Ask an Evangelical Christian

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
22,750
Location
Wherever my name is posted
Well, this thread is the intellectual descendent of "Ask a Protestant (By me)" and "Ask a Protestant II (By Timtofly)" but it is a little different.

If you'll recall, my first thread was originally a joke title "Ask a Heretic who deserves to be stoned to death" which, while obviously a joke title, the new title created a lot of controversy as well, as there was considerable debate as to who Protestants are.

This thread is meant to be more specific. The following are preresequites for being an Evangelical Christian, as determined by the thread-starter.

1. You must accept the Original Manuscripts of the Bible as the infallible, Inerrant word of God. (Which modern translation you like best does not matter.) Note, you do not have to acknowledge that every part of the Bible is LITERAL, only that it is TRUE. If you say you accept the Bible as infallible and inerrant, I'll take your word for it. As long as you meet the other criteria.

2. You must accept that Christ died to pay the penalty for sin, that he rose again on the third day, and that someday he shall return, as is defined in the Bible.

3. You must not accept Church Tradition of any kind as infallible. You may believe certain traditions are useful or correct, but they are not inspired by God (Basically, Catholic and Orthodox Christianity isn't Evangelical Christianity, but there may be some other place I don't think of.)

4. No cultists or anyone outside the general Orthodoxy of Evangelical Christianity allowed. Jehovah's Witnesses, Unitarians, Mormons, exc. are not Evangelicals. This probably goes without saying, but I still felt the need to include it.

5. You must accept the Great Commission in Matthew 28, 19-20 to be an important part of Christianity.

If you do NOT fit within one of these categories, you may still respond to a question, assuming one or the other of the following:

1. The question is directly pointed at you (If someone asks you, feel free to answer it, regardless. If you don't fit the criteria though, it is courtesy to ask that such questions be taken elsewhere if they are repeated. Most Christian faiths (Catholics, Mormons, and Protestants, although strangely enough the Orthodox don't have one, yes Random I am talking to you;)) are represented in an "Ask A..." thread, and if not, you can make one.

2. The question is answered from the POV of an Evangelical Christian. Don't do this too often, but if its something you agree with the general consensus of Evangelicalism on it, you can go ahead and answer, but be careful when doing so that your beliefs are in fact agreed upon by Evangelicals in that area. If not, I will kindly request you stop doing it.

And obviously, anyone can ask questions, but in the interest of peace, the following questions are not allowed.

1. Political arguments on homosexuality. If you want to ask a question about the Evangelical position about such things, go ahead. But don't take it into an argument on gay marriage or such or I'll report you.

2. Arguing about other political issues, in the same vein as above (We get homosexuality A LOT in the other threads.)

3. Scientific debate on the accuracy of the Bible. Again, not necessary, and off topic.

I will also note that this thread is intended to be more specific than the other thread. With that, I am no longer leading the Ask A Protestant thread. I will answer anything relevant if it is ever bumped, but I will no longer try to keep it in line. I'm managing this thread now.

Also, I used the Red Diamond. This is a SERIOUS DISCUSSION, a place to ASK QUESTIONS. Debate is allowed within the ordinary perimeters allowed in the other "Ask a..." threads, and not beyond this. Any violators will be reported. Thank you, and ask away:)
 
I'll get the ball rolling...

Is a commitment to the young earth doctrine a core principle of evangelical Christianity? That is, can one simultaneously be an evangelical Christian while rejecting the idea of a young earth?
 
Alright then. What makes you an 'Evangelical' Christian and not any other type of Christian? Also, is there anything in Christianity that makes you think 'I don't think that's true', or anything to do with science or other religions that you believe to be true and not what is said to be true in Christianity?
 
Is a commitment to the young earth doctrine a core principle of evangelical Christianity? That is, can one simultaneously be an evangelical Christian while rejecting the idea of a young earth?

I think that depends who you ask. My opinion is no, although I myself do accept a young Earth.

I would say Traditional Evolution is a slippery slope though, since it essentially says man is an animal. I'd still say its possible, but it is a bit slippery. Mainly because the special Creation of Adam is pretty important to the rest of the message of the Bible. And Original Sin is VERY imporant.

