascists), most especially the anti-gay stuff. I was simply addressing the historical issue.
 
Changing "mother" and "father" to "parent 1" and "parent 2" is ugly, yes. Requiring, legally, men to sit while uriniting is ugly, yes. Teaching toddlers and young children of homosexuality is ugly, yes. Encouraging them to become homosexuals is ugly, yes. Forcing parentless children to be adopted by homosexual pairs is ugly, yes.

Neither of these is ugly according to me. I think that proves it just boils down to values. You see homosexuality as a perverted way of thought and even a part of culture - I see it as an urge (as in sexual desire - just like heterosexuality, really) which albeit deviant from the norm and not exactly positive for recreation shouldn't be suppressed or despised.

And I nowhere declared my full support for LGBT couples raising orphans.

Encouraging them to become homosexuals is ugly, yes.

You see homosexuality as a lifestyle, here it is considered as a fixed personality trait. You can't encourage someone to develop a fixed personality trait (contradictio in terminis), but from your point of view tolerance towards outing oneself might indeed seem like that.


Forcing millions, billions of people of other cultures to praise and encourage homosexuality the way Westerners started to do it very very recently

Well, apparently our 'forcing' doesn't stop you from calling out against it if you like. I for certain am not forced to side partly with the LGBT movement in this thread.

is ugly and close to Fascism.

Fascism is a form of authoritarian nationalism and has nothing to with this.

Since the so-called "homophobia", whether it is there or not, is used as an excuse to forcefully subdue other nations through blockade and civil wars ignited from outside.

Wikipedia: Homophobia encompasses a range of negative attitudes and feelings toward homosexuality or people who are identified or perceived as being lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT).

I think it's rather clear you fall into this camp, and whether you take homophobia as an insult or not is entirely up to you.

From this point your so called multi-culturalism is in reallity assimilation to one global culture and has nothing to with co-existing of diverse cultures.

I don't see where multi-culturalism entered the discussion.
 
There are enough threads about homosexuality, gay rights, etc. This is not one of them.

***

Be warned, the following will harm some Russophobic butts for sure!

To Gorbachev: "Should the Ukranian borders remain as they are?"

Gorbachev: "Well, this is Ukrainians to decide. As for me, I am for Ukranian borders to remain, but I am also for Soviet borders to remain! I was against their Belavezha Accords. This is a lesson. But this is my opinion, and there are people there, so I want everything to settle down there. Listen though, this is terrible: there are consultants from USA and EU there! Buldozers are needed to drive away those American and European consultants. Let people decide. Ukrainians are nice people."


Link to video.
 
Cheezy,

The plural of anecdotes is not data.

Eye-witness reports and victim testimonies are not "anecdotes".

As I said, it was impossible to tell who was a Ukrainian, or a Russian, or a Ukrainian-speaking Russian, in those times.

1926 population census in Soviet Ukraine fully disagrees with you:

http://gis.huri.harvard.edu/map-gallery/demography/ethnic-composition.html

Ukrainians_1926.png


Russians_1926.png


Majorities_1926.png


Apparently Soviet census takers found a way to tell who was Ukrainian and who was Russian.
 
Back
Top Bottom