Homeschooling should be banned

I guess the highschool as a tough experience probably isn't very applicable I come from a very pro military family and am planning a military career and will no doubt get all the experience I need from that. There definitely are kids that fit the stereotype of social recluse but a homeschooler 9 times out of 10 will get a better education then a kid in public school.

I really doubt this. I did 4-H as a kid. (No idea why, my parents were big into that sort of crap even though we weren't a rural family) I met a ton of homeschoolers there. A few bright ones, but most of them weren't. I'd rather see some conclusive studies (Preferably ones not funded by groups whose primary purpose is promoting home-schooling) on this instead of taking your word for it.
 
I don't see whats wrong with home school, as long as the kid can do well in the exams there is nothing wrong with it, if the parents want to indoctrinate, then they have plenty of time to do it anyway when they come home from school, and since most kids will follow their parents ideals rather than teachers the arguement that it leads to more indoctrination doesn't quite add up to me.
 
So does anyone in this thread know enough about homeschooling to actually make some legitimate points against it?

There are legitmate points against it, like lack os social interaction and lack of exposure to different points of view.

However I disagree entirely with the conclusions of the OP, specially when you consider that those two issues can be easily corrected, and how bad public schools can be. It would not surprise me at all if homeschooled kids performed better than public school kids in standardised tests. In fact I have read some stuff that suggest as much.
 
Rather, homeschooling should be properly licensed to teach the curriculum, making it essentially more difficult to weasel out of proper standards (along with standardized tests). Also, religion should never be accepted as a reason for allowing homeschooling; if the guardians wish to give supplemental religious education, it should be done outside of the time teaching school curriculum.

This is the correct way to approach homeschooling.

There is a key need of oversight in homeschooling that is not often brought up, and many special interests get in the way. Homeschooling is a necessary right for parents, the states should be able to test these kids to make sure they are actually getting an education. This testing should obviously cover all subjects, and if the students fail to answer key questions, especially related to science, then their parents should be considered unfit to educate them.

One thing non educated that has to be done to fringe groups. If people refuse to give their kids vaccinations or health care, they should not have the right to be parents. A few fringe groups can't be allowed to keep a whole society in danger of meningitis, mumps, etc.

My beliefs are rather harsh, but I still value homeschooling. I was set ahead extensively by being home schooled for a year, but that doesn't mean I support its hijacking by fundamentalists
 
I think the only purpose of homeschooling is to keep kids who get brutally bullied at school from committing suicide.
 
I have friends who were homeschooled, one of which is now at Yale and has a very vibrant social life. Don't judge it until you've tried it.
 
SeleucusNicator said:
Moreover, your critique of "mom and dad cannot be impartial teachers" is meaningless, as the same can be said for virtually any human being, including public school teachers.
It's not meaningless. There's a very clear bias in having a parent teach a child. Unless a public school teacher has sexual relations with a student, the level of distrust on grading is much, much higher when your mommy and daddy want you to get an A.

SeleucusNicator said:
I've actually heard that in Canada, there is a fair amount of indoctrination in public elementary schools. Your arguments of "freedom of thought" and "academic choice" are strange, because there is not much of that in elementary school. I don't know about Canada, but in the United States you are generally not allowed to pick your own classes and teachers until high school, and not really until college (which is where true academic freedom begins).
Good. Some indoctrination is necessary. You can't not indoctrinate over facts like 1 + 1 = 2, or evolution being true, what is safe sex, the holocaust happening, or "natural" food being inherently fallacious. Critical thinking happens in different areas.

But that's not the indoctrination that we're criticizing. We're criticizing the indoctrination of patently false and fringe ideas which will only hurt the child to believe that it is true later in life. We're criticizing the complete lack of exposure to different viewpoints that you can get from being around people outside of your family. It is vicious to force your child, consciously or subconsciously, to have the same belief system as yourself, whether it be religious, political, or otherwise.

