The efforts to combat the basmachi movement eventually included a sort of acceptance of the existence of Islam, since, surprisingly, out-and-out secularism didn't play well in Central Asia. This mostly extended to the reopening of madrasas and other Islamic learning institutions, the reversal of the nationalization of some waqf land, and the limited reintroduction of shari'a.Didn't the Soviets try to create some sort of Islamic Communism?
A stereotype I hear is that "religion and communism don't mix". Would you say this is true? Can someone be a devout religious follower yet still be a communist?
Ask Kier Hardie, or the Dalai Lama.
Buddhism is more of a philosophy? So, nirvana, and spirits, and such, amke it a philosophy? Oh dear.
1. I looked up Kier Hardie on wikipedia. It says he was an advocate for the British Labour party. The british labour party, from what I understand is certainly left wing, but that doesn't make it communist. The things you all have previously stated you believe in "abolishments of wages" or "abolishments of private property" etc, is not really what the labour party does. They seem to be more socialist than communist.
2. I thought Buddhism was more of a philosophy than a religion, and in that case I don't see why it would be relevant.
Yes, it's a set of spiritual beliefs. And, since Communism/Socialism are temporal, not spiritual beliefs, they shouldn't be mutually exclusive. If you ban religion and spirituality you're curtailing freedom of thought.Oh well. My high school Sociology/Psychology/Economics teacher was an idiot anyway.
I didn't know buddhism had those things. It was explained to me that buddhist do not believe in any God, or supernatural things, and they should "free" themselves from those things, to make themselves "pure" or something like that.
Well, supposing you're correct, that pretty much clinches the argument. If buddhist believe in those things, then they are indeed a religion. And thus, if the Dali Lama is a communist, he counts as a religious communist.
In a way he was right. Of course it's a metaphor, but the primitive collectivism and horizontality of the early Christian communities wasn't that far from the ideal communistic society, eh?He was a Scottish lay preacher who taught that Jesus was the first communist.
While on the topic (by the way, you missed a question on the previous page, I'm just mentioning), was Albania a communist country during Enver Hoxha? I'm pretty sure that they were pretty far from achieving Marx' ideals, but were they on the right track?
How would you comment the schism between Albania and the USSR?
Probably the most successful forms of communism have been hose practiced in small voluntary communities of devoutly religious individuals. The early christian church was far closer to true communism than any state has been.
Marxist ideology is rather hostile to religion, but the Marxists do not have a monopoly on either socialism or communism.
Who knows, but please post a less biased source, I wouldn't put it past Faux News to simply make it up, at least with the Onion you know they're just deadpan snarkers.
"WorldNetDaily (WND) is an American web site that publishes news and associated content from the perspective of U.S. conservatives and the political right"
Right off Wikipedia. Please.
Really? "The Manchurian President"? From a site that says that the reaction should be 'Yikes!'?