Wow, interesting. So is the implication here that it's impossible to really say where my ancestry lies? If during each generation essentially 50% of all data is lost, then it seems to me that if you go back 5 generations the data is so-so, if you go back 8 generations it's even less accurate, etc. Is that about right?
Well, as you go back in the generations, more and more of the data has been lost, but there was also more data there to begin with. If a large part of that data was 'Polish', then the data remains. However, yes, if you had exactly one great-great-great-great-great-grandmother who was a native American, her data is either still there (and overrepresented!), or it was lost at some point and is underrepresented.
Oh, awesome. This means you could do 23&me and get way more out of it than others, to your long-term benefit.
Research Article
Misperceiving Bullpoop as Profound Is Associated with Favorable Views of Cruz, Rubio, Trump and Conservatism
Stefan Pfattheicher ,
Simon Schindler
PLOS
Published: April 29, 2016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153419
Abstract
The present research investigates the associations between holding favorable views of potential Democratic or Republican candidates for the US presidency 2016 and seeing profoundness in bullpoop statements. In this contribution, bullpoop is used as a technical term which is defined as communicative expression that lacks content, logic, or truth from the perspective of natural science. We used the Bullpoop Receptivity scale (BSR) to measure seeing profoundness in bullpoop statements. The BSR scale contains statements that have a correct syntactic structure and seem to be sound and meaningful on first reading but are actually vacuous. Participants (N = 196; obtained via Amazon Mechanical Turk) rated the profoundness of bullpoop statements (using the BSR) and provided favorability ratings of three Democratic (Hillary Clinton, Martin OMalley, and Bernie Sanders) and three Republican candidates for US president (Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Donald Trump). Participants also completed a measure of political liberalism/conservatism. Results revealed that favorable views of all three Republican candidates were positively related to judging bullpoop statements as profound. The smallest correlation was found for Donald Trump. Although we observe a positive association between bullpoop and support for the three Democrat candidates, this relationship is both substantively small and statistically insignificant. The general measure of political liberalism/conservatism was also related to judging bullpoop statements as profound in that individuals who were more politically conservative had a higher tendency to see profoundness in bullpoop statements. Of note, these results were not due to a general tendency among conservatives to see profoundness in everything: Favorable views of Republican candidates and conservatism were not significantly related to profoundness ratings of mundane statements. In contrast, this was the case for Hillary Clinton and Martin OMalley. Overall, small-to-medium sized correlations were found, indicating that far from all conservatives see profoundness in bullpoop statements.
This isn't really true in London (and by extension the UK).The correlation that a lot of people might miss: new homes are built by the 10%. So yeah, they're getting bigger, because the 10% hasn't had their incomes decouple from growth. And it's those new homes that are placed on the 2ndary market, and prices are going to be sticky downwards.
The old houses that are being phased out due to age are the smaller ones, 'cause houses were smaller back then. It's a neat tidbit. If you're a part of the 10% and want to help reverse the hollowing of the middle class, when you build your dreamhome, build it small and efficient. Spend your money in other ways.
Yeah, I think it's more a phenomenon of the Land of the Suburbs that I live in.
I hate it. Melbourne is lovely, but it is not a city. It is a hub of parks and high rises stuck amid a wasteland of suburbs. It is veritably hateful.
On the flip side, its middle class carpenters, masons, electricians and plumbers who build those massive statements of shallow look at me boxes of vanity for the 2%, 1%, whatever. Its the lower class guys working in the building supply places who sell the materials to the contractors, and their middle class managers who make sure they do a good job. True, the owners of building centers tend to be the 1% sort who try to cut the work hours while driving their people ever harder to get the same work done, but there are a lot of regular guys making dough off of the mansions of the filthy rich. I always used to enjoy getting work from one of these, and charging them a bit extra. I suppose its the same as we foreigners get in the Philippines, the foreigner prices.Life goes on.