Angst
Rambling and inconsistent
I have experienced quite heated debates about the role of a woman in the short duration of my life; seen the facts on paper regarding the poor and surpressed woman that still didn't get the same fair salary as men, read about the apparent objectification of the said women. My education seemed to have a premade conclusion on a lot of things, and it was clear that the woman, let alone having rightful control of her individual, was now still a property of the man. The woman is relying on male actions, the decisions of the male, and is the one who follows the decisions of the man; therefore the man is still ruling the world, and the woman is a poor and surpressed entity, having to fight for her social level.
Then I closed the books after class, and woke up in the real world.
You got to love the education in your primary school. Having your teachers amateur poets or idealistic writers because not enough people are studying for that work isn't really that terrible; while they might lack the paedagogical skill, they have some general knowledge about their majors that allow them to teach their students the said premade conclusions. Since that's what primary school is all about, helping students to learn how to conclude. But they are always decided upon by the teacher.
Having a low-quality freetime writer as a teacher is ok. But when it is one of the stereotypical feminist female novelists with a cigarette that pop up everywhere and write "exciting thrillers and crime stories", teaching the kids in school that girls are being stampeded by the boys in the class, then I pass those classes mentally. Seeing the general tendency, at least during the teenage years, that the socially powerful women choose and decide what boy is popular and what is not, able to simply wink at a boy to let them have their ways just hasn't convinced me that women are that below the status of the general man.
A woman might say that it is unfair that it is only boys that really have the ability to score, but it is always the woman herself who decides whether to dance with the guy or not. The modern woman has the right to say anything in general about guys, because we're all just one big mob of horny social idiots, but boys can't talk down about women without being defined as surpressing (And as a sidenote, I have nothing against women, I'm merely tired of them who can't get over the fifties), since that's what feminism really defines. Feminism states that equality between sexes has to exist; and I'm okay with that. However, Feminism requires to have the woman as the surpressed entity; otherwise it can't raise the woman to the same level as the man. As Feminism still exists today, since women know they are standing worse on the paper, that is that they aren't as well-standing as men in the working sector, they are therefore able to horrendously promote themselves socially without being hindered by the guys, since their social attributes are simply better. That's biology. Same goes for the natural leadership instinct in the general male brain that lurks from the eras of stone age hunting.
And no, women won't take control of the world or anything. I don't believe in battle of the sexes. I'm just sick of girls griping over pornography when men are equally treated as sexual objects. Stop whining, you don't get drafted. We're equal now.
Man I'm gonna get a lot of hate now.
Then I closed the books after class, and woke up in the real world.
You got to love the education in your primary school. Having your teachers amateur poets or idealistic writers because not enough people are studying for that work isn't really that terrible; while they might lack the paedagogical skill, they have some general knowledge about their majors that allow them to teach their students the said premade conclusions. Since that's what primary school is all about, helping students to learn how to conclude. But they are always decided upon by the teacher.
Having a low-quality freetime writer as a teacher is ok. But when it is one of the stereotypical feminist female novelists with a cigarette that pop up everywhere and write "exciting thrillers and crime stories", teaching the kids in school that girls are being stampeded by the boys in the class, then I pass those classes mentally. Seeing the general tendency, at least during the teenage years, that the socially powerful women choose and decide what boy is popular and what is not, able to simply wink at a boy to let them have their ways just hasn't convinced me that women are that below the status of the general man.
A woman might say that it is unfair that it is only boys that really have the ability to score, but it is always the woman herself who decides whether to dance with the guy or not. The modern woman has the right to say anything in general about guys, because we're all just one big mob of horny social idiots, but boys can't talk down about women without being defined as surpressing (And as a sidenote, I have nothing against women, I'm merely tired of them who can't get over the fifties), since that's what feminism really defines. Feminism states that equality between sexes has to exist; and I'm okay with that. However, Feminism requires to have the woman as the surpressed entity; otherwise it can't raise the woman to the same level as the man. As Feminism still exists today, since women know they are standing worse on the paper, that is that they aren't as well-standing as men in the working sector, they are therefore able to horrendously promote themselves socially without being hindered by the guys, since their social attributes are simply better. That's biology. Same goes for the natural leadership instinct in the general male brain that lurks from the eras of stone age hunting.
And no, women won't take control of the world or anything. I don't believe in battle of the sexes. I'm just sick of girls griping over pornography when men are equally treated as sexual objects. Stop whining, you don't get drafted. We're equal now.
Man I'm gonna get a lot of hate now.
giggle! 
The "oppression" which now exists is social, not legal. It is still there to fight, just in a different form.