Bigfoot3814 said:
puglover was homeschooled and he's going to college.
Yes. A community college. :lol: And he missed a year of school.

Aegis said:
Being home schooled does not mean a child will not be accepted into a University. In actuality, they have to take standardized tests by the State, to ensure that they are actually on-par with their public school peers. They do in fact obtain their HS diploma, take the SAT/ACT and can get into Universities rather easily.
This isn't done in every state, which is a huge part of my problem - the lacks of checks. And it does make it harder to reach into university because of the fact that someone who gets all As from his parents is inherently suspicious.

Besides, it doesn't matter. There are a lot of abusive parents who are willing to indoctrinate. High school dropouts should not homeschool. There needs to be checks on both. You can cry "BUT PARENTS KNOW BEST" all you want, but there are many, many horrible parents in the United States which is causing this country to turn into a craphole, and the least you can do is make sure they arn't crappy parents before they are schooled instead of trusting them beforehand - abusive parenting needs to be prevented, not merely punished. You cannot appeal to tradition when reality says otherwise. You need to make sure that the teachers are sane, for example, or are smart enough to comprehend the subject.

And all of it can be done by accredited private schools, too, without these massive problems.

luiz said:
It would not surprise me at all if homeschooled kids performed better than public school kids in standardised tests. In fact I have read some stuff that suggest as much.
The studies are crap. Homescooling is self selected. Schooling is mandatory. You're talking about a bunch of parents who care about their kids in one way or another as opposed to everyone else. It's not a statistically fallacious comparison.
 
Seeing as the OP does not back up any of the "points" in his rambling tirade with facts there's really nothing to respond to.

If you thought homeschooling was bad, check this out. :eek:
 
There's nothing wrong with community college; I'd recommend it for most people for their first two years, and then transfer to a university for the last two. Unless you're in a specialty program (pre-med, for instance) you're largely taking Gen. Ed. classes and lower-level courses for your major, most of which should transfer to a state university. It's cheaper, and the quality is relatively the same.
 
There's nothing wrong with community college; I'd recommend it for most people for their first two years, and then transfer to a university for the last two. Unless you're in a specialty program (pre-med, for instance) you're largely taking Gen. Ed. classes and lower-level courses for your major, most of which should transfer to a state university. It's cheaper, and the quality is relatively the same.
Indeed especially in these financial times they will be growing.
 
The studies are crap. Homescooling is self selected. Schooling is mandatory. You're talking about a bunch of parents who care about their kids in one way or another as opposed to everyone else. It's not a statistically fallacious comparison.

Well if you are admiting that parents who homeschool care more than the others, on average, and that the results will be better, on average, I don't see the problem. I understand your suggestion that if the kids who are homeschooled were sent to a public school they could do better, since they come from a generally better background.

But fact remains that if those parents are doing a better job than the average of the state and other parents, banning homeschooling seems unfair.

Just make homeschooled kids take one broad standardised test every year. Banning the whole thing is a typical authoritarian measure of folks in love with social engineering.
 
Nice luiz. Those arguing against homeschooling have no legs to stand on. Data pointing out that they're wrong is dismissed as "statistically fallacious". This is a pure garbage troll thread and should be closed.

Moderator Action: I believe there is merit in some discussion here.
 
From what I've always heard, home schooled children tend to do much better on standardized tests (which the parents are not allowed to administer) than those who went to public school. Colleges typically don't have any problem admitting home schooled children with high test scores.

It is quite common for home schooled children to go to public school for some or all courses once they reach the high school level, when the curriculum may start to exceed the parents' knowledge. The valedictorian of my sister's high school class (who also had the highest SAT and second highest PSAT, after my sister's, in the school, iirc) was home schooled until high school (and part of the day during the first 2 years of high school), as were all 11 or so of her siblings (most of which were adopted) who were also near the top of their class. I don't remember what college she ended up going to, but I believe it was in the Ivy League.
 
Back
Top Bottom