PhoenicianGold
Emperor
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2018
- Messages
- 1,828
It makes sense, sumer is the baseplate: the civ to learn in, the civ to understand the game with, because it was, in essence, ‘the first civ’
was it poorly designed when it comes to sumer? perhaps, but not necessarily terribly so—in my mind, it’s not that it isn’t representative of sumer, it’s just not the best representative of sumer. There were better leader choices than Gilgamesh, but Gilga is definitely the best known, and he’s undoubtedly a big personality and at least we know he existed.
That's precisely my thought. I think Egypt was sacrificed in the same way for the sake of game design. And I don't mind that a few well-known areas of history are perverted a bit more for the sake of fun. Kind of like how fantasy novels, although referencing history, aren't expected to be totally historically inaccurate; their references draw attention to themselves and encourage conversation about the real history which inspired them. Nothing is exactly "misrepresented" as long as most people are aware that creative liberties were taken and there's a wealth of historical information to explore behind it.
As one of my favorite historical figures, I’m a bit disappointed that Cyrus was portrayed the way he was. He shouldn’t be a scheming, devious guy, which feels like they designed him around the Massagatae myths about him, for the sake of building an in-game meta with him and Tomyris. He was a kind, benevolent leader, a powerful conquerer but a even better administrator. The Satrapy system was invented by him, and he freed the jewish people from enslavement in Babylon. He was noted for his religious and cultural acceptance and skill in incorporating new land and keeping it peaceful. He’s without a doubt the best leader to represent Achaemenid Persia in my mind, and alongside Khosrow II, the best to represent pre-islamic Persia as a whole.
I was disappointed as well. The Tomyris legend is cute but ultimately a pretty small part of history and I would prefer it have been restricted to how the Scythian civ is portrayed, not to bleed over into other civs with much longer and deeper histories.
also, i doubt the devs have even heard of the kushans. I don’t think they’re even a possibility at the present moment. Maybe if we get a well-done popular mod for them, but atm, we are not getting them
I think there is a very good chance we will get a civ occupying Afghanistan/Pakistan/Uzbekistan. And since I am not completely confident it will be the Timurids (although I think that Timur is such a prominent historical figure he might carry them into existence like Alexander and Bolivar), I am open to the possibilty that the devs choose a different civ to occupy the area like the Kushans or the Durrani. So the Kushans really only managed to move out of "unlikely" by virtue of occupying highly desirable real estate.