Civ4 Warlords - OT game?

Are you interested in playing an OT Warlords multiplayer starting 1st August?


  • Total voters
    99
Status
Not open for further replies.
In any case, I'm inclined to go with Matrix's suggestion that an absolute no-DM be shelved in favor of people making agreements amongst themselves (particularly given a cushion of sorts with the no-DM-with-war-declaration rule in place).

So atm, its expect DMs unless you make an agreement with your enemy not to make DMs?

Until otherwise noted here, yes (unless you're currently at peace).

Well then let me make it public that my "agreement" is that there will be no doublemoves when the war includes myself. So I will not be doing doublemoves and I expect there to be no DMs made against me.
 
I don't care whether double-moves are allowed or not. You all do whatever.
 
The glorious and mighty Comyn Council, with horns blaring and our invincible army creating a thunderous din whilst marching, announces that the liberation of the Persian people is now underway. They cry out for liberty and we have arrived to help them acheive it.
 
Dear all - VRWCAgent is the only player in this game who won't sign open borders with me. Thus I must conclude that, coupled with these latest developments, he is the most agressive player in this game.
 
I tend not to sign open borders as a matter of policy unless it is clearly an advantage for me to do so. We are not an aggressive people. We are peace and freedom loving people who are now only engaged in war to bring this peace and freedom to the Persian Empire.
 
Dear all - VRWCAgent is the only player in this game who won't sign open borders with me. Thus I must conclude that, coupled with these latest developments, he is the most agressive player in this game.

I have my doubts on that one.....
 
We are peace and freedom loving people who are now only engaged in war to bring this peace and freedom to the Persian Empire.

I tought no one chose the Americans :confused:
 
I tend not to sign open borders as a matter of policy unless it is clearly an advantage for me to do so. We are not an aggressive people. We are peace and freedom loving people who are now only engaged in war to bring this peace and freedom to the Persian Empire.
Exactly. I sign open borders for mutual benifit and trade. You do so only when it works for almost exclusively for you. Hence aggresive.
 
I tought no one chose the Americans :confused:

I know not these "Americans" of whom you speak, but I assure you, the Persians shall have peace, or rest in peace. They shall have the freedom to send their tribute to the Comyn Council every year on demand.
 
Exactly. I sign open borders for mutual benifit and trade. You do so only when it works for almost exclusively for you. Hence aggresive.

Let's see... Do you have a religion to spread?

Does VRWC?
 
Our people, at this moment in our history, are content to worship we of the Comyn Council. We strive to remain worthy of this deification.
 
If he wants to build temples or monastery's then he needs a religion to spread there. Unless he's goign after Taosim again:lol: :mischief:

Right, my point is that preferring to remain clear of a neighbor's religion is sufficient reason to not sign an open borders agreement, and isn't necessarily hostile.

I'm still wondering how (or more to the point, why) Matrix infected one of my cities with Christianity...
 
Your also about to raze one of his cities from the looks of it.

nope letting it grow, calculations are right should be soon enough :)

why want to make a trade for it?

edit- also folks religion does spread by chance to any cities without one already in it
 
Sorry I had to turn over my civ...looks like things got interesting. I had some medical issues and some time issues which forced me to give up some things and thsi was one of them.

ID...PM me if you need a sub OR if I can have a look see at whats happening.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom