Perfection
The Great Head.
It's not just people, reality is only algorithms.
Claiming to be the best fit for the evidence at hand does not bring one to that conclusion. An algorithm is just a human construct that we impose on what we see to help us make sense of what is complex. One thing we can say though is that evolution does not shy away from complexity. Simple organisms are common, but complex ones seem to keep making their appearances even after vast destruction. To add consciousness to this discussion, we would have to define it in some way.By claiming to be right. As warpus has said, bio-design is absolutely amazing. Without a "designer", relatively blind and "dumb" algorithms must be able to do amazing design-work. Because that is all evolution got to work with.
The key to great design - which in its greatness appears almost magical - then is the mere assembly of in themselves pretty ordinary or rudimentary design elements which chance can produce so plentiful that eventually they will assemble in an intelligent way all by themselves.
That is pretty much the anti-thesis to the mythical idea of a human consciousness which is more than the sum of its parts.
Our reality is an illusion on which we impose various orderly processes to help us cope.It's not just people, reality is only algorithms.
Everything is mathOur reality is an illusion on which we impose various orderly processes to help us cope.![]()
I'm sorry Dave.Everything is math
Math is God
God alone is
Better than being ordered around by a moron (i.e. the people we keep voting into office)
People, by and large, would rather be badly but accountably governed, than well but unaccountably governed.Better than being ordered around by a moron (i.e. the people we keep voting into office)
God alone is; math alone is; etc has a history that goes back at least a decade at CFC. It comes out of the many "god based" threads we have had here. Perfection made that particular post and worded it for my amusement. He knows my weaknesses.Why is it always 'only' x? People are 'only' or 'just' algorithms? Isn't being an algorithm enough for you? Picasso's Guernice is literally 'only' paint on canvas. Beethoven's 9th is 'only' dots on a piece of paper. A supercomputer is 'only' 1s and 0s.
This reminds me back when I was 16 and I flipped out because of determinism. People are 'only' the sum of their experiences and outside influences. Well, a few months after that I had that epiphany that probably many people had:
Isn't it enough to be 'only' a product? Do we really need free will or is 'only' the illusion of free will enough? I don't believe in determinism anymore and I've had many a existential crisis since, but this one insight stuck with me. Don't be reductive. I would be glad to be an algorithm, not 'only' an algorithm.
People, by and large, would rather be badly but accountably governed, than well but unaccountably governed.
Why not both?
God alone is; math alone is; etc has a history that goes back at least a decade at CFC. It comes out of the many "god based" threads we have had here. Perfection made that particular post and worded it for my amusement. He knows my weaknesses.![]()
Why is it always 'only' x? People are 'only' or 'just' algorithms? Isn't being an algorithm enough for you? Picasso's Guernice is literally 'only' paint on canvas. Beethoven's 9th is 'only' dots on a piece of paper. A supercomputer is 'only' 1s and 0s.
This reminds me back when I was 16 and I flipped out because of determinism. People are 'only' the sum of their experiences and outside influences. Well, a few months after that I had that epiphany that probably many people had:
Isn't it enough to be 'only' a product? Do we really need free will or is 'only' the illusion of free will enough? I don't believe in determinism anymore and I've had many a existential crisis since, but this one insight stuck with me. Don't be reductive. I would be glad to be an algoritm, not 'only' an algorithm.