The Iranian roster is really getting interesting here (as there is now a possibility of Sasanians facing the Abbasids and the Ottomans in the same Age - which I am not really a fan of).
The Iranian roster is really getting interesting here (as there is now a possibility of Sasanians facing the Abbasids and the Ottomans in the same Age - which I am not really a fan of).
We have quite full line in exploration:
Byzantines & Sassanians > Rashidun > Umayyads > Abbasids (playable) > Seljuks & Khwarazmians > Mongols (playable) > Ottomans
We are missing just the Ayyubids, Mameluks and Safavids here pratically (maybe Buyids too if you want to be really pedantic)
Well, what a day huh? So the updates;
First the pedantic ones: the names Civ7 uses for the peoples of Chan Chan and Istakhr are actually Chimú and Sassanian respectively instead of Chimor and Sassanid...
Now the new things: Tenochtitlan of the Mexica People (Exploration)
Kumasi of the Ashanti People (Modern)
Muscat of the Omani People (Modern)
Lisbon of the Portuguese People? (Modern) Aaní of the Tlingit People? (Modern) Manhattan Project Wonder (Modern) Bermuda Triangle Natural Wonder (free post-launch update) Mount Everest Natural Wonder (free post-launch update)
Pinging @bite again here, beyond this there the leaked stulff from Right to Rule Pack that is everywhere on the forum that you gonna need to update
We didn't see how that wonder is named in the English loc., at least if that happened I'm not aware of. But I did saw it in, I think it was Spanish? I'm not sure now because that was a while back, that name used there was "Bell of Seongdeok" when translated
Could it be? I can finally start refering to the Aztecs by the proper name Mexica, and people will get what I'm talking about? It's really giving me hope that when we get the Mexica, It will be a properly researched civ and not just "here take a ballcourt"
We didn't see how that wonder is named in the English loc., at least if that happened I'm not aware of. But I did saw it in, I think it was Spanish? I'm not sure now because that was a while back, that name used there was "Bell of Seongdeok" when translated
Could it be? I can finally start refering to the Aztecs by the proper name Mexica, and people will get what I'm talking about? It's really giving me hope that when we get the Mexica, It will be a properly researched civ and not just "here take a ballcourt"
We didn't see how that wonder is named in the English loc., at least if that happened I'm not aware of. But I did saw it in, I think it was Spanish? I'm not sure now because that was a while back, that name used there was "Bell of Seongdeok" when translated
hahaha touche, poor ballcourt just gets pinponged between Maya and Aztecs. I wish they just made whatever arena district art they get ballcourt shaped instead.
OR
make Chichen Itza's great ballcourt a wonder....just throwing that out there Firaxis, just google it look at the size of that thing.
hahaha touche, poor ballcourt just gets pinponged between Maya and Aztecs. I wish they just made whatever arena district art they get ballcourt shaped instead.
OR
make Chichen Itza's great ballcourt a wonder....just throwing that out there Firaxis, just google it look at the size of that thing.
Well, what a day huh? So the updates;
First the pedantic ones: the names Civ7 uses for the peoples of Chan Chan and Istakhr are actually Chimú and Sassanian respectively instead of Chimor and Sassanid...
Now the new things: Tenochtitlan of the Mexica People (Exploration) Kumasi of the Ashanti People (Modern) Muscat of the Omani People (Modern) Lisbon of the Portuguese People? (Modern) Aaní of the Tlingit People? (Modern) Manhattan Project Wonder (Modern) Bermuda Triangle Natural Wonder (free post-launch update) Mount Everest Natural Wonder (free post-launch update)
Pinging @bite again here, beyond this there the leaked stulff from Right to Rule Pack that is everywhere on the forum that you gonna need to update
Southern hemisphere land (not counting Antarctica with no humans) 34 mill km2
Northern hemisphere land 102 mill km2
So you'd expect no more than 25% from the Southern hemisphere anyways
And since most of it was varying degrees of disconnected from the rest of the world (South America only connected to the Americas, Australia with little contact and Southern Africa separated just by distance)... they didn't get remembered as much
Southern hemisphere land (not counting Antarctica with no humans) 34 mill km2
Northern hemisphere land 102 mill km2
So you'd expect no more than 25% from the Southern hemisphere anyways
And since most of it was varying degrees of disconnected from the rest of the world (South America only connected to the Americas, Australia with little contact and Southern Africa separated just by distance)... they didn't get remembered as much
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.