attackfighter
Emperor
Because it isn't 1200 anymore and I don't care if I have 30 kids?
Are you saying it's not basic instinct to reproduce?
Because it isn't 1200 anymore and I don't care if I have 30 kids?
But then again, the ultimate responsibility lies with the person A. It's his/her choice. C may be in love with A, or just desire A sexually, it doesn't matter that much - A is the one who says either yes or no to the offer. I understand that B may be angry, but there is no commitment on the part of C to care about B's emotional well-being.
Not when you become old enough to realize the repercussions of having 30 kids.Are you saying it's not basic instinct to reproduce?
I guess I'm old fashioned, but I try to avoid messing up a stranger's emotional well being without a reeeaally good reason. "I want some tail" usually doesn't fall into that camp for me.
In this situation, A is somebody who doesn't take relationship commitments very seriously...but is still unwilling to leave B. Unless there are some physical abuse variables there, 9 times out of 10, that sounds like a bad situation to me.
Yes, and given the opportunity, I'll do it again.
If she's not married, doesn't have kids and her boyfriend isn't a friend of mine she's fair game.
The guy would also be well within his rights to punch me in the face, but hat's a different matter.
No, these things happen.
I'd say the one who cheats on his partner is usually to blame, but it also depends on who initiates it.
It means C doesn't love B and just wants sex, which is perfectly acceptable.
Yes... it's the stuff wisdom is made of, those black and white views disintegrating.I find it interesting how black&white views on morality tend to disintegrate when you or people you care a lot about are involved. Which is partially a reason why I made the thread title a bit personal.
However C may be exploiting a temporary weakness in the relation between A and B.if the existing relationship between A and B is strong, nothing should ever happen and A should clearly rebuff C's advances.
Yes, this is the main point: there will be no cheating if everything is going well in the relation between A and B.If A is willing to cheat on B, why should C be held responsible for the crappy nature of their relationship?
In those cases where C is considered "guilty" it is mostly due to be the 'disruptive agent'.Even though C is essentially innocent, he/she will still be viewed in a negative light by other people? Why is that? Is it because he/she is seen as a 'disruptive agent' of some sort?
Depends on what we mean with "barely aware"what if the cheated person is someone you don't know - perhaps C was only barely aware of B's existence when he/she started pursuing A.
[*]do you consider it morally reprehensible to desire someone who is not single *and* act on these feelings?
[*]who do you think is primarily to blame, if there *is* anyone to blame? The one who is cheating, or the other person who is a willing participant in such an affair?
[*]what if this person (C) is fine with his/her "partner"(A) being unwilling to terminate his/her existing relationship (with B)? What does it say about those who are involved?*
[*]do you consider it morally reprehensible to desire someone who is not single *and* act on these feelings?
[*]do you consider it morally reprehensible to desire someone who is not single *and* act on these feelings?
[*]who do you think is primarily to blame, if there *is* anyone to blame? The one who is cheating, or the other person who is a willing participant in such an affair?
[*]what if this person (C) is fine with his/her "partner"(A) being unwilling to terminate his/her existing relationship (with B)? What does it say about those who are involved?*