Civ4 Warlords - OT game?

Are you interested in playing an OT Warlords multiplayer starting 1st August?


  • Total voters
    99
Status
Not open for further replies.
Demanding Yoke and a tech. And do look at the date of my post BCLG, I posted that on the 15th. Today is the 17th. You probably made the demand on the 14th. 3 days ago.
 
For the next two weeks Kemal will have control over Straland, while I'm in South Africa. He's been informed and instructed, so it should all work out well. ;)
 
On a side note, can anyone else see the food graph on the histogram? i havn't been able to the entire game
 
We Japanese have no Proof That those BCLG People even exist.
 
No you simply cannot do that, its against the fundamental laws of MP games, to be frank if this is allowed to carry on i will stop playing the game.

The story is that i declared war on davo, took one city on the original turn, after that davo gifted all of his cities to sparta who accepted them, the sparta who had originally agreed to help me take davo out.

You cannot gift cities to other people which will be taken by an opposing force just because you are going to lose them.

here is the proofs
50446071jo0.jpg

96229293pi7.jpg


This city here-
90716353cw3.jpg


is maybe the only city he should be allowed to gift but even then he should not be allowed too as it would only be about 8-10 turns before i took that one also.

This may just appear to be me being petty, i do not mean it to come across like that however it is simply unsportsmanship.

the only two alternatives to solve this would be to roll the turn back or for sparta to delete the units in the cities and gift them to me.
 
I've taken the game down pending the resolution of this...

Edit: And I've asked Whomp in his capacity as referee-on-demand to assist, since I'm allied with one of the parties here.

Rules here in case anyone is looking.
 
No one told me it was illegal. Serves BCLG right for declaring war on me. I did tell him I wasn't very happy with his demands. Everyone knows me and Sparta were on friendly terms what with our war on Bazza. If it's illegal then declare the other OT game void as the LAOD traded cities and units constantly.

If BCLG wants to talk about unsportmanship then unsportmanship to build up huge alliances with bully tatics. He's just crying because i'm ruining his chance to win the game, which serves him right for declaring on me anways.

If this is dememed illegal then I would like to motion that the gifting of techs to BCLG earlier in the game when he was bottom of the table because he kept not taking turns to be illegal and unsporstmanly.
 
Not only whomp i do ask others in the game or even lurkers to voice their opinion on this, do you think that it is right to do this?
 
11- If you suspect that a tactic qualifies as an exploit, or think that it might be called unfair, post it in this thread for group decision earlier rather than later. Remember, we're trying to stay newbie-friendly.
Since there's precedence in the MTDG it appears this move was clearly an exploit in my view. The cities that were under siege should be given to BCLG and the others should be given back to Davo.

Davo-- I hope you kept your units by moving out of those cities.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom