What I did exactly: all the desert tiles were turned into plains, corn spawns in 1600 AD near Caricyn/Astrakhan, silk spawns around 1100 AD near Astrakhan, I've added a flood plain on the delta at the Caspian Sea, and a couple more grass tiles on the Black Sea coast.
Current (SVN) development discussion thread
- Thread starter Leoreth
- Start date
Akbarthegreat
Angel of Junil
Strangely, the usersettings file had it, but it wasn't there in the bug setting in-game. But I'll fix that.
Thanks.
Workers workers workers! Russian strategy: Catch iron ASAP, upgrade 3 horse archers to knight, rob workers from Byz and Franks - and conquer Marseilles before Rome! By pillaging iron and cease fire, you can gradually get all France.
Sanguivorant
Submitter
Are there other plans you have regarding any map changes?
Tigranes
Armenian
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2008
- Messages
- 10,411
While we are on Russia, can we somehow balance Kiev vs Moscow food situation? Kiev has 4 major food resources, Moscow has 2 Minor(Cows). Kiev grows size 20+, Moscow gets stack at 11-12.
Do we get any penalty for Palace transfers? I built one in St. Petersburg but my stability did not change much.
So Poland never gets a city, period?
Do we get any penalty for Palace transfers? I built one in St. Petersburg but my stability did not change much.
So Poland never gets a city, period?
I think I will add Wilno as a second Polish city in the 1700 AD scenario.
Good point, I'll take a look at that.
Moving your palace can trigger a stability check, but doesn't give a penalty. I think if you move it inside of your core even that doesn't happen.
What is that in reply to?
adhiraj.bose
Deity
Instead of changing the Mughal Core, why not just beef up Persia ? the Qizilbashis feel like an antiquated unit when Persia respawns in 1500 AD . By this time most armies in its vicinity would be building muskets and bombards. To make this UU relevant I would suggest giving some kind of a bonus against gunpowder units *( does it have that already ? In one scenario I creamed through Mughal Muskets with Qizilbashis ) .
The Mughals were ethnically Central Asian and NOT indian. This fact should be respected. Afghanistan has been historically and culturally part of both India and Persia. This shouldn't be forgotten either.
The Mughals were ethnically Central Asian and NOT indian. This fact should be respected. Afghanistan has been historically and culturally part of both India and Persia. This shouldn't be forgotten either.
Qizilbashis are already as Musketman replacement. And it has nothing to do with Iranian strength in general, as the Mughals usually expand into Persia and even Mesopotamia by the Thai or Congolese spawns, i.e. well before Iran is resurrected.
Herat isn't even historically associated with the Sultanate of Delhi or the Mughal Empire anyways. Just representing some historical control that was already irrelevant when the Sultanate of Delhi was at its height isn't worth the much more major ahistorical consequences of it.
Herat isn't even historically associated with the Sultanate of Delhi or the Mughal Empire anyways. Just representing some historical control that was already irrelevant when the Sultanate of Delhi was at its height isn't worth the much more major ahistorical consequences of it.
AtlantaMarty
No longer active
Wilno is to close to Koenigsberg - Minsk is a better idea. But thanks for adding a second city!
Could you please also add Lwow?
Didn't you suspect that this is caused by Mughal war with Seljuk? These areas aren't properly defended anyway and especially after Seljuk collapse, it usually becomes Independent until Iranian spawn unless Ottoman conquer it.
soul-breathing
Emperor
The civic Standing Army has bug in recent svn, new land unit without +2 exps.
And generally it's too easy for AI to collapse. It makes Russian 3rd UHV almost impossible(I play in Monarch). When you attack a civ till it becomes your vassal, next you declare war to another civ, then your vassal will be collapsed, almost every time, especially for China, Korea, Iran and some other civs.
And generally it's too easy for AI to collapse. It makes Russian 3rd UHV almost impossible(I play in Monarch). When you attack a civ till it becomes your vassal, next you declare war to another civ, then your vassal will be collapsed, almost every time, especially for China, Korea, Iran and some other civs.
Collapse is definitely too easy... I think I'm yet to see Spain survive the revolutions in Latin America. Admittedly, I don't play late game very often, but even the early game suffers: the ancient empires (Persia, Greece, Rome) collapse if they get even close to their real size, and taking one city from a neighbouring nation is all too often enough to collapse them. Or me, rather unfortunately. The stability system just seems too harsh. All that matters for the human anymore is expansion stability.
strijder20
Wallowing in irony
Exactly, I have the same problem. Although I think that particular UHV condition is trouble-some gameplaywise with the unpolished diplomacy system we have, although it is definitely original.
Can you be more specific? All land units?
soul-breathing
Emperor
Yes, all land units
I have try it with America and Brazil, city has barrack while adopting Standing Army, but new land units only have 3 exps.
