History Questions Not Worth Their Own Thread VII

How did the Confederate States of America attempt to justify the suppression of counties, such as those in eastern Tennessee, that attempted to secede from the CSA?
The Confederate leadership didn't argue for a general right to secession, just for the right of states to secede from larger confederations. Sovereignty still resided in the state, or in the people as constituted in the state, and was consequently indivisible unless that state volunteered to divide itself. As these regions did not represent sovereign states, they did not have a right to unilateral secession.

The Union actually agreed with them on this; for example, the secessionist of West Virginia was not on paper unilateral, but authorised by a meeting of the state legislature which just so happened to consist entirely of representatives of the seceding counties.
 
Well (at least legally speaking), it isn't really the same thing. It was creating a new state as authorized by the (then recognized) government of the Commonwealth of Virginia. It's based on Article IV, Section 1 that specifically allows for the creation of new states from within existing states. It's the same thing that led to Tennessee and Kentucky being states. It's also analogous to creating the District of Columbia through Virginia and Maryland ceding territory.

It's different from secession in the sense that the Confederacy was using it, which was secession without consent.
 
My question is to everyone, but mostly to Czech users:

http://www.moraviamagna.cz/aktuality/a_test_DNA.htm

http://www.radio.cz/en/section/news/dna-tests-to-determine-dynastic-history-of-the-premyslids

04-07-2007 20:04 | Daniela Lazarová

DNA tests on the remains of 19 bodies thought to belong to the noble family of Premyslids will be used to determine who is who. The Premyslids founded the Bohemian Kingdom and ruled the country for 400 years. The first historical record of the Premyslids dates back to 872. The DNA project involves a 15-strong multi-disciplinary team of scientists and archeologists and is expected to take three to four years to complete. Nothing similar has ever been attempted in the world to date.

http://dna.com.cz/files/file/MiniFilerSS.pdf

But this story is to be continued as we started to work on a very ambitious project named Archeosteon where the main goal is DNA identification of Premyslid dynasty skeletal remains on Prague Castle. We will deal with samples of incalculable historical value, as Premyslids are credited as the founders of Czech statehood and the dynasty ruled over Bohemia from the ninth century until 1306.

http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/CZECH/2007-05/1178250216

April 25th, 2007

Jan Prerovský/THE PRAGUE POST
Forensics expert Daniel Vanek believes that Premyslid dynasty remains will fill in a picture long blank. A research project at Prague Castle is mapping the DNA of centuries-old Bohemian rulers with the aim of bringing Czech history “closer to the people,” the project’s lead researcher says.

In various locations around the castle — such as St. Vitus Cathedral, the Basilica of St. George and the destroyed Church of Our Lady — are buried the ancient remains of the Czech Premyslid dynasty, some of them more than a millennium old.

(...)

Credited as the founders of Czech statehood, the Premyslid dynasty ruled over Bohemia, and at times parts of modern-day Poland, from the ninth century until 1306.
According to legend, the dynasty is descended from the mythical princess Libuše, who foretold the founding of Prague during a vision. Libuše married Premysl, and their future descendants were named the Premyslids.

“The people buried at Prague Castle are very important for Czech history [but] we know only a little about them,” says Dr. Milena Bravermanová, an archaeologist at the castle who helped excavate the burial sites. “We have graves, we have skeletons, but we don’t know who these people were.”

“For us, it’s very important to know as much as possible about … our past. We hope the DNA research will help us do that,” she says.

Bravermanová has spent years painstakingly excavating the castle’s graves. Using brushes and special tools to carefully sweep away centuries of dirt, she and her team unearthed the bones, sometimes discovering things such as knives, jewelry or fragments of clothing along with the remains.

>From there, Vanek and his researchers took samples of the bones and laboriously extracted DNA samples. First, a piece of the bone is carefully cut using power tools, he says. The bone is soaked to remove the many “inhibitor enzymes” that impede DNA extraction. The bones are ground to a fine powder, and DNA is then amplified using a technique called polymerase chain reaction, or PCR.

It’s the same process Vanek used on bones from mass graves around Kosovo, where he aided in the prosecution of war crimes. It’s also the technique he uses to help Czech police crack unsolved homicides. U.S. authorities, too, use the process to identify remains of soldiers killed in Korea and Vietnam.

With bones younger than 10 years, DNA can be extracted in under a week, he says. With ancient material such as that found at Prague Castle, “it takes months, if you’re lucky.” His team has come out lucky. Using the DNA Vanek has extracted from the Prague Castle bones, Archeosteon researchers hope to firm up their understanding of the Premyslid history and family tree. It may even be possible to eventually imagine these nobles’ appearances, including hair and eye color, Vanek says.

“The science is running quickly. We have new techniques nearly every month,” he says. “But we don’t want to push it. The main goal is identification [and] to answer historical questions. And when we release our methods, we can help other archaeo-geneticists all over the world.”

(...)

Another question that could be answered by the project is whether the Premyslids really died out. Though the royal line is said to have ended in 1306 with the murder of King Wenceslas III, historians have reason to believe Premyslid descendants are still walking the Czech lands today. “We know that, from the 11th century, the dynasty spread very much,” Bravermanová says. “Because of this, it’s possible that some descendants are still alive. But we have a lot of years for which we know nothing. It’s possible that the DNA can help us.”

By testing “as many Czech males as possible” and creating a database of their Y-chromosome material, Vanek says, researchers may eventually be able to trace today’s Czech population all the way back to Premyslids, and further.

