amadeus
Bishop of Bio-Dome
There was a thread before about the coronavirus and economics. I’ll restate my position as I believe I had written it before:
I think because we have an easily-identifiable disaster as opposed to a typical economic recession where the cause is opaque. The unemployment subsidy is also playing a role of course in masking the damage, but then I think that gets into a numbers game more than a reasoning of why attitudes are the way they are.
Comparing it to the housing bubble, what are the conditions necessary to “get out” of it? Were banks lending too much? Were Fed. rates too low? Too high? It gets into questions that most people wouldn’t have an answer for, and questions that many economists couldn’t agree on.
I have no idea if that’s what’s really going on, but that’s my gut reaction.
I think because we have an easily-identifiable disaster as opposed to a typical economic recession where the cause is opaque. The unemployment subsidy is also playing a role of course in masking the damage, but then I think that gets into a numbers game more than a reasoning of why attitudes are the way they are.
Comparing it to the housing bubble, what are the conditions necessary to “get out” of it? Were banks lending too much? Were Fed. rates too low? Too high? It gets into questions that most people wouldn’t have an answer for, and questions that many economists couldn’t agree on.
I have no idea if that’s what’s really going on, but that’s my gut reaction.