Verbose
Deity
The values of the free and open society are real. You want to replace them with something that does respect them at all because the imperfection of the world that's your business. But it is cutting off your nose to spite your face.
You want to replace them with something that does respect them at all because the imperfection of the world that's your business.
Life expectancy increased from under 40 to over 70; literacy increased from less than 25% to over 95%; child mortality decreased from over 300 per 100k to less than 20 per 100k; population in poverty decreased from over 80% to less than 5%; the total elimination of eleven major diseases including smallpox and malaria.The political legitimacy of the People's Republic of China is nil, non-existant.
You want to rationalize totalitarianism – fine by me.Life expectancy increased from under 40 to over 70; literacy increased from less than 25% to over 95%; child mortality decreased from over 300 per 100k to less than 20 per 100k; population in poverty decreased from over 80% to less than 5%; the total elimination of eleven major diseases including smallpox and malaria.
For your average Chinese person, these are achievements which convey at least some legitimacy.
You misunderstand me: I am not attempt to justify why the government of the People's Republic of China should considered legitimate, I am describing why it is considered legitimate by the majority of its citizens. It has achieved tangible improvements in the material conditions of ordinary Chinese people, that the material conditions of most Chinese people continue to improve, and seem likely to improve in future; that things today are better than they were yesterday, and will be better tomorrow than they are today.You want to rationalize totalitarianism – fine by me.
Life expectancy increased from under 40 to over 70; literacy increased from less than 25% to over 95%; child mortality decreased from over 300 per 100k to less than 20 per 100k; population in poverty decreased from over 80% to less than 5%; the total elimination of eleven major diseases including smallpox and malaria.
For your average Chinese person, these are achievements which convey at least some legitimacy.
that's ugh, the numbers is dubious, should we just take those numbers as granted and project it as reality of China? I don't think poverty is decrease to less than 5%, how they define poverty? what is the parameter? China is pretty famous for manipulating information and giving false projection about their image. Perhaps there is the factor of "don't want to lose face" that such concept hard to be understand by Westerners.
Poverty- Going from $1/day to $2/day would be 'lifted out of poverty' in some countries, not so in others.
Fool us once shame on them, fool us twice shame on us!
Yes, and that's how some of us remember the US trying similar tactics in Kuwait and Iraq to get its poodles
to follow them into war.
The Uyghurs are just the USA's latest pawns, just like the Kurds were when they were temporarily useful.
Remember the hand-wringing over the plight of the Kurds? But then...
The U.S. Is Now Betraying the Kurds for the Eighth Time
Nothing in this world is certain except death, taxes, and America betraying the Kurds.
https://theintercept.com/2019/10/07/kurds-syria-turkey-trump-betrayal/
It's not looking good for your side in the upcoming UN resolutions. Especially now that representatives
of the African Union have actually visited the region themselves.
Strangely, Ukraine has also recently changed its intention to vote against China.
Even stranger, Turkey (which IIRC has taken in the most Uyghur refugees) and most, if not all Muslim
nations are not backing the resolutions. Of course, the numbers might change before the actual resolution,
but your side's arguments don't seem to have convinced them. Maybe they read Adrian Zenz's report and decided it's
a crock .
US State Department accusation of China ‘genocide’ relied on data abuse and baseless claims by far-right ideologue
https://thegrayzone.com/2021/02/18/...de-relied-on-fraudulent-far-right-researcher/
Keep beating that Pompeo-Zenz wardrum!
Zenz is the primary source for the accusations against Uyghurs. Look him up. He'll have you in raptures.
Too bad you don't care about what other nations think of the accusations. They will be voting on it in the UN.
I'd like to hear all sides of the accusations and where they came from tested. You seem only to want one side.
As I said, I don't pretend to care about Uyghurs or Kurds and, although I'm a Communist, the Chinese system is
something that the CCP tailor to suit China at its present state of development. It is of little use in most other
countries.
I'm far more interested in watching the propaganda war and how information and disinformation spread. And it's
fun to throw in an article here that doesn't accept at face value what your side says.
The Uyghurs are just the latest Karens demanding that the World's Police come to help them. Maybe the CCP
should have used the same methods as the US in Afghanistan after a terrorist attack on their soil.
I predict the reply will involve either some kind of oppression Olympics or yet another tu quoque about the Western powers.
I don't see it spread by Russian media - in fact CFC is the first place where I'm reading it.
Russian media is rather indifferent to Hong Kong protests, aside of usual irony about the West trying to bring "democracy and freedom" to yet another place and that the locals should now beware not to end up like Iraqis or Libyans.
Whether US is paying them or not is irrelevant, more interesting is that their presence in Hong Kong was confirmed and that Neo-Nazis seem to have no doubt which side they should support.
What did your unfortunate refugees say their loved ones were charged with? Petty crimes (given that Uyghurs andFirst of all I know in person about the oppression due to the fact many of my close friends are Uyghur, I know many of them have lost contact with their family because they sent their family to the camp. I don't get the information from this Pompous Zenz as you try to discredit initially, in-fact I know first hand those who suffer from the oppression.
I see it more that you've been duped by those honest guys Trump, Pompeo and his colleague Adrian Zenz.Again no one want to tailor CCP or whatnot, you just derailing the conversation, understandably because you believe that by admitting the atrocities in Xin Jiang it is vis a vis endangering the formation and the existence of CCP. You are basically turn out to be their tool voluntarily.
And the rest of the low shot about Uyghur being Karen is just a low-taste of humor.
What did your unfortunate refugees say their loved ones were charged with? Petty crimes (given that Uyghurs and
some other minorities in China go to re-education camps instead of prison), or were they part of the East
Turkistan seccession movement and/or had they hooked up with al_Qaeda?
I see it more that you've been duped by those honest guys Trump, Pompeo and his colleague Adrian Zenz.
Trump is said to have lied at least 30,000 times during his time in office and you believe him?
You won't even read the counter-claims to their lies. And that's what will come up at any human rights
tribunal at the UN or The Hague, so you should look into them, because it won't be just the Chinese and
their stooges who will be presenting evidence against the claims. There are those who demand evidence, not
the type of crap that Trump's supporters tried to present to the courts in their >60 losing court cases.
That's exactly what claims from Trump and his rapture ready former appointees deserve!
BTW, the African Union representatives also disagree with you, and they went to Xin Jiang, saw the camps and the
so-called "slave labour" entities that employed Uyghurs.
Now you try to connect this human right crisis in Xin Jiang to right wing agenda and Trump again, and you said I believe all Trump 30.000 times lies without being critical, and I wonder where do you get this idea and how you can made up this thing out of nowhere. Smh. And again you mention how the world leader disagreeing with me, and all of those rant and diversion that has little to do with this discussion, I actually quite lost on what the heck you are trying to say here to be honest. So whatever, take and hug that claim, I hope you feel better.
Many lawyers
who presented those accusations without supporting evidence are now facing disciplinary hearings.