Define Religon

Atheism can be defined as faith in the "fact" that there is no God.

That makes it religion enough for me.

No, it's defined as a lack of faith in God.

Faith that God doesn't exist is a subset of atheism, but doesn't define all of it. Even so, it would be hard to argue that strong atheism is a religion.. There are no prophets, no rituals, no common dogma, no common beliefs about the nature of reality, etc.

bathsheba666 said:
Atheists cannot prove God does not exist...

Therefore it's a matter of faith.

I can't prove that Santa Claus doesn't exist either, and I wouldn't call that faith.
 
Atheism is not a religion.

Assume Atheism is a religion
=>
Atheist people are religious

Contradiction here, after the first deduction!
 
Faith in a 'fact' does not a religion make. Stupid order of words in a sentence does not wisdom make. (sorry :p)

Does me having faith in the 'fact' my car is at the parkinglot make me religious?
 
Difference, Ziggy, difference. The car can be proven to be at the parking lot, in more ways than pure logic. Atheism, on the other hand, is a logical deduction, and cannot be physically proven.
 
Difference, Ziggy, difference. The car can be proven to be at the parking lot, in more ways than pure logic. Atheism, on the other hand, is a logical deduction, and cannot be physically proven.

Atheism isn't even a lifestyle, though, like most religions are. Atheists tend to follow the secular customs of their own country, not follow one particular "atheist" movement. That's where the idea that "atheism is a religion" breaks down - you'd have better luck quantifying secular humanism as a religion, but I doubt you'd even make that work.
 
Atheism isn't even a lifestyle, though, like most religions are. Atheists tend to follow the secular customs of their own country, not follow one particular "atheist" movement. That's where the idea that "atheism is a religion" breaks down - you'd have better luck quantifying secular humanism as a religion, but I doubt you'd even make that work.

The word most implies exception. Atheism can be regarded as one of these exceptions. Also, I know many people that consider themselves "Christian", but not one of them follow any kind of ritual. (Apart from Christmas and Easter, which we discount)
 
I can't prove that Santa Claus doesn't exist either, and I wouldn't call that faith.

But I assume you get presents every year, more often than miracles.
So it's hardly a valid comparison.

Though, from my particular perspective, your comment puts it all in a delightful context.
 
I am religious and don't classify atheism in itself as a religion. However, atheists may follow ideologies that themselves bear close resemblance to religion (such as secular humanism, or some forms of communism, or even UU).
 
How is atheism a logical deduction?

When the premise says -"I don't have belief that there is a God,therefore I am incline to believe in the doctrine of..."
 
Difference, Ziggy, difference. The car can be proven to be at the parking lot, in more ways than pure logic. Atheism, on the other hand, is a logical deduction, and cannot be physically proven.

You can't prove a negative.

Is believing that an invisible unicorn doesn't exist in my pants a religion just because you can't prove it false?
 
Back
Top Bottom