“The information stored on the male Y chromosome is transferred down through the generations. You can even trace our roots down to Africa, to Adam,” he says.

“It’s the mission of every scientist to find the answers to questions, and there are still a lot of unknowns about the Premyslid dynasty.”

What is the current stage of research in this project ???
 
How did the Confederate States of America attempt to justify the suppression of counties, such as those in eastern Tennessee, that attempted to secede from the CSA?


The US Constitution says nothing on the subject of secession. The Confederate Constitution explicitly forbids it.
 
The eldest son will often enjoy a courtesy title, for instance the eldest son of the Duke of Bedford is known as the Marquess of Tavistock and his eldest son is known as Lord Howland. (In case you're wondering, their family name is Russell.) Said courtesy title is usually a subsidiary title also possessed by the father.

The younger sons and daughters of dukes and marquesses are traditionally given the title 'Lord', and sons of barons are 'the Honourable'.
What about Nieces and Nephews?
 
Except in very unusual cases, it's who your father was, not who his brother was. If your father was 'Lord So-and-So' because your uncle was a duke, then I think you'd be 'The Honourable' and it would stop there.
 
Did every ancient culture except the Hebrews create rules so they can do whatever they pleased without any morality and practice child sacrifice?
 
No, Chukchi. What's more, I'm sure you already knew the answer to that.
 
Well, now you do, and that would seem a good place to start from. Oddly enough, the people who lived in the past were still people.
 
Start with reading up on ma'at if you want an ancient value system.

If you follow that up by not gullibly repeating every idiotic thing someone says to you, you'll do much better.
 
All I know about Ma'at is what was said in Immortal Cities: Children of the Nile where it said Ma'at is the Egyptian Goddess of Justice, but that's probably wrong. Anything that I try to find out for myself always ends up being wrong.

The way they keep telling me their facts, they once told me that I should never believe anything that I've read or seen and should be skeptical on everything and what they're telling me is correct.
 
Which is the way it's going to continue, quite clearly.
 
If supposedly Britain joined World War 2 over Poland, then why did Britain later entirely give up on defending Polish interests?

For more info about those interests, read posts #3, #2 and #4 in this thread - especially excerpts highlighted with blue colour:

http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=536835

Especially post #3.

By the end of WW2 and after WW1 all Allied & Entente powers had more pro-Polish attitude than Britain - including both the USA and France. Britain after WW1 had a pro-German and pro-White Russian stance and in the last phase of and after WW2 it had a pro-Soviet stance, ignoring the imminent Cold War.
 
Did every ancient culture except the Hebrews create rules so they can do whatever they pleased without any morality and practice child sacrifice?

I'm probably going to regret this (and it may be the way it's phrased), but I don't understand this question.
 
I'm probably going to regret this (and it may be the way it's phrased), but I don't understand this question.

Chukchi Husky has people telling him outrageously stupid things from an extremist christian position quite often and needs help separating fact from fantasy.
 
Chukchi Husky has people telling him outrageously stupid things from an extremist christian position quite often and needs help separating fact from fantasy.
Or they are just morons. I remember him posting about how they said Skyrim was 'too linear'.
 
I'm probably going to regret this (and it may be the way it's phrased), but I don't understand this question.

I was told that every old culture, like the Egyptians, made their own idols so the people could do whatever they pleased without any morals, and it always ended up so they could do bad things like child sacrifice. They also said that every pagan god is either about sex or war, because that's what every person if they aren't given morals.

I've never read the Bible. All that I know about history is what I got from some basic, simple books, some documentaries and some podcasts, but I'm told those were wrong.

Chukchi Husky has people telling him outrageously stupid things from an extremist christian position quite often and needs help separating fact from fantasy.

I don't know about extremist. They do take the Bible literally, saying it's the only accurate and factual account of history, and there are no contradictions.

Or they are just morons. I remember him posting about how they said Skyrim was 'too linear'.

No, what they said is that games shouldn't try to be open-ended as it is pointless, and games are better when they are linear. One of them send a letter to the Official Nintendo Magazine about it.
 
I was told that every old culture, like the Egyptians, made their own idols so the people could do whatever they pleased without any morals, and it always ended up so they could do bad things like child sacrifice. They also said that every pagan god is either about sex or war, because that's what every person if they aren't given morals.

Whoever tells you that doesn't know what they're talking about. Obviously it's not true.

I've never read the Bible. All that I know about history is what I got from some basic, simple books, some documentaries and some podcasts, but I'm told those were wrong.

If the people telling you these are wrong are the same people telling you the other stuff, then they're probably wrong about that too.

I don't know about extremist. They do take the Bible literally, saying it's the only accurate and factual account of history, and there are no contradictions.

Then they are extremists, because they're taking an irrational view rather than an evidence-based one, and they're wrong. They may be worth talking to about other matters but don't pay attention to any historical claims made by people like that, because they're not being objective. (Admittedly no-one's entirely objective, but people like that aren't even trying.)

No, what they said is that games shouldn't try to be open-ended as it is pointless, and games are better when they are linear. One of them send a letter to the Official Nintendo Magazine about it.

That's wrong too, because games aren't books. There are great games with linear stories, but I think games' true potential lies in open-ended worlds. Minecraft doesn't have a storyline but it seems to be doing OK. This is why Dwarf Fortress is the future. But this may be a little off-topic.
 
Back
Top Bottom