Well how much does WalMart take in v. those churches?Not very, apparently. Thought I can't say that I'm too surprised.
I suggest everyone read both this blog post from Pharyngula as well as the source for his article at SecularHumanism.org [link currently down]
A few interesting bits:
Heck, even I am more charitable than that! But then again, I'm not sending out missionaries across the globe. Do the missionaries get some sort of financial support during their stay? I've met several of them, and I must be honest that I'm glad they're giving people a pleasant first-hand impression of the US. But we don't need religion to do that.
This is a better way to incentive charitable giving, clearly. Consider it tithe on commercial activity!
[IMG=http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/files/2012/06/cragun-table-1.png]http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/files/2012/06/cragun-table-1.png[/IMG]
$71,000,000,000 per year. Every year.
Or, for a more digestible number:
$195,000,000 per day. Every day.
Oh, still to big to really understand?
$135,000 per minute.
Tick, tock!
As you can probably tell by now, I'd much rather see that money put to better use. Education, anyone?
Most of the Vatican's operational cost is financed with visitors. I'm not sure selling the common heritage of mankind so it disappears into the hands of a private collector in order to temporarily reduce a portion of problems is the greatest ideaA lot of churches in my area have community service projects and food drives for the poor, which doesn't come directly from money but from food donations and participation.
A big misconception is that every American church is has gold statues and rich ministers like it's the Vatican![]()
The Church also runs a number of hospitals in the US (10% IIRC).It is worth noting that many religious institutions underwrite schools and universities. Catholic parochial schools are an excellent example as they provide superior education for fair less than many other private schools.
When you discuss education as a better way to spend your charitable giving, consider just where that's going as well. When you donate to your alma matter's alumni fund is that money going to provide a scholarship or to put in a new stadium. (Of course a new stadium might bring in more money for scholarships. Just shows how complex the ethical calculus of charitable giving can be.)
So people should run expenses that provide absolute zero returns? Sounds financially sound.I think providing a means of indoctrinating future generations isn't charity by any stretch of the imagination. Now, if they actually ran totally free secular schools with no religious instruction whatsoever in poor neighborhoods which accepted everybody no matter their religious beliefs that would be an entirely different story.
Are diocese even allowed to destroy the records?I've never seen any Catholic charity that required baptism to receive charity. How would they even check for that? Fill out some paperwork and hope your old diocese hasn't chucked the records?
I think Anti-science Protestant church schools might convince you otherwiseMy experience most religious private schools would probably be in the top half of public high schools. I don't have experience with secular private high schools.
"Missionaries are suppose to lead by example. They should be helping the community. They should use this good work and examples as a way to bring people to understand the grace of God"
This doesn't mean they are trying to force people. (That mindset changed hundreds of years ago at least for Christians) They want people to join their religion because they believe it is for their good. Just like they help them with things they need for their own good. Most religions don't have nefarious intentions. They believe what they are doing is for the betterment. A lot of them are doing things for the betterment of people.
He thinks religion makes people stupidWinner I don't know what you think MOST churches and religions are but they certainly don't force people to convert anymore. Most of the missionaries honestly want to help people. Just like Habitat for Humanity people (or other secular charity). The fact that these people believe a certain religion and hope to share the message of that religion with these people while doing good work doesn't take anything away from them. Most won't turn someone away because of a religious difference. They just believe what they believe and want to share the good news of that belief with people.
Whether they are wrong is up for another debate but they do think they are doing another good work by sharing their beliefs.