Election from hell

Who do you vote for? Read scenario first, plus response to Tim (post #4)

  • Hitler

    Votes: 3 7.7%
  • Mussolini

    Votes: 15 38.5%
  • Nader

    Votes: 18 46.2%
  • Abstain/blank

    Votes: 3 7.7%

  • Total voters
    39
Apparently, some people would rather have Hitler than SJWs, imagine that. No, actually I don't have to. Supposedly that explains to some extent why some people voted Trump.
 
Eh, regardless of what (frivolous) motivations you might have for posting them, your posts give voice to sentiments that I've seen in this forum that may be behind the Hitler votes here.
 
You keep digging that hole...
 
Digging holes is fun, you should try it some time. You can find all kinds of neat stuff like grubs and rocks and earthworms and if you dig deep enough you might even find china and if you dig even deeper you might even find a traces of the American political system's credibility.
 
Digging holes is fun, you should try it some time.
SJW do it constantly, the difference is that they seem to never notice it.

BTW, I'm still scratching my head at what people manage to extract from this poll. What I get from it is :

People voting Mussolini are taking the pragmatic route.
People voting Nader are taking the idealistic route.
People voting Hitler are trolling.

Plus maybe a bit of "I actually agree with him" in Mussolini and Hitler votes, but that's most probably just a tiny minority.
Don't really see what's more to deduce from this.
 
SJW do it constantly, the difference is that they seem to never notice it.

BTW, I'm still scratching my head at what people manage to extract from this poll. What I get from it is :

People voting Mussolini are taking the pragmatic route.
People voting Nader are taking the idealistic route.
People voting Hitler are trolling.

Plus maybe a bit of "I actually agree with him" in Mussolini and Hitler votes, but that's most probably just a tiny minority.
Don't really see what's more to deduce from this.

Maybe that the ratio of pragmatists to idealists is roughly 1:1?
 
Ralph Nader has never taken office. For all we know, he might be waiting all his life for the opportunity to press the doomsday button.
 
And you know that Mussolini is also bad and differs much more in degree than in kind from Hitler - he'll probably just install a garden-variety authoritarian state, stir nationalist sentiment, and invade Ethiopia or something. He'll say anti-Semitic things or racist things when it suits him, and not when it doesn't. Total death toll will probably be in the thousands to tens of thousands, not counting the Ethiopians.

What are you talking about? It's well known, at least in certain civ forums, that spearmen can defeat tanks!

Edit: I vote that Ethiopia... or should we say Abyssinia instead?... will win the war against bombers and tanks with it's spears and archers, and correspondingly defect there.

:spear:
 
Last edited:
My serious answer is Nader. Tyranny is tyranny. The upshot is I'm less likely to be killed when Hitler purges the Mussolini men or vice-versa.
 
common national dream of things being "neat and clean and conveniently arranged in groups of ten" ...
Ahhhhahahaha neat and tidy and arranged conveniently in groups of 10 that's the most German/euro thing I've ever read I lost it here
 
Don't remember enough about Nader, but only he or abstaining/other/blank are reasonable choices.

I will not show support for the others. If it's so much a farce that a rational vote is "wasted", why am I contributing to the farce? In the interest of self-preservation I might not advertise my choice in such a world though.
 
*panic*
Oh, no! You're doing it wrong. It's a quote.
It's Stottlemeyer.
Ahahhhhhhh I'm doing it wrong hahaha this is perfect
 
Back
Top Bottom