[RD] Daily Graphs and Charts

Status
Not open for further replies.
The closer to the x axis the less energy used per person which is better.


What I am wondering is what the low density Australia cities are so much more efficient than the USians.


I'll guess here that it's a combination of less winter heating, less summer air conditioning, smaller and more efficient cars, and better public transit. @Arwon for more info.


I'm surprised the New York density is so low. So I'm assuming they're using statistical metropolitan area, and not the city itself.

NYC is over 27,000 people per square mile. NYC metro area is only under 1,800 people per square mile. The difference being you get to both some places that tend to have very large housing on large estates with people who use a lot of large private vehicles. But you also get to places that are within that metro area, but are borderline rural.
 
So in general the less dense a city is the more energy it takes for transport. Makes sense. American cities were all built for cars too, for the most part, not for pedestrians or public transport. We love our transportation autonomy.

The top tax rate graph isn't very meaningful to be honest. It doesn't tell you if the system is overall progressive or regressive since you don't see the total tax burdens.
 
I'll guess here that it's a combination of less winter heating, less summer air conditioning, smaller and more efficient cars, and better public transit. @Arwon for more info.


I'm surprised the New York density is so low. So I'm assuming they're using statistical metropolitan area, and not the city itself.

NYC is over 27,000 people per square mile. NYC metro area is only under 1,800 people per square mile. The difference being you get to both some places that tend to have very large housing on large estates with people who use a lot of large private vehicles. But you also get to places that are within that metro area, but are borderline rural.

Presumably because we don't drive those giant jeep and van vehicles, and use slightly more public transit
 
Schermopname (2816).png
 
They should build apartment blocks but with niches for urns rather than apartments. It's how we build cemeteries here, except the holes are for coffins.
 
They should build apartment blocks but with niches for urns rather than apartments. It's how we build cemeteries here, except the holes are for coffins.

Picking up your thought

In Hong Kong you would expect a modern and big underground warehouse system that picks up the urn or urns of your family when you visit the above ground location you paid for to visit (big or small, etc) with your family urns shown there during your paid visit time.
 
From the excellent Charting Transport.

au-eu-ca-nz-population-weighted-density.png


Population-weighted density in some cities in Europe, Canada, Australia and NZ. These are all based on 1km grids and the density weighted by population (ie, zero population squares like water and parks aren't included, and low density rural areas don't count much because of low populations. Also useful to see the densities at which people live:

au-eu-ca-nz-urban-density-distribution.png
 
Cool. I always knew we was more denser.
 

Every thriving economy tneeds a good infrastructure starting with roads !
Many roads !
What also would be interesting is how China organises the "small roads", the way they envision to handle with their plan-economical approach the Urban-Rural divide, that is now a real problem in the developed EU countries and the US.
With the Chinese obedience system they can for sure surpress the political effects of a poorer, less faciliated rural population, but the basic factors, issues, are the same. You are screwed living rural (unless you are retired).
 
Dont get it. Is the map suggesting that it is wrong to build roads in the green areas???
The relevant bit of the article is:
Nature said:
One of the strongest concerns in BRI countries is about the environmental impacts of the projects, which are transforming the landscape in dozens of nations. The conservation group WWF reports that the main BRI connections between Asia and Europe cross through 1,739 areas that have been identified as important for biodiversity conservation, affecting 265 threatened species, including 81 endangered species such as the saiga antelope (Saiga tatarica), tigers (Panthera tigris) and giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca).

One project that has environmentalists worried is a planned 350-kilometre, $3.8-billion Hungary-to-Serbia railway. This has also attracted the attention of EU authorities and is still awaiting regulatory approval. In addition, China has not ratified the Espoo Convention, which requires member states to assess the environmental and health impacts of development projects at an early stage.

Pervez Hoodbhoy, a physicist at Forman Christian College in Lahore, Pakistan, says that few — if any — of China’s scientific collaborations are evaluating the environmental impacts of BRI infrastructure projects. “There’s a real lack of research on a regulatory framework for the BRI projects themselves and this leads to the rest of us having to make guesses as to what is happening and what the impacts might be,” he says. “There needs to be research on these questions, too,” says Hoodbhoy. “Without environmental safeguards in place, there are risks of exacerbating environmental problems, putting pressure on dwindling natural resources and displacing communities,” agrees Aban Marker Kabraji, Asia director at the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) in Bangkok.
 
The relevant bit of the article is:

I am no expert on all that bio-diversity related to roads and urbanisation.
But there are enough of them here in NL that "forced" eco-passages as solution to prevent eco-areas getting disconnected by the eco-walls of roads and railways.
The first picture normal one, where the eco-bridge is higher than the motorway.
The second picture (under construction) where a waterway eco connection between eco-areas is rescued, which needs the motorway to go lower in a short tunnel (needing pumps in our watery country).
Schermopname (2867).png
Schermopname (2869).png


It is all a matter of money.

My remark on those "small roads" in my earlier post.

The worst thing you can do for nature and bio-diversity is a heapless unstructured urbanisation.
Compact cities within larger untouched areas are much better than a scattering of roads and houses at less density covering big surfaces.

It is obvious that economical activities will emerge around those logistic connections.
The way the urbanisation and "small roads" will be handled to both sides of those big roads, motorways and railways, is going to determine whether these big roads become indeed eco-walls.
If that urbanisation is done intermittent along the big roads and enough eco-passages are made as well, I do not believe biodiversity will suffer.
 

The this map is one of the most hilariously anglolusional things possible.

The UK and the US can't have a railroad.

The UK and US are incable of having - a thing - that would pass - as a railroad - in France or Japan or Korea or Djermany.

And they're trying. It's not like they're not trying.
In fact in California they're spending billions of dollars on the not having of the railroad.

(Meanwhile you folks are phantasizing about how Elon Musk is going to build the hyperloop with the power of his macho balls, how there'll be a Schrödinger's border in Ireland - because "technology" exists are you guys are just effin brilliant with it.

And Margot James is going to get the internet all cleaned up. And maybe there's gonna be legislation so there'll only be knives with dull tips in the UK going forward...
Because clearly the knives are the problem. Mysterious how all them pointy-knife-countries cope.)

But that's not the problem with the BRI.
The real problem is - *drumroll* - biodiversity!
Moderator Action: Adult content redacted

That map is ten out of ten max baizuo.

And no, you guys don't get to counter with that argument.
You have stumbled. And you have seriously swallowed too much gum.
Too much gum!

Moderator Action: I don't know what you were trying to prove here, but this kind of post is unacceptable here at CFC. Kindly tone down the adult material, k? --LM
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Who is pro-life again?
maternal_mortality-png.525318

neonatal_mortality-png.525320

From Wired.
 

Attachments

  • maternal_mortality.png
    maternal_mortality.png
    31.3 KB · Views: 313
  • neonatal_mortality.png
    neonatal_mortality.png
    33.8 KB · Views: 314
00121c7e-614.jpg

Exit poll for today's Euro elections in my constituency. The greens are doing surprisingly well in all three constituencies.

I voted green - my wife knows the candidate and she performed well in debates calling out Casey. I am disappointed the last candidate listed has done so well. I really dislike her.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom