Emma Watson (Hermione in Harry Potter) Gets a CGI cup size breast increase.

[woody60707]

So Emma Watson (Hermione in Harry Potter) Gets a CGI cup size breast increase in an IMAX poster. Is this wrong?

At 1st I saw nothing wrong with this. There is nothing evil about sex, sex is great (great or greatest?) But then my friend brought up a very good point, "adults should not make money off the selling of sexual of minors"

Now i am very liberal about sex. look a 16yr having sex with a 21yr isn't rape. (gasp! girls like sex too ) I use this to point out how Liberal I am with sex and sexual topics. But there is a line for everything, and selling the sexual of an underage girl(or boy) is crossing that line, even in a minor case like that. and I agree, this is mild.

And yes, I do feel like a hypocrite for saying this. So i hope someone comes up with a logic reason why i am wrong.
http://www.adrants.com/2007/05/emma-watson-gets-breast-augmentation-for-.php

Note: Art movies such as Kids are ok to me as it is an Art film on underage sex. But really, art has nothing to do with this.

 

[warpus]

This is not new; everything gets photoshopped nowadays to make it 'sexier' and more appealing, from fashion magazine covers, to movie posters.

I don't like it, but we should be used to this by now. Sex sells. She's 17.. if she was 14 or 15 then IMO it would be "weird".

 

[Gilder]

So? She probably okayed it, and if she didn't, she probably found iy a pleasent surprise.

 

[Kozmos]

I must be losing my touch....but they dont seem any bigger.

 

[Abaddon]

love it, remember, sex sells kids!

 

[Yuri2356]

I must be losing my touch....but they dont seem any bigger.

And if they are, they're not really that impressive.

 

[Kozmos]

love it, remember, sex sells kids!

or is the other way around? kids sell sex?

 

[BCLG100]

I must be losing my touch....but they dont seem any bigger.

perhaps its the lack of touch influencing the decision?

 

[Phlegmak]

The increasing of her minor boob size was completely unnecessary.

 

[Azash]

Whoa, shocker. Next you'll tell me fashion models are underweight?

 

[amadeus]

I couldn't tell the difference until I superimposed one of the posters (the left one) over the right picture.

The light grey area appears to be where the manipulation was done.

 

[emzie]

SWEET. tenchar

 

[Gilder]

Besides, everything is supposed to be bigger in IMAX.

 

[emzie]

Everything seems photoshopped in the second.

Not that I'd mind... where's Cleric?

 

[Kal'thzar]

So? She probably okayed it, and if she didn't, she probably found iy a pleasent surprise.

I'm not so sure it was a pleasent suprise if it was one....

 

[Nylan]

I'm not so sure it was a pleasent suprise if it was one....

Yeah, more of an insult

 

[Babbler]

What's disturbing here is the fact people are talking about this.

 

[Bill3000]

selling the sexual of an underage girl(or boy) is crossing that line

No, not really. She's a post-pubescent adolescent - there is absolutely nothing wrong with being sexually attracted to her. And no, it is not pedophilia, either, because pedophilia is defined as sexual attraction to pre-pubesecent children. (No, having sex with a child doesn't make you a pedophile, either - you can have sex with someone without being sexually attracted to that person. It's a medical term.) Ephebophilia is not a paraphilia.

Besides, it's not like she's in a porn.

 

[DBear]

Those are two separate pictures, you can tell by how Emma look more stern in the second picture compared to the first. Clearly a case of making a mountain out of a molehill in more ways than one

 

[Phlegmak]

Those are two separate pictures, you can tell by how Emma look more stern in the second picture compared to the first.

More than one part of the image was touched?