But the age of the Earth itself doesn't matter all that much IMO. Of course, I do know people who will say Evolutionists can't be Christians period, so it depends on the Evangelical. But in summary, I would say its possible.

Alright then. What makes you an 'Evangelical' Christian and not any other type.

Well, first of all, Evangelical Christianity is not a denomination, in case you didn't know. Its a loose affiliation, as described here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evangelicalism

And the prime reason is that I agree with their beliefs.

Specifically, I attend a Baptist Church, but I don't really call myself Baptist since I don't agree with ALL of their tenants. I do agree with all of the core Evangelical tenants.

Also, is there anything in Christianity that makes you think 'I don't think that's true', or anything to do with science or other religions that you believe to be true and not what is said to be true in Christianity?

This question is very complicated. For one thing, there's a difference between "Christianity" in general, or even more specifically "Evangelical Christianity" in general, and the specific teachings of the Bible or the church I attend. To which, if the Bible says something, it is true, though some things are not literal of course.

As for other religions, there is some truth to them, but whenever they disagree with the Bible, they are wrong, and they can NEVER lead a person to Salvation.
 
I've always wanted to ask you or Classical_Hero this: why do you think people like me go out of our way to fight YEC claims? And perhaps on a slightly theological bent, why do you think God made people like me who fight such claims?
 
What differentiates Evangelicals from those you have dismissed as cultists? Why are they cultists and Evangelicals not?

Well, those who are in what I'm defining as cults know who they are. And I'm not even being mean by saying cults. My point is simply that their doctrine is totally outside the norm of Christian orthodoxy. I wanted to make sure that say, a Jehovah's Witness didn't try to answer in this thread on the grounds that they were Evangelical based on my other points:rolleyes:

If the Bible is literal word of God, then why does your "all-knowing" God seem to suck at science, history, geography, ethics, etc. so much?

He doesn't.

I've always wanted to ask you or Classical_Hero this: why do you think people like me go out of our way to fight YEC claims?

Because you have a free will and you choose to do so.

And perhaps on a slightly theological bent, why do you think God made people like me who fight such claims?

Again, free will, you chose to fight those claims. Even according to most Predestination theories, generally the choice to argue or not argue is generally not considered to be Predestined.
 
Well, those who are in what I'm defining as cults know who they are. And I'm not even being mean by saying cults. My point is simply that their doctrine is totally outside the norm of Christian orthodoxy. I wanted to make sure that say, a Jehovah's Witness didn't try to answer in this thread on the grounds that they were Evangelical based on my other points:rolleyes:
So if you are not being mean by saying cults, is it ok for me to call you a cultist because your beliefs our outside the mainstream of those that share my beliefs?
 
As for other religions, there is some truth to them, but whenever they disagree with the Bible, they are wrong, and they can NEVER lead a person to Salvation.

In your opinion, of course. And I'd also like to ask what JollyRoger has asked.
 
My personal belief (And note that there are a lot of disagreement among Evangelicals on this point) is that speaking in tongues means a literal language, and that it is NOT given to everyone (Its a spiritual gift, and every person has different gifts) however I do believe it could, at least theoretically, happen today.

What about snake handling?

Do not test the Lord thy God (Addressed at snake handlers, not you for asking the question.)

In your opinion, of course.

Well, that's the standard Evangelical answer. In fact, I've never heard of an Evangelical that didn't give that answer.

And I'd also like to ask what JollyRoger has asked.

About cults?

From the first page of Wikipedia:

The word cult pejoratively refers to a group whose beliefs or practices are considered abnormal or bizarre.

While I wasn't trying to be mean, to call those outside the mainstream of Christianity "Cultists" is fairly normal Evangelical terminology. Its not an attempt to be mean, merely a way of differentiating between mainstream and non-mainstream Christianity as well. I've even heard the Catholic Church called a cult before, though I don't use that terminology (Hence why I defined them separately.)

Basically, I explained my purpose. I didn't want Jehovah's Witnesses or such hijacking the thread claiming to be Evangelicals based on a loophole in my definitions. I wasn't trying to be mean or ultra-exclusive. If you have more questions about this, please contact me privately.
 
