Well, given that you haven't even explained either what the position is supposed to be or what it is on, plus the fact that you claim to be at once both a Protestant and a Roman Catholic, then, no
what he said, not to mention is is impossible to be both a catholic and a protestant. One cannot serve two masters in any manner whatsoever.
God and Mammon, not money.
My intuition says that the RCC is in the same position the Jewish Sanhedrin was in when Jesus was alive. I am not trying to start a debate, and hope not to keep having to ask questions in this line of thought. I just would like to see what kind of defense (more than a few sentences) that would persuade me otherwise. So I am asking, can someone humor me? Thanks.
Well, given that you haven't even explained either what the position is supposed to be or what it is on, plus the fact that you claim to be at once both a Protestant and a Roman Catholic, then, no
Yes, the term Catholic did apply to Christians long before the "Roman" Catholic Church, but that is because Roman was a pejorative by Anglicans, but in reality the Catholic Church (the holy union of the Catholic Churches with the Vicar of Christ as its head) was the original use for catholic, because it is a universal Church.Actually, the two masters are God and money
(Yeah, Protestants serve God and Catholics serve money)
But on a non-totally joking note, I think Timtofly's point was that the term "catholic" was around long before the RCC. In fact, the term originally in fact referred to any and all Christians. Now, it refers particularly to Roman Catholicism and Eastern Catholicism. I think Timtofly was trying to make a philosophical point that you guys are specifically Roman Catholics, not just catholic. But that's a pointless argument.
I just call myself Evangelical Protestant and be done with it![]()
no, no it isn't. Mammon is rather distinct from moneyDepends on translation
And Mammon is another word for money.
To clarify: The Sanhedrin had lawers who interpreted the law so people would know exactly what they were disobeying and how to take care of the situation. In other words, they had the letter of the "law" down firm, but not the "spirit" of the law. They did not even recognize Jesus as the Son of God, but thought he was trying to "overthrow" their belief system. BTW, He did not overthrow it, He finished and completed it by dying as GOD to fulfill the law once and for all.
RCC claims to have the "spirit" and the "law" down firm, but do they? Is it time for Jesus to return and "clean house"? I am not trolling, nor being funny. To me it is serious business, that the masses of people may not be getting the "spirit" of the Church as much as they are getting the "letter" of the Church. I would say Protestants are not any better, but then no one has asked this over in their thread. I am asking it here though, to see what your answer would be. Silence is ok also, if you prefer not to answer.
Mammon descends from Late Latin, then Greek and finally Aramaic, meaning material wealth or possessions, usually with a debasing element. It's not simply money.
Didn't it just say that "the love of money" is "the root of all evil"?
Spoiler :Loving money is not evil, but can lead you toward evil. Money is not evil, but if you trust in it it will lead you toward evil.
Some people serve neither God nor mammon. Those who are luke warm.
Spoiler :What Jehoshua said about masters is we cannot serve the pope and God at the same time I think. The pope is God on earth and Protestants believe God is in heaven, unless he wants to clearify the term master for us?
I am just hearing definitions, where is the spirit?![]()
Have you ever heard of curiosity killed the cat?
If I had buried it deeper would it have still confused you?