Greatest Comic Strip of All Time

Best?

  • Calvin and Hobbes

    Votes: 37 50.0%
  • The Far Side

    Votes: 8 10.8%
  • Garfield

    Votes: 3 4.1%
  • Peanuts

    Votes: 5 6.8%
  • Dilbert

    Votes: 4 5.4%
  • Foxtrot

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Dennis the Menace

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Krazy Kat

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Pogo

    Votes: 2 2.7%
  • Blondie

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Beetle Bailey

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Doonesbury

    Votes: 2 2.7%
  • Little Nemo

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Pearls before Swine

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • For Better or for Worse

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 9 12.2%

  • Total voters
    74
image003.jpg
 
ninja'd by Dachs though which should have been a ninja by me except I didn't mention it in my first post. Great, great strip though, certainly in my top three.
 
Gahan Wilson.JPG

Before the Far Side, there was Gahan Wilson.
 
Calvin and Hobbes is the best of the comics in the last 40 years. Watterson said his three inspirations were Pogo, Peanuts and Krazy Kat. Never read Krazy Kat, so can't comment on that.

I vote Pogo. I'm willing to bet a number of voters have never read it. Walt Kelly also deserves credit for lampooning McCarthy when that was a dangerous thing to do (Pogo was often a political strip, that more than once got him in trouble with editors).

Older strips do have an advantage in that the strips weren't being squeezed into smaller and smaller spaces. Watterson complained about this.
 
Calvin and Hobbes
Indisputably

*votes*

*looks at results*

9OobE.jpg
 
Why are action strips so underrepresented?

Good question. I have a couple of guesses.

One is that people prefer simple humor in a comic strip. They have an automatic tendency to look for humor in comics. Also, the more recent humor strips, starting with Peanuts, have more blank space which attracts the people and can be scanned quicker.

Most of the posters here are younger. Action strips take a greater beating every time the newspapers cut the space for individual strips. Humor strips are hurt, but not as much as action strips that normally demand more detailed artwork. Like Pogo, a lot of people may not have seen the older action strips.

Competition from other media. Humor depends often upon simple points and dialogue that either a strip or show or movie can present. Calvin and Hobbes wouldn't fit well into a movie format. Almost any action strip could be shown in a movie format to probably greater effect.

Action strips also demand greater involvement. Story lines may take months, demanding that the reader keep reading daily (or weekly). Comedy strips can often be picked up after a layoff of a week or two. Even the consistent stories (rarely over a couple of weeks) have a humorous point every strip.

Regretfully, the great age of the action strips in particular and comic strips in general is probably in the past. More competition from other media and the shrinking of space in newspapers. Similar to cartoons - we'll never see the like of Disney in the 30's or Warners and MGM in the late 40's and 50's again. I'm a little older so I do feel nostalgic for these art forms.
 
Alternatively, it's because action strips are generally crappy.
 
Tintin was OK.

Garth, not so much.
 
Peanuts is the best! Calvin and Hobbes is second to me.
The Far Side is pretty good too.
 
Where is C&H? :(
 
@Abaddon: In first place?

You have to buy the Daily Express in the UK to read it though, which means you are an idiot. Sometimes pubs have the Daily Express on the bar though.
 
@Abaddon: In first place?

You have to buy the Daily Express in the UK to read it though, which means you are an idiot. Sometimes pubs have the Daily Express on the bar though.

NO, he is referring to Cyanide and Happiness.

@Eran, that is one crazy comic.
 
xkcd wins hands down of course.
Of those listed I'de have to go with Calvin and Hobbes.

Your also missing Non-Sequitar which is really good.
 
As much as I loved Calvin and Hobbes growing up, I like them even more as an adult -- because now I get all the little jokes.
 
Back
Top Bottom