amadeus
Bishop of Bio-Dome
You know things are good for your country when you're willing to risk death in order to escape it.
Indeed.Wait, when did the Cuban system ever work?![]()
• Only 4% of Cuban peasants ate meat regularly; only 1% ate fish, less than 2% eggs, 3% bread, 11% milk; none ate green vegetables.
You know things are good for your country when you're willing to risk death in order to escape it.
They risked death doing it? Also, how many of such people were there, approximately?Like the Blacks who migrated from the USA to the USSR, right? Though I honestly think you would approve of that.
We took them from Spain and kept them for ourselves and our corporate interests. Ever heard of the Platt Amendment? We consistently backed brutal dictators for the simple reason that it was profitable. Then when they revolted we tried to suppress them(which is so disgustingly hypocritical I don't even want to get into it) via the Bay of Pigs as well as numerous assassination attempts on Castro.Which ones, exactly? Ostentatiously, we "liberated", them from an "oppressive", Spanish colonial government, though by the time of the revolution that was decades in the past. They pretty quickly got back some form of sovereignty, at least not as a nominal dominion of the United States (Puerto Rico), after said incident, and since then and prior to the Revolution were a quiet vacation spot with a head of state unpopular with the native population.
If his regime will die out naturally then why are we trying to force it with the blockade?Addressing the first portion of your post, exactly, the Cold War is over. Communism is a dead societal force in the immediate vision of the geopolitical stage, so Castro's "system", has no place in the "modern world", as it were. It's natural to expect his regime to die out with him and his immediate lieutenants. Addressing any sort of message for observation and study to his efforts is a point best left well alone; the Cuban Revolution has no meaning anymore. It is history, will remain so barring any sort of major conflict within Cuba following the end of the "Castro Regime", and will fade well into the past as time moves on.
That numbered several hundred out of millions?Like the Blacks who migrated from the USA to the USSR, right?
Well, it certainly weeded out the ones goony enough to think that Stalinism was better than having to sit on the back of the bus.Though I honestly think you would approve of that.
You know things are good for your country when you're willing to risk death in order to escape it.
If his regime will die out naturally then why are we trying to force it with the blockade?
Speaks wonder for how much we care about the welfare of the Cuban people.
Cuba haven't been a threat to us for 40 years.To be objective, as much as we might like to think of ourselves as, "the good guys", no country, certainly not a world power, can survive on high morals alone.
Only in discourse. In his actions he's far closer to the likes of J. D. Perón.Chavez is a Trot.
No, it's no wonder. The US basically annexed Cuba while keeping a friendly overseer/President to oversee the gambling dens and sugar plantations. But, still, that doesn't make Castro's actions right.We took them from Spain and kept them for ourselves and our corporate interests. Ever heard of the Platt Amendment? We consistently backed brutal dictators for the simple reason that it was profitable. Then when they revolted we tried to suppress them(which is so disgustingly hypocritical I don't even want to get into it) via the Bay of Pigs as well as numerous assassination attempts on Castro.
Is it really any wonder why they hate us?
Because right-wing propagandists need a left-wing enemy to fight and slander and viceversa.civver_764 said:If his regime will die out naturally then why are we trying to force it with the blockade?
And Iraq wasn't a threat ebfore Mr. Bush decided to invade it, so what?Cuba haven't been a threat to us for 40 years.
They risked death doing it? Also, how many of such people were there, approximately?
That numbered several hundred out of millions?
Well, it certainly weeded out the ones goony enough to think that Stalinism was better than having to sit on the back of the bus.
I must then respectfully guess the "impression" may be a bit exaggerated.While I have no exact numbers, the impression left is one of many thousands.
Or that they simply didn't know what they were getting into.It was obviously pretty bad for them here if they chose Stalinist (and post-Stalinist) Soviet Union over here!
...its superiority quite clearly demonstrated by the fact it actually enabled its citizens to leave, if they preferred so.Which should give you an idea of just how badly they were treated in our gloriously superior and free country.
I must then respectfully guess the "impression" may be a bit exaggerated.
Or that they simply didn't know what they were getting into.
...its superiority quite clearly demonstrated by the fact it actually enabled its citizens to leave, if they preferred so.
I could say the same of Cubans who came the US, though. Or even of immigrants in general. How many came to the "land of prosperity" expecting streets paved with gold, and found themselves in a tenement working 50 hours a week for miserable pay, worse off than the place they left?.
This explains why we generally vote Republican.![]()
No, you vote Republican because you don't understand the teachings of your own religion.
Castro said:Cuban Model no longer works