Mango Elephant
Deity
No, it's a religious ceremony
Obviously it's not just that if the government is in marriage. Seperation of Church and State. Marriage may be a religious ceremony, but it is certainly a governmental institution as well.
No, it's a religious ceremony
Separation of Church and State is why I support everyone getting civil unions and justly returning marriage to religious institutions
Just a hint, but maybe, just maybe, you may want to rethink referring to the majority of people in the USA as 'them bigots'....because honestly, doing so isnt really helping you out that much, if at all. In fact, I would think such polarization does more against it than for it.
But hey, I am just a reasonable guy, what do I know.
Mob counts resonable "moderate" conservative these days. Its true.
Not a big deal really. Were far from the days where "divorce" triggered a schism of the Church and several wars.
Like the whole rage at "stem cell research" seems like your vainly swimming against history and advancement of civlisation.
Eventually like divorce it'll become acceptable and well look back and wonder why it was such a contencious issue.
I'd be interested to know if anyone can provide a good argument against gay marriage without referencing religion.
I'd be interested to know if anyone can provide a good argument against gay marriage without referencing religion.

marriage is a religious institution thus saying gay marriage references religion so you can't make a good argument for gay marriage without referencing religion either, congratulations on checkmating yourself though
![]()
I think only the state of California is able to appeal further (and I doubt it is eager to do so, much like Obama's DoJ with the Massachusetts DOMA case), and not the crazies that were saddled with defending Prop 8 here (because Arnold/Jerry Brown wanted nothing to do with it), so isn't it settled? Every article, CNN, etc. states otherwise, and it ending up in the Supreme Court is apparently a foregone conclusion, so I must be missing something.
I would contest that assertion- I see marriage as a social and legal institution first and foremost, and the religious associations simply reflect the human tendency to tie religion to any major event in their lives. Remember, most of these institutions, in their basic forms, date back to a pre-Abrahamic era, when the line between religious and secular life was far less well defined, and the modern concept of secular life simply didn't really exist, so the fact that Christianity later usurped paganism as the associated religion does not at all imply that it also usurped the more ancient secular aspects of marriage.marriage is a religious institution thus saying gay marriage references religion so you can't make a good argument for gay marriage without referencing religion either, congratulations on checkmating yourself though
![]()
Are Christmas and Easter therefor not religious matters?Just because you beleive marriage should be a religious institution doesn't mean it is - hence the reason Athiests marry all the time.
Are Christmas and Easter therefor not religious matters?

Are Christmas and Easter therefor not religious matters?
PERIOD.I'd be interested to know if anyone can provide a good argument against gay marriage