We left for far more reasons than what we told everyone.After Brittany stormed out of the League of Continental Nations on a whim, the Empire of Scandinavia is not entirely confident that it can handle such a commitment as agreeing to host the Olympics. Would not the Bretons "flake" as the Americans say, and decide that the city of Brest had more important things to be getting on with? Who is to say that the municipal authority might not decide to hold the annual "Brie Festival" at the same time? We do not trust these Bretons and their Maryland-class cheese.![]()
You dare vote against your ally?
Brittany would be the best place for the Olympics to occur in since:
1. We are neutral, and there wouldn't be as much country bashing at the Olympics. We offer this in the interests of the athletes because in other countries, a hostile mob could easily overrun the security due the recent Global War and the populations generally hating each other. In Brittany, the chance of having a mob against a certain group of countries, would be minimal.
2. We will handle as much of the costs as possible if the Olympics come to Brittany.
3. We are the least unlikely country to cause a cancellation of the Olympics since we are neutral and both sides in the recent Global War have agreed on Brittany being neutral.
4. We are a small country, and it would be awesome for us to host the Olympics just this once.
From: Amadeus Friedman, President of the German Economic League
To: The Papal States
CC: Italian States, Nations Involving Themselves
Ample time has been given, and your hesitance, and complete disinterest in preserving peace in the Italian Peninsula leaves the combined military's of Austria and Brandenburg little choice but to commit to a police action to see that the very fair and reasonable Freidman proposal goes through. You are the only belligerent nation that has refused to give up ground on the matter of Italian Unification, and as such, will experience the prowess of the combined German military. We have informed our policing units to see to it that the proposal go through, and they will assuredly do just that. Should our policing units enter Papal Territory, and find themselves under attack from Partisans, or official Papal forces, they have been given express permission to use any means necessary in protecting themselves, and completing their mission.
At the same time, if our policing units are to enter into Papal Territory, and find an army or government willing to work with us in seeing that fair and honest plebiscites go through, and help administrate said plebiscites, we all may rest easy knowing that blood wasn't unnecessarily spilled. There is no time that is to be viewed as 'too late' for peace. We would much prefer this alternative a thousand times over, yet your silence has been defeaning on the matter, and we are forced to assume. To reiterate, our previous offers for peace without German soldiers still stands, the only difference between then and now is simply time.
We would also like to invite military units from both the Italian Republic and Naples to operate in support of our soldiers, should the need arise. Soldiers from respective governments will be kept in separate theaters of operation, to prevent any possible flare ups that may occur.
Also, we would like to note that as of now, we consider the waters of the Papal States to be blockaded, and the German fleet will treat the area as a war zone.
That is all.
OOC: As has been pointed out to me, Jehoshua hasn't been on the forums for awhile, and I am aware parts of the East Coast have been getting hit with storms fairly bad, so my apologies if that is the cause of the delay. I'm just rushing to figure out what to do with my orders. As I said IC, there is not time that is 'too late'.
Here's why I voted for Brest:
-
To: the Germans
From: The Papal States
-
The Papal States has attempted to preserve peace in the Italian peninsula despite your scurrilous claims. It has attempted to create a ceasefire between it and Naples, it has engaged with dialogue with the continental powers over the precise form a division in the Friedman proposal would take.
However throughout all of this the powers have shown a disgusting lack of respect for the sovereignty of the papal states, and the liberty of the Church. Naples, confirming precisely our worst fears has in blatantly aggressive has not only rejected dialogue and our supposed cease-fire, but in rhetoric has proclaimed that it would depose the pope and put someone it likes in power! This "intervention" furthermore is a blatant violation of the treaty of Tullieres, which thanks to Neapolitan inability to agree to a ceasefire is ongoing.
To: The Papal States
From: Naples
We never said we would put someone we like in power, all we said was if the Pope dies during the war they can always be replaced AND if we were in control of the Italian State, which will consume Rome since the Pope is not agreeing to the proposal, then we would allow a new Pope to be elected by normal means of electing a Pope.