[RD] Daily Graphs and Charts

Status
Not open for further replies.
That was the joke I was trying to make. :D

In reality Mise walked ~300 km in April. (It's easy to confuse 300 and 3000 km, since 100 cm = m, but 1000 m = km).
 
Spoiler :
2016heatmap.png
 
^Isn't that map just a 'this is my politics' one? I mean... Ukraine is more stable than Russia? Ok. Not sure why Britain is 'stable' now either. It basically looks like a set stereotype map.

Lol at super-mighty Finland too :)
 
That was the joke I was trying to make. :D

In reality Mise walked ~300 km in April. (It's easy to confuse 300 and 3000 km, since 100 cm = m, but 1000 m = km).
Man, I really can't do basic maths anymore. Excel has ruined me!
 
You mean that your maths is now Excellent? :p
 
Finland #1!

Man, I really can't do basic maths anymore. Excel has ruined me!

That's why I do all the possible maths in my head. I also avoid using tables or anything like that. For example, I've lately calculated the integral of (essentially) 1/sqrt(1+x^2) many times over by substitution, even though I could've just checked my previous calculations. I take it as an exercise that slows down dementia.

Anyhow, it doesn't prevent doing stupid mistakes. I do them all the time. It's especially easy if you're expecting the result, like in this case.

To keep it on-topic, here's a chart of the viewers of GoT:
1510e5eabc47d3dd380ad2389e189676.png
 
I wonder why 'Cretaceous' has been abbreviated to 'K'.
 
I'm well aware of that. Sir Isaac Newton wrote the Principia Mathematica in Latin, after all.

I was more commenting on using apparently foreign abbreviations when writing the legend in English.
 
I'm well aware of that. Sir Isaac Newton wrote the Principia Mathematica in Latin, after all.

I was more commenting on using apparently foreign abbreviations when writing the legend in English.

I suppose it's convention. C is already used for the Carboniferous era.
 
Well, Wikipedia agrees with you. 'K' is used because kreide is the German word for chalk, presumably derived from the Latin word creta.
 

Crudely speaking, then, critics either love a film or hate it - there's only one outside the 'love' band between 100% and 85% and the 'hate' band between 10% and about 35%.

Well, it is possible for a film to have a 100% Tomatometer score if every critic agreed thwt the movie is mediocre but OK, deserving of a 6/10, whereas if all critics agreed on a 5.9 score, the film would have a 0% Tomatometer. So, the Tomatometer is more a measure of consensus on whether a film is better or worse than 'average', so to speak, than a measure of overall quality. This means that you can have a universally mediocre film with a very high tomatometer but a low aggregated score side by side with a divisive film that drws more praise from those who love it than derision from those who hate it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom