Let's face it the number of modern miracles compared to renaissance miracles and those compared to classical miracles and so on appear to have a disparity per capita let alone without taking population into account. I'm sure the rise of philosophy and later science has more than a little to do with that. Most old miracles were not well documented, not rigorously tested, and not subject even to the scrutiny and attention the Catholics place on miracles these days. That explains a lot.
Most of them were no doubt fraudulent, subject to Chinese whispers, and based on a poor understanding of the way things work. Faith is no different than the power of suggestion in it's ability to skew results. Hell witchcraft and Voodoo work on the fact that if you can convince someone something is going to happen, or if they are religiously primed it's easy to see occurrences as magical or miraculous even if they are not.
Miracles that Jesus did? Well to be honest there aren't any documented cases from the time of Jesus form eye witnesses, so a lot of that even is subject to academic and historic scrutiny. If he did do it, fine it's miraculous, but there are accounts of him never having performed miracles, ok they are all lies and heretical

, but then everything outside of organised religion is heretical and lies broadly, so it's hard to take things with a critical eye, when your remit is to deny anything that doesn't agree with your own dogmatic interpretation. Never makes much sense to me to do so.
Any account has it's bs and fact, to take one account as Gospel absolutely, seems to be the opposite of what historians do, which is to sift all accounts for bs and fact accordingly. Religion seems to be exempt from the usual critical process, this to me sends up all sorts of warning signals. Especially knowing how fallible any account is, which is based on word of mouth, second hand testimony or anything that is not part of the original testimony. Hell even that is subject to error, as policemen around the world know. You can get several different interpretations even from those present at the time, and outside of religion, take some religiously primed and somewhat more fanatical adherents, and well?
Ok I know I'm not allowed on this thread by decree of not being a Christian, but frankly that's lame. If you don't want to talk about anything openly then go join a private forum that only let's the adherents in. This is A forum not a private club for the discerning Christian, I couldn't care less for your half arsed rules.

