But I mean did it really subvert expectations? Jon Snow was always going to be the true righteous Gary Stu hero with the good heart who saves the world.. from the mad queen sure instead of the night King or Cersei but doesn't matter, the end result is the same. Sure he wasn't crowned king... Except he will clearly be in the real north. Absolutely no subversions of the typical royal blooded destined hero's journey trope story there. Same thing with Arya Mary Sue getting her happy ending and in general a Stark on the throne.. all the Starks get their big win even Sansa, which is not far from how I figured the whole thing would go, (I honestly thought Jon would kill Dany and go back to rule Winterfell while Sansa got the throne, yes unearned but to make up for all her toils)
Well, I'm not necessarily saying the "tie up" did. The final knot tying at the end of most works usually leaves folks either pleasantly happy or maybe a bit disturbed, but they don't often please everyone. What did you want for Arya anyway? Some mysterious death to close things out. A marriage to Lord Baratheon. An affair with Asha (Yara). Yeah, not much subverting there. However, she is the most popular character in the series. Ha..and as a sidenote..back when I used to frequent GRRM's blog years ago, he mentioned that his wife would divorce him (or maybe it was kill him) if he killed off Arya..ha. In my view, Arya kinda ended up doing what Arya would be expected to do ...go off on an adventure. No subverting - there, but not every storyline - or expectation that is - needs to be subverted.
Eh...Jon Snows ride off into the suns...er...snowscape..was a tad bland to me. I think the ultimate message there was that he was "free" and not captive to the Nightswatch, who also by inclination from that last scene very much accepted and encouraged that path. The subversion here was the expectation that Jon would rule everyone and do so wisely. The true happy ending.. That did not come to pass..and well..Jon did not want that anyway.
Bran on the molten metal throne - never expected that even with the stupid leakers. Honestly, I don't expect the book series - if it ever gets written - will end that way.
But Dany? That, to me, was a major subversion of expectations. I see it now kind of...and was very much not happy about it. I'd been Camp Dany for years. I thought she was the savior. But the more I think about ....not just the clues in the show, but in the book as well...I see the logic and genius of where GRRM or D&D took her. I really think it was a major point in GRRM's outline of the series..at least that was likely one true thing that D&D played out in their series. And remember Aerys was not always mad. There was an evolution there..the seed was there..but it took time to truly manifest itself. Dany was clearly becoming a megolomaniac, but we were not always seeing that because our "perception" and "expectation" was different.
Still, the show could have taken more time to show this progression. I think there was a lot of meat to work with here. Yeah, we'd probably would have had some slower episodes here and there, but honestly I like those episodes. I thought Episode 2 was the best of the season.
Don't get me wrong, there is a lot about this season, and well, the last two seasons that I'm not happy with. Primarily that it was rushed and that we had to wait two years for the THIS final season. Major gaps in writing and character development. I was cursing D&D all week for what they did to Dany. But I"m starting to see the light. I just wished I had more to work with to turn that light on.
- Why didn't Grey Worm and the Unsullied kill Jon after he murdered their queen? At least a fight between Jon and Grey Worm with Jon winning would have made a bit more sense?
- Why send Jon to the Wall to become part of the Night's Watch (Is there even a Night's Watch at this point?) when they could have just waited for the Unsullied and Dothraki to leave Westeros and then release Jon to be whatever he wants? I actually thought Jon was going to refuse the crown and take the Black, just like Maester Aemon did at one point...
- Why didn't the other Kingdoms request their own independence after Sansa did for the North?? Weren't they all independent at a time before the Targaryens arrived in Westeros? How does it make sense that a Northerner sits on the throne and the people of the North wouldn't want to remain under his command?
- Was Jon leaving to become a Wilding with Tormund??
I can't answer all of your question or won't as it is up to interpretation, speculation, or just plain opinion.. I do think Jon's story could have played out a bit better with more time for sure.
I will say though that technically the North is huge. It just as big as all the other kingdoms combined..granted a bit sparser and less rich for sure. But the Northerners have always been culturally more independent that the rest of the kingdoms who, with the exception of the Ironborn, are far closer in customs. The other kingdoms also varied over time in allegiances and vassalage and whatnot, but otherwise aligned in some way by virtue of or by marriage.
As for the ruler of the six kingdoms, the point there is that the ruler is elected. Doesn't matter if its is a Stark or whomever. It's the person that matters not where they come from. Bran being king has no bearing on the North's independence..and its a temporary thing anyway. That is, Bran Stark is on the throne now as he is the right man for the job, but the Stark lineage does not hold the throne.
As for the NightsWatch, it has exited for a 1000 years, mainly to fend off the wildings. No reason for it not to exist really, although one could presume that its importance has decreased significantly in some respects. Tyrion kind of addressed that too in a quote late in the episode - something to the effect that a place will always be needed for thieves, etc. to go.
I take it that Jon is going to his freedom - Wildling or not. In a way they will probably follow him. Wildlings seem to be evolving in a way as well. Honestly though, I don't like that he ended up there. I see the justification for it in one respect, but wished something better. I always liked Jon and rooted for him but overall he was mainly a static character. He was pretty much always honorable, loyal, and good - really the best person in this world. This may be why he connected with so many viewers. He was the typical type of character that people root for, but he was not really the winner here....but in reality, he was the actual Savior.