Akka
Moody old mage.
Of course I do. I just wanted the explicit admission that there actually is a treshold after which there is "too many" migrants. You have been on these boards enough to know that such a point is actually contentious.I want to believe that you get the difference between population disparity making it possible for one country to be flooded by immigrants, when another would had been able to incorporate them.
As I said above, I support fulfilling obligations. And don't worry, France and Greece have roughly the same numbers of immigrants and foreign-born population per-capita. And yes, I also support a EU-shared financial burden to pay and man the border patrols rather than letting Italy and Greece do most of the job. That's, again, being about respecting the democratic process.Simply put, if you don't see why Greece and France can't be taking the same number, it's not even worth being termed a bad faith discussion.
There is obviously stark differences between different socio-economical clusters, but I admit I don't really see how you can see a lot open to interpretation when you get massive (80 % answering "no" to "should France welcome more migrants ?", or 70 % considers that there are "too many foreigners") overall results.Your opinions do have something to do with how one may expect you to interpret the data about immigration opinions. You have come up with numbers, which is pretty good, but is still plenty open to interpretation. This for example indicates that the divisions may be particularly deep in France and so polling inaccuracy may be particularly prevalent.
I don't really get what sort of inaccuracies we're talking about here.