Can a 2-year-old child comment on the complex workings of quantum mechanics and molecular biology, and yield useful and correct conclusions?

What makes you think humans can comment on the divine and do the same?
 
BTW the above post wasn't meant to be trollish. My grandmother herself has seen snake handling though she didn't belong to a snake handling church, she used to go as a teenager as a form of entertainment, she lived in a small town. Her and her friends would sit in the back and run out the back door when the minister went to the back with the snakes.

My father's family used to go to a church where they would speak in tongues when he was a child but he always thought it was creepy and never went to one as an adult.
 
What theological studies have you completed to give you the ability to speak on behalf of Evangelical Christians?

What Biblical passages refute Arianism?

How do I know which Mosaic Laws are no longer in effect? My copy of the bible uses and older translation, so I may have missed the Appendix included in the next edition.
 
I have a question.

What is god? If I meet a person and I assume that he or she is god, can I determine the truth of my assumption with n logical steps?
 
I have a question.

What is god? If I meet a person and I assume that he or she is god, can I determine the truth of my assumption with n logical steps?

The general idea is that you can't use logical steps, you need to take a leap of faith.

The question becomes - where do you take that leap of faith? The Bible? The Qu'ran? The hobo on the street? If you can circumvent logic altogether, you can circumvent it anywhere.
 
1. You must accept the Original Manuscripts of the Bible as the infallible, Inerrant word of God. (Which modern translation you like best does not matter.) Note, you do not have to acknowledge that every part of the Bible is LITERAL, only that it is TRUE. If you say you accept the Bible as infallible and inerrant, I'll take your word for it. As long as you meet the other criteria.

I would say Traditional Evolution is a slippery slope though, since it essentially says man is an animal. I'd still say its possible, but it is a bit slippery. Mainly because the special Creation of Adam is pretty important to the rest of the message of the Bible. And Original Sin is VERY imporant.
...
This question is very complicated. For one thing, there's a difference between "Christianity" in general, or even more specifically "Evangelical Christianity" in general, and the specific teachings of the Bible or the church I attend. To which, if the Bible says something, it is true, though some things are not literal of course.

As for other religions, there is some truth to them, but whenever they disagree with the Bible, they are wrong, and they can NEVER lead a person to Salvation.

Slippery slope indeed.

1) What are some examples of non-literal truths?

2) Who makes the decisions about which truths are literal and which aren't?

3) Can people disagree about which parts are literal and which aren't, without someone going to hell?
 
Can a 2-year-old child comment on the complex workings of quantum mechanics and molecular biology, and yield useful and correct conclusions?

I'd assume not, but you never know:lol:

What makes you think humans can comment on the divine and do the same?

The idea is God gave us the Bible, which his Spirit inspired, to tell us these things.

BTW the above post wasn't meant to be trollish. My grandmother herself has seen snake handling though she didn't belong to a snake handling church, she used to go as a teenager as a form of entertainment, she lived in a small town.

I know, I just didn't feel like typing an original response when I could so easily quote Scripture. I know your question was genuine.

Her and her friends would sit in the back and run out the back door when the minister went to the back with the snakes.

:lol:

My father's family used to go to a church where they would speak in tongues when he was a child but he always thought it was creepy and never went to one as an adult.

They don't at our church, and IIRC our church doctrine says it can't really happen, although I do disagree with my church if it does. Its not like its something that's likely to affect me though. Even if it can happen, at least 99% of those who claim they are speaking in tongues are probably liars, and I doubt you'd ever really hear of the genuine ones.

What theological studies have you completed to give you the ability to speak on behalf of Evangelical Christians?

I'm not. This thread is open to any Evangelical Christian. I'm just the thread-starter.

What Biblical passages refute Arianism?

How many times have I answered this?

http://www.spotlightministries.org.uk/bowmanonthetrinity.htm

I have a question.

What is god? If I meet a person and I assume that he or she is god, can I determine the truth of my assumption with n logical steps?

Algebra isn't my strong point, nor is philosophy. I have no idea how to answer this.
 
Do you believe that the 'miracles' or demonstrations of magical/supernatural abilities or phenomena that are claimed by non-Christian religious groups, such as Hindus for example, are motivated and empowered by the devil